by jaws » Mon 12 Sep 2005, 23:20:38
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Concerned', '
')
NO you just showed how you think it's ok to rip people off. Somehow this is your verson of capatilism?
I'd suggest as a starting point
http://www.mises.org/Subjectivity of value is the foundation of Mises' theory of economics. I know this for having read it, and it was quite enlightening. I recommend you do the same.
Mises would tell you there is no such thing as ripping people off unless you break your contractual obligations. The native American tribe who sold Manhattan valued it very little. They valued beads much more. From their subjective point of view the trade was a clear win.
I'll give you another, more hypothetical example. In the 1530's Francisco Pizarro invaded the Inca empire, a civilization that was literally bathing in gold. They had so much gold that nearly everything was made out of it. It was in fact their only metal. Unfortunately the Spanish had in their hands a much better metal, steel. Steel rapiers and armor were used to slaughter the Inca army defending the emperor, and the Spanish took no casualties in the battle. Now what do you think a set of one hundred steel rapiers would have been worth in gold to that emperor? It would have been worth easily all the gold he had on hand, because those one hundred steel rapiers would have defeated the spanish conquistadores and saved his empire from destruction.
Here is the part where you accuse me of supporting exploitation and ripping off the native Incas. That is completely baseless. You only see exploitation because you apply
your subjective valuation of the two goods from your point in time to the value of gold and steel rapiers. Obviously today steel rapiers are worthless, while gold is much more valuable. They should never agree to such a trade you say, as that would be exploitation. If they do agree, then some insidious forces must be forcing them into the trade. Capitalism, based on subjective value of tradeable goods, becomes exploitation.
That was no help to them. They needed those rapiers and they needed them then, not now, and they needed them in Peru, not in some arsenal in Europe. Gold in Peru was practically worthless, while in Europe is was extremely valuable. Value is established in a definite time and a definite place. At different times and different places values are completely different. That was another important lesson of Mises, which incidentally was used to debunk the concept of GDP accounting.