Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

What level of porn should be illegal?

Current levels (underage)
27
No votes
Proposed levels (Beastiality)
5
No votes
Proposed levels (S&M, Cleveland Steamer)
1
No votes
All Hardcore
0
0%
All Porn, whatsoever
3
No votes
None, whatsoever (I dare you...)
10
No votes
 
Total votes : 46

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby holmes » Wed 21 Sep 2005, 15:59:10

Biker good Frontline link. That frontline show is good. I do not want that industry near me at all. My friend in Portland owned a porn shop. I met a hoard of the stars and not to shiny sex workers. Weird and wild to say the least. Its a bad scene. some of the Women and men who do it as a business doing straight stuff are alright. Its when your older or not a "hottie" and your only shot is in the gutter stuff. The things they do are all true. If your a young stud "in the business" around these women watch out. they will proposition u anywhere anytime.
But I think drugs have made it worse.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby PhilBiker » Wed 21 Sep 2005, 16:16:33

Emerson did you take the time to watch that documentary I linked to? Highly recommended. This issue is not nearly as simple as you pretentiously and self-righteously (and disingenuously IMO) portray.

Most (not all) of what we call porn is extremely degrading and dehumanizing to women.
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 21 Sep 2005, 16:29:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', 'E')merson did you take the time to watch that documentary I linked to? Highly recommended. This issue is not nearly as simple as you pretentiously and self-righteously (and disingenuously IMO) portray.

Most (not all) of what we call porn is extremely degrading and dehumanizing to women.


I did not watch it, I must admit. It's 53 minutes long and I'm at work. It's bad enough that I'm posting on billable time. :P

And I do agree that most porn is degrading to women, but the degradation and subjugation of women didn't start with the porn age, did it? The burka is as dehumanizing as a whip and handcuffs, IMO.

I'll try to watch tonight. I've seen Pink Flamingos, which would be illegal according to these new standards, so I'm ready for anything.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby lotrfan55345 » Wed 21 Sep 2005, 17:18:18

OMG...

Just keep in the way it is.

Because obviously we have solved every other problem more important than this.
lotrfan55345
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis / Pittsburgh

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 21 Sep 2005, 22:27:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', 'E')merson did you take the time to watch that documentary I linked to? Highly recommended. This issue is not nearly as simple as you pretentiously and self-righteously (and disingenuously IMO) portray.

Most (not all) of what we call porn is extremely degrading and dehumanizing to women.


I just watched parts 5 & 6; they seemed to be the focus of the documentary. While I agree that the violent scene is a bit much for my tastes, I can't concede that there is some arbitrary 'community' standard to which we should adhere. The 'community' standard seems set up to fail porn of any kind from 'passing the test', especially when you consider who might be 'giving the test'. I can't expect that 60 and 70 year olds would have the same standards as a 20-30 year old, so how can the test be relevant? Using this logic, you could outlaw rap music, as it offends most people in the community, but appeals greatly to its core audience.
We've got to have something more tangible to use as a 'community standard', if we are to have one at all. Perhaps acts showing depictions of what would be considered felonious crimes, consentual or not, could be the baseline. This would include depictions of rape, murder, molestation and physical abuse. Laws not subject to the whims of the court of public opinion, whatever that might be, are a good start.

Thanks for the links, though. It's a subject that deserves more review by the feds and all of us. :cry:
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 00:30:18

Yes it's a good series but they get to the real meat of the problem in the 2nd to last and last segments. Yikes!! How are rape scenes and snuff films (even if simulated, how can you tell?) and forced, nonconsensual abuse and beating of actresses "good clean innocent fun"?

To the people running that biz, sure it's fun because it's not their Tribe. Look at the noses! Look at the names! It's about time standard are brought in, the standards the mainstream porn industry itself have brought in, even.

Go, Gonzales!
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby ubercrap » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 00:34:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', '
')
Most (not all) of what we call porn is extremely degrading and dehumanizing to women.


Classic liberalism/leftistm-standing up for other people perceived as weak as a reflection of your own feelings of inadequacy. Also, how do you know that the attitude that women can't decide what's best for them isn't more degrading than what you are denouncing? I also detect a hint antiquated notion that women shouldn't enjoy sex.
User avatar
ubercrap
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 09:46:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'H')ow are rape scenes and snuff films (even if simulated, how can you tell?) and forced, nonconsensual abuse and beating of actresses "good clean innocent fun"?


I agree, it doesn't get my rocks off. If there's lawbreaking involved (rape, abuse), it must be punished. But, like I said, baseline standards must not be arbitrary. Like the argument of one of the defense lawyers, you can't expect New Orleans to have the same 'standards' as Cheyenne, Wyoming; just as you can't expect soccer moms to have the same 'standards' as the pierced X-gen.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'I')t's about time standard are brought in, the standards the mainstream porn industry itself have brought in, even.


Are we talking professional licensure for pornographers?
Would the exam be...nah, I can't do it. :twisted:
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby PhilBiker » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 09:52:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')sing this logic, you could outlaw rap music, as it offends most people in the community, but appeals greatly to its core audience.
That may be about the most absurd thing I've ever read from you mr. biggins. :) You wrote that seriously?$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')lassic liberalism/leftistm-standing up for other people perceived as weak as a reflection of your own feelings of inadequacy. Also, how do you know that the attitude that women can't decide what's best for them isn't more degrading than what you are denouncing? I also detect a hint antiquated notion that women shouldn't enjoy sex.
Just when I thought I'd read the most absurd post ever, you post this..... Ok... righto...$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')erhaps acts showing depictions of what would be considered felonious crimes, consentual or not, could be the baseline. This would include depictions of rape, murder, molestation and physical abuse.
You've just outlawed 90% of hollywood movies good and bad.
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby ubercrap » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 10:11:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')ust when I thought I'd read the most absurd post ever, you post this..... Ok... righto


Oh? Well, calling it absurd is absurd. :P
User avatar
ubercrap
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 10:16:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')sing this logic, you could outlaw rap music, as it offends most people in the community, but appeals greatly to its core audience.
That may be about the most absurd thing I've ever read from you mr. biggins. :) You wrote that seriously?$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')lassic liberalism/leftistm-standing up for other people perceived as weak as a reflection of your own feelings of inadequacy. Also, how do you know that the attitude that women can't decide what's best for them isn't more degrading than what you are denouncing? I also detect a hint antiquated notion that women shouldn't enjoy sex.
Just when I thought I'd read the most absurd post ever, you post this..... Ok... righto...$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')erhaps acts showing depictions of what would be considered felonious crimes, consentual or not, could be the baseline. This would include depictions of rape, murder, molestation and physical abuse.
You've just outlawed 90% of hollywood movies good and bad.


No, what's absurd is setting arbitrary standards for an industry based on taste.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')aste cannot be controlled by law. Thomas Jefferson

Oh, but we will try, won't we?
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby PhilBiker » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:42:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')o, what's absurd is setting arbitrary standards for an industry based on taste.
Which I completely agree with. So now your next project is to explain to me how this:$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')MHO, these types should be illegal:

1) Porn involving anything/anyone who can't give consent, for either legal and/or physical reasons.

Includes:
Kiddie porn (obviously), mentally handicapped (come on), beastiality (horses & snakes can't concur contractually)

2) Porn with any actor (besides Ron Jeremy - give 'em props) over the age of 50.

Includes:
Anything with Bea Arthur starring as 'head nurse'. Ewww.

Everything else should be legal. Period.

Includes:
'Softcore', 'Hardcore', College Co-eds, Orgies, 'Girls Gone Wild', S&M (not my cup of tea), Gay Porn (ditto), Tranny porn (do you have to ask?), et. al.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')erhaps acts showing depictions of what would be considered felonious crimes, consentual or not, could be the baseline. This would include depictions of rape, murder, molestation and physical abuse. Laws not subject to the whims of the court of public opinion, whatever that might be, are a good start.
Is not "arbitrary standards for an industry based on taste"

Oh, you mean "my arbitrary standards based on what I, The Enlightened One, have deemed is ok. Anything more conservative than what I think, is, of course, unenlightened and ridiculous"......

Hello, Pot? This is kettle calling..... Guess what. You're black!
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:46:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', 'O')h, you mean "my arbitrary standards based on what I, The Enlightened One, have deemed is ok. Anything more conservative than what I think, is, of course, unenlightened and ridiculous"......

Hello, Pot? This is kettle calling..... Guess what. You're black!


My baselines are merely trying to make 'sense' of what 'community standards' should be, if there are to be standards at all. And, of course, if we agree that the concept of 'community standards' is ridiculous, then we don't have a problem, do we?

:o
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 12:52:03

I retract my former baselines for the illegality of porn, if only for Philbiker's sake. If he can't stand someone else's opinion of 'how it should be', then he should not be made to hear it. I guess that makes two of us.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby PhilBiker » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 13:26:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'I') retract my former baselines for the illegality of porn, if only for Philbiker's sake. If he can't stand someone else's opinion of 'how it should be', then he should not be made to hear it. I guess that makes two of us.
You seem to have completely missed the point........... Which is...........

The delineation of what is and what is not allowable is not as clear cut and black and white as you seem to think. Opinions that differ with yours deserve the same respect you demand of your own opinions. This is the way democracy works. The best and only way to decide what is and what is not decent is by challenging "community standards" on a case by case basis in court.

Which is exactly what is happening here. Watch the whole documentary that I linked to, not just some parts of it. It's the best coverage of the issue that I've ever seen.

You seem to be advocating an authoritarian "this is allowed/this is not" system, with your definitions of what should be and what should not be allowed as the only possible allowable condition. This would have been nice in the former USSR or Nazi Germany or someplace, and I'm sure the religious right would like to be the arbiters of taste as well, but that's not the way it works here in the USA.

I agree with your statement that $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'w')hat's absurd is setting arbitrary standards for an industry based on taste.
This is not what is happening with this FBI Squad at all. There's nothing arbitrary going on here.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd, of course, if we agree that the concept of 'community standards' is ridiculous, then we don't have a problem, do we?
We certainly don't agree at all on that. I personally don't need or want hardcore porn in massive billboards on the highway. That's a community standard. If someone were to post something like an explicit "vivid" ad on a billboard next to a day care center there's no law specifically against that, they'd have to be brought to court for "violating community standards". I personally think that's a better system than having a law on the books that defines exactly where and when certain things are appropriate. Stuff like the MPAA ratings system are not codified in law, they're voluntary. I like that better than what you seem to be proposing.
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 14:14:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', '
')The delineation of what is and what is not allowable is not as clear cut and black and white as you seem to think. Opinions that differ with yours deserve the same respect you demand of your own opinions. This is the way democracy works. The best and only way to decide what is and what is not decent is by challenging "community standards" on a case by case basis in court.

Which is exactly what is happening here. Watch the whole documentary that I linked to, not just some parts of it. It's the best coverage of the issue that I've ever seen.

You seem to be advocating an authoritarian "this is allowed/this is not" system, with your definitions of what should be and what should not be allowed as the only possible allowable condition. This would have been nice in the former USSR or Nazi Germany or someplace, and I'm sure the religious right would like to be the arbiters of taste as well, but that's not the way it works here in the USA.


To go back to the documentary for a moment:
Twelve men & women sitting on a jury at 10:00 a.m. in a formal courtroom are going to decide what constitutes a violation of community standards? I don't feel comfortable saying that a fetish porn video is 'A-OK' in a courtroom full of my community brethren, but I might be inclined toward watching that same video one night, given the right circumstances.
See any problems here?

And please don't be so naive as to think that the 'arbiters of taste' aren't being heavily influenced by the neocon/religious right agenda. If they can make headway into classification of types of porn as being 'illegal', they will not stop until *all* porn is illegal. Why weren't we focusing on this during the Clinton years?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', 'T')his is not what is happening with this FBI Squad at all. There's nothing arbitrary going on here.


LMAO! :o No, of course not. Eight FBI suits sitting in D.C. certainly seem to represent all the diversity of opinion in America...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', 'W')e certainly don't agree at all on that. I personally don't need or want hardcore porn in massive billboards on the highway. That's a community standard. If someone were to post something like a "vivid" ad on a billboard next to a day care center there's no law against that, they'd have to be brought to court for violating community standards.


If there aren't laws against it, then obviously billboard companies have felt the pressure against putting it up in the first place. That's called the free market at work. I agree, it's completely voluntary, let it be.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', 'I') personally think that's a better system than having a law on the books that defines exactly where and when certain things are appropriate. Stuff like the MPAA ratings system are not codified in law, they're voluntary. I like that better than what you seem to be proposing.


Stuff like a crack-FBI squad prosecuting purveyors of porn isn't voluntary at all. The fact that there aren't codified laws against this or that only increases the ambiguity with which prosecutions can be handed out.

Four fingers - good. Five fingers - bad? :roll:
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby PhilBiker » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 14:50:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'I') don't feel comfortable saying that a fetish porn video is 'A-OK' in a courtroom full of my community brethren, but I might be inclined toward watching that same video one night, given the right circumstances.
See any problems here?
I see that you're telling me you're a hypocrite. :) No problems other than I don't want you on any juries now.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'A')nd please don't be so naive as to think that the 'arbiters of taste' aren't being heavily influenced by the neocon/religious right agenda. If they can make headway into classification of types of porn as being 'illegal', they will not stop until *all* porn is illegal.
Again, your same mantra "my opinions are right and people who don't agree with me are wrong". Thanks for the self-righteous condescension. The "arbiters of taste" in the current system are the members of the juries who see the cases. The FBI team only works with the attorney general to decide what to bring to court.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'W')hy weren't we focusing on this during the Clinton years?
That's a question for Janet Reno.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'L')MAO! :o No, of course not. Eight FBI suits sitting in D.C. certainly seem to represent all the diversity of opinion in America...
According to.... what exactly? I have absolutely no idea where you're going here or what you're even complaining about.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'I')f there aren't laws against it, then obviously billboard companies have felt the pressure against putting it up in the first place. That's called the free market at work. I agree, it's completely voluntary, let it be.The laws are against "violating community standards". If the porn company put up an explicit billboard next to a day care center as in my ridiculous example, they'd get fined and forced to take down the board for breaking the law against violating the community standards assuming someone like the FBI Porn Squad convinced a DA to bring a case to court. These kinds of laws are specifically vague for many reasons, most importantly that community standards change. The community standards are decided by a jury. It sounds to me like you would like a totalitarian law that removes juries and places arbitrary contraints on content that are decided by you.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'S')tuff like a crack-FBI squad prosecuting purveyors of porn isn't voluntary at all. The fact that there aren't codified laws against this or that only increases the ambiguity with which prosecutions can be handed out.So again what do you want here? A massively complex codified law for what is allowed and what is not, based on your personal opinions? That's what it appears that you are advocating. What about people who don't agree with your opinions?
Last edited by PhilBiker on Thu 22 Sep 2005, 14:57:10, edited 1 time in total.
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 14:56:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', 'A') massively complex code for what is allowed and what is not, based on your personal opinions? That's what it appears that you are advocating. What about people who don't agree with your opinions?


Funny thing. Sounds like what you're advocating too. Violate one's opinion 'for the benefit of all'.

I don't want the 'community' deciding what my opinions should be, thanks.

Peculiar thing - the only time I advocate the workings of the free market as superior, I get labeled as a totalitarian Nazi - in textbook Godwin fashion, to boot.

:o
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby PhilBiker » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 14:58:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PhilBiker', 'A') massively complex code for what is allowed and what is not, based on your personal opinions? That's what it appears that you are advocating. What about people who don't agree with your opinions?


Funny thing. Sounds like what you're advocating too. Violate one's opinion 'for the benefit of all'.

I don't want the 'community' deciding what my opinions should be, thanks.

Peculiar thing - the only time I advocate the workings of the free market as superior, I get labeled as a totalitarian Nazi - in textbook Godwin fashion, to boot.

:o
I think you're deliberately just ignoring the entire issue at this point.....

Sounds like now you're advocating that the most deplorable stuff on film should be allowed no problem..... the "community" is who has decided that kiddie porn is wrong. Guess we're not allowed to draw the line anywhere now...
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: FBI Creates 'Porn Squad'

Unread postby PhilBiker » Thu 22 Sep 2005, 15:05:48

I'm advocating that we don't codify anything beyond what's already on the books. I say let the courts and juries decide what the standards should be instead of the lawmakers. The best way to test the community standards is to bring the really deplorable stuff to court and see if it flies. Apparently I give juries much more respect than you do. It's up to public attourneys to decide what to bring to court, if anything, for violating community standards. Whether they lose or win will set precedents which the adult industry can use as a guideline. As it is now they have nothing but "anything goes" to decide on since there hasn't been any cases in so long.

I personally see no problem with this FBI Effort, it's fine by me, and I don't feel that my personal freedom is threatened by it at all, and my personal opinions on porn are irrelevant to my opinion on this specific matter.
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron