by ashurbanipal » Fri 11 Nov 2005, 12:52:09
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') didn't understand that you are a seer. I am honored that you have emerged from your temple to address me.
If I get a a large caliber handgun, point it at the back of someone's head, and pull the trigger, do I have to be a seer to predict that the person will die? Of course not. Why not? Because I understand physics well enough to know that the bullet has sufficient velocity to cause, and the tissues of the human head not enough density, structural integrity, and mass to prevent, massive damage to the afforementioned head. I also understand enough about biology to know that if a brain is destroyed, the person who owned the brain is killed.
Of course, maybe the gun will misfire. Maybe the bullet will travel along precisely the right arc to strike the skull with exactly a 45 degree angle of incidence, in which case it might bounce off. Maybe a meteor will crash through the roof at precisely the right time and place to deflect the bullet as it is travelling through the air. But those are rare occurrences, and the likelihood of them happening is pretty small. I'm right to predict death.
So do we have to be seers to look at how the world works, how much food is produced, how dependent we are on oil, how many people there are and what the minimum each one needs would be, how politics functions, etc. and predict doom? Of course not. Now, maybe someone will discover a couple Ghawars somewhere. Maybe zero point energy will actually work out. Maybe a great and benign world leader will emerge with a plan and enough power to mitigate without doom. But none of those are likely scenarios.