by Optimist » Fri 09 Sep 2005, 15:54:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')DP is nothing more then a way to convert our existing energy, mostly in the form of electricity to run the plant, into oil (and at a loss too, as its only 85% efficient overall). The waste is another required ingredient, yes, but its not where the energy input for TDP is.
You know nothing about power generation, do you? A coal power plant converts between 15 and 20% of the energy in the coal to electricity. Compared to that 85% capture is staggering.
Note that the only electricity needed to operate the plant is about 3.6% of the energy produced by TDP, and that is only counting the oil. I believe that is an ERoEI of 99.5/3.6 = 27.6. Way bigger than 1.0 you will be glad to know. See Figure 6, p8 at
http://www.itcnet.org/Fire%20web%20site ... rocess.pdfPete may call the above a "company press release" but educated observers will notice it is actually a scientific paper, presented at the Power-Gen Renewable Energy Conference, Las Vegas, NV, March 1-3, 2004. Granted, the presenters have ties to CWT and thus have an incentive to make TDP sound good. However, there is no way around that. This is one of a small number of technical documents on TDP available on the web.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')nce you think about it, the real answer is to reduce both our waste production AND our energy use.!
BINGO! And since oil demand would be lower under such a scenario, TDP would be able to supply an even larger fraction of the total demand.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')ebating with optomist is a unqiue experience. It gets shriller and then he disappears for a while soon to return with more company press releases. You have to wonder how and where he sourced them.