Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE DuPont Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

THE DuPont Thread (merged)

Unread postby nth » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 04:44:23

Dupont has reduce energy use and uses less than in 1990 and yet company is growing and producing a lot.
This is an energy intensive company. If they can reduce to 1990 levels and below, that means US can go back to 1990 levels oil usage?

Efficiency does have a chance to keep our lifestyle for a couple of decades it seems.
Dupont status report

The more I think about this- the more amazed I am. It is possible to conserve electricity, so that we don't use more electricity to support our lifestyle.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Dupont uses less energy and yet produce more goods

Unread postby EnergySpin » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 11:39:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', 'T')he more I think about this- the more amazed I am.
It is possible to conserve electricity, so that we don't use more electricity to support our lifestyle.

nth I'm amazed you are amazed. Your posts seem to be relevant, so why does this simple fact of life amazes you?
Have you noticed how much electricity junk you might have in your apartment/house?
If it is sunny outside and you have a laptop with a WiFi ... get in your front yard and start posting. Lights go out in the house .... and you get a tan as well. If you cannot get outside ... why don't you turn the lights off and open a window?
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Dupont uses less energy and yet produce more goods

Unread postby nth » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 11:44:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', 'T')he more I think about this- the more amazed I am.
It is possible to conserve electricity, so that we don't use more electricity to support our lifestyle.

nth I'm amazed you are amazed. Your posts seem to be relevant, so why does this simple fact of life amazes you?
Have you noticed how much electricity junk you might have in your apartment/house?
If it is sunny outside and you have a laptop with a WiFi ... get in your front yard and start posting. Lights go out in the house .... and you get a tan as well. If you cannot get outside ... why don't you turn the lights off and open a window?

I am amazed because the conservation you are talking about requires us to change our lifestyle.
Dupont produced more chemicals and synthetic goods than ever before, yet they held their energy use and reduced it while producing more goods.
This is like saying I can have twice the amount of lights and still use less energy than before.
Which is possible if I switch to energy efficient light bulbs. I guess that is what Dupont did.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Dupont uses less energy and yet produce more goods

Unread postby EnergySpin » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 11:58:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', 'I') am amazed because the conservation you are talking about requires us to change our lifestyle. Dupont produced more chemicals and synthetic goods than ever before, yet they held their energy use and reduced it while producing more goods. This is like saying I can have twice the amount of lights and still use less energy than before. Which is possible if I switch to energy efficient light bulbs. I guess that is what Dupont did.

I think you are mixing the issues or you had too much corporate/mass advertizing propaganda that interfered with your brain (sorry, I had to say that). Walking out of your house leaving the lights on does not really advance your quality of life, does it? I do not see how switching off the lights is a drastic change in one's lifestyle. In the hospital I work most of the lights/computers are kept on, even in areas that are not used. After 5pm when the outpatient clinic space is a desert ... computers keep running, AC is left on and lights provide ample of light to what? Ghosts?
This is wasteful consumption , hurting the economy and the environment. At least 35-40% of consumption by similar environments (corporate HQs is a prime example) could be saved just by switching to simple measures like that. Western Europe (which I have visted and worked) have adopted light conservation measures in hotels, government buildings etc. Lights and appliances are turned off after hours ... no need to keep them one.
At home switching off the appliances rather than the power-standby mode can easily save 15% off consumption.
Chemical industries can save on electricity by incinerating products instead of releasing them to the atmosphere. The ammonia industry can recuperate a sizebale percentage of the energy that went into synthesis by combusting (rather than dumping to the air) the byproducts after 4-5 round of synthesis. Same thing with plastics . And yes buy those bulbs ... and do a google search on phantom load
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Dupont uses less energy and yet produce more goods

Unread postby nth » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 13:12:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', 'I') think you are mixing the issues or you had too much corporate/mass advertizing propaganda that interfered with your brain (sorry, I had to say that). Walking out of your house leaving the lights on does not really advance your quality of life, does it?

You are the one who is mixing things up.
You told me to leave the building and work outside. That does change my lifestyle. My company does not allow me to work outside. It will require change of policy.
That is how you tell me to save electricity.
This has nothing to do with corporate or mass advertisement.
I have yet to see ads of any company to tell you to leave your lights on or leave anything on when you are not using it.

And also, regarding my amazement, I have seen many posts where people claim our society requires increasing energy consumption in order to keep our consumerism society growing. I notice Dupont was able to do it without increasing energy usage.
I don't think consumerism can continue and I will be very happy to see the end of it.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n the hospital I work most of the lights/computers are kept on, even in areas that are not used. After 5pm when the outpatient clinic space is a desert ... computers keep running, AC is left on and lights provide ample of light to what? Ghosts?
This is wasteful consumption , hurting the economy and the environment. At least 35-40% of consumption by similar environments (corporate HQs is a prime example) could be saved just by switching to simple measures like that.

I totally agree with you about conserving.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')hemical industries can save on electricity by incinerating products instead of releasing them to the atmosphere. The ammonia industry can recuperate a sizebale percentage of the energy that went into synthesis by combusting (rather than dumping to the air) the byproducts after 4-5 round of synthesis. Same thing with plastics . And yes buy those bulbs ...

Actually, I already do. I was trying to compare stating Dupont just use more efficient equipments and such.

So Dupont is being a nice company by incorporating these environmentally sound practices, why aren't other companies doing the same?
I see several chemical companies that have not cut back to 1990 levels of green house gas or energy consumption. I guess we need laws to force them. It costs significant amounts of money to upgrade facilities- other companies don't think they can afford it.
Anyways, my point of posting is to show to others that it is possible for the world to reduce energy consumption, yet increase productivity.
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Dupont uses less energy and yet produce more goods

Unread postby EnergySpin » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 13:21:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') have yet to see ads of any company to tell you to leave your lights on or leave anything on when you are not using it.

Cultural inertia ... actually you might be wrong on that. A lot of people "claim" that computers should not be turned off. If a company does not dismiss this rumour among its employes, it is as if they are pushing for waste.
Regarding Dupont: the idea is to produce more with less; if their changed was not accompanied by a fixed output, they are "hurting" the environment more now compared to 1990.
Question: Would you perceive a policy (i.e. the Federal Govt had done something similar) of removing the light bulbs of 1/3 lights, using natural lighting instead of electricity as a sharp decline in the quality of life?
I'm just curious ...I sometimes get that response when people ask me why I switch all the lights off from work and shut every computer down before leaving the clinic
"Nuclear power has long been to the Left what embryonic-stem-cell research is to the Right--irredeemably wrong and a signifier of moral weakness."Esquire Magazine,12/05
The genetic code is commaless and so are my posts.
User avatar
EnergySpin
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sat 25 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Dupont uses less energy and yet produce more goods

Unread postby nth » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 14:04:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergySpin', 'C')ultural inertia

Ah... yes.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.').. actually you might be wrong on that. A lot of people "claim" that computers should not be turned off. If a company does not dismiss this rumour among its employes, it is as if they are pushing for waste.

Again, inertia here. Not to be confused with advocacy.
Actually, the whole idea of not turning things off goes way back when equipments were costly and will likely to fail when booting. Electricity surge will happen and may damage machines. I am not sure if this is ever applicable in my lifetime, but that was what I was told the reason behind it and now, people still thinks this apply, but it really shouldn't.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')egarding Dupont: the idea is to produce more with less; if their changed was not accompanied by a fixed output, they are "hurting" the environment more now compared to 1990.

Well, by producing more goods, you extract more stuff, so not good for environment. Is that your reasoning here?
The only solution is to end consumerism.
Everyone I talked to don't like consumerism as an idea, but they sure enjoy it. :(
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Q')uestion: Would you perceive a policy (i.e. the Federal Govt had done something similar) of removing the light bulbs of 1/3 lights, using natural lighting instead of electricity as a sharp decline in the quality of life?

No, I don't.
Smart design can save us a lot of energy! You are right about that.
I also don't mind not turning up the heat. And I hate the AC being blasted during summer. I think AC blasting is actually a decrease in quality of life. But those are my opinion.
I think businesses think they are a hassle and costs more in initial costs to change buildings to more environmentally friendly. Even though, they will save long term. Also, someone did a study that says environmentally friendly buildings boost moral. Natural light gives good vibes. :)
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m just curious ...I sometimes get that response when people ask me why I switch all the lights off from work and shut every computer down before leaving the clinic
Unless all your computers are part of the cancer research!
Then you might be saving lives by wasting energy. :P
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Dupont uses less energy and yet produce more goods

Unread postby thegrq » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 17:37:09

Here's another way to reduce energy use and maintain our lifestyle: Get everybody to drive a Volkswaggen Golf!

The average fuel efficiency of cars today is 20mpg, the Golf gets around 40mpg (diesel golf that is). If everybody increased their fuel efficiency by 2 times (ie, everybody starts driving a VW Golf) then US oil consumption is reduced by 18%. The calculations and original article are here.

Driving a Golf would not change our way of life. Even driving a hybrid, which apparently can get up to 80mpg now, wouldn't change our way of life.
User avatar
thegrq
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Kingston, ON, Canada

Re: Dupont uses less energy and yet produce more goods

Unread postby nth » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 18:27:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thegrq', 'H')ere's another way to reduce energy use and maintain our lifestyle: Get everybody to drive a Volkswaggen Golf!
The average fuel efficiency of cars today is 20mpg, the Golf gets around 40mpg (diesel golf that is). If everybody increased their fuel efficiency by 2 times (ie, everybody starts driving a VW Golf) then US oil consumption is reduced by 18%. The calculations and original article are here.
Driving a Golf would not change our way of life. Even driving a hybrid, which apparently can get up to 80mpg now, wouldn't change our way of life.

If you drive a truck or SUV and switch to Golf, then it is a change of lifestyles. You won't be able to carry so much stuff and people.
Also, which hybrid gets 80mpg?
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

THE DuPont Thread (merged)

Unread postby LadyRuby » Tue 28 Feb 2006, 10:55:12

DuPont to Displace Fossil Fuels

Hurray for DuPont (I think).
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, unlike most chemical companies, has moved the quest for bio-based raw materials off the wish list and onto the to-do agenda. The company has allocated nearly 10 percent of its $1.3 billion research budget to extracting ingredients from carbohydrates — things that grow and can be infinitely replaced — rather than from hydrocarbons, which are mined or drilled and readily depleted.

DuPont already makes 10 percent of its products from nonpetrochemical substances, and Charles O. Holliday Jr., DuPont's chief executive, expects to increase that to 25 percent by 2010. By then, he says, such products will yield the equivalent of $3 billion in revenue in current dollars. The way Mr. Holliday sees it, so-called industrial biotechnology can solve myriad problems. It can insulate DuPont from the relentless rise in gas and oil prices. It can win kudos from environmentalists and shareholders who worry about the harmful effect of extracting and burning oil. It can play well in Washington, particularly since a quest for alternate energy sources was a crucial point in President Bush's State of the Union message. But during a nearly two-hour conversation in his spacious office above the Hotel DuPont, Mr. Holliday stressed his real motive in pushing for bio-based materials: his belief that they yield better products. He notes, for example, that the corn-based propane diol, a product used in carpet fibers that DuPont will begin selling this spring, offers better dye absorption and stain resistance than the petrochemical version DuPont now sells.

"We're using biology to solve problems that chemistry can't," he said.
It is not just bombast. DuPont is working with the Energy Department to turn corn plants — the husks, the ears, the stems, everything — into vehicular fuel. DuPont is close to developing plant-based hair dyes and nail polishes that will not adhere to skin, surgical bio-glues that can stanch internal bleeding and a textile fiber made from sugar that will act and feel like cotton.

This spring DuPont will open a factory in Loudon, Tenn., that will make propane diol — trademarked as Sorona — from glucose. For now the output is earmarked for carpet fiber, but DuPont is exploring whether it can work in rigid plastics for automobile interiors or de-icing compounds for airplanes.
The company has already converted many labs that once worked on pharmaceuticals or textiles — two businesses DuPont has shed — to now search for ingredients to replace oil and gas. Next year, it plans to cluster them all in one building and move a marketing staff in with them. ...
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US
Top

Re: DuPont Looking to Displace Fossil Fuels as Building Bloc

Unread postby Zardoz » Tue 28 Feb 2006, 11:01:19

*ponders buying DuPont stock*
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Re: DuPont Looking to Displace Fossil Fuels as Building Bloc

Unread postby FoxV » Tue 28 Feb 2006, 11:25:30

lets not forget that DuPont is doing this not because they want to, but because the have to.
So the real question is will these new renewable and enviromentally friendly products be cost effective competion to fossil fuel based products from Europe and Asia.
If they're not, then we may be witnessing DuPont's dying gasps in North America (until the Mid East starts running out of Nat Gas, then DuPont will be back in like flynn)
Angry yet?
FoxV
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed 02 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: DuPont Looking to Displace Fossil Fuels as Building Bloc

Unread postby OilBurner » Tue 28 Feb 2006, 13:52:44

"DuPont already makes 10 percent of its products from nonpetrochemical substance"

So DuPont is currently reliant on petrochemicals for 90% of its products? Good luck to them, but they've got a long way to go.
Burning the midnight oil, whilst I still can.
User avatar
OilBurner
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 388
Joined: Thu 03 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: UK

Re: DuPont Looking to Displace Fossil Fuels as Building Bloc

Unread postby strider3700 » Tue 28 Feb 2006, 16:00:55

Everytime Oil goes up Dupont's stock goes down. It's great that they are trying to change but I'm not convinced this makes them a good investment.

If they succeed then you'll probably get a little growth. If they fail they'll probably tank. Not much rewart there.
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island

Re: DuPont Looking to Displace Fossil Fuels as Building Bloc

Unread postby grabby » Wed 01 Mar 2006, 04:15:45

If on fifth of the oil is used for manufacturing, (from 80 million barrels a day) that means 20 million barrels a day of oil are needed to cure our chemical manufacturing fix.
42 gallons times 20 million = 820 million gallons of chemical based organics per day.
One bushel of corn produces about 1.7 gallons of high grade carbon liquid.
converting that to long chain incurs losses and yields about 1 gallon of crude equivalent.

so you need 820 million bushels of corn a DAY to replace the oil when oil runs out.
How many bushels of corn did the whole USA grow in the whole YEAR last year>?
13 days worth about. Wether dupont is 100 percent succesful with 100% fermentation and 1000% conversion we dont have enough farmers to do the change over for the worlds chemical plants.

it wont help us. if we did use all our corn and wheat and ate grass instead, we could only supply 1/20th of our needs with the corn and wheat we produce.
so we will run out of oil instead ot 9 years, then it would be 9 years and 3 months instead, plus we dont get any corn flakes or doritoes for the next 9 years.

alternates wont help a noticeable bit. even if they were 100 percent succesful.
Dupont is obviously interested in reaping some of that alternate energy free tax money, instead of being serious about helping cure our oil fix. what theiy are doing deosn't stand a snowball in summers chance of preventing the oil crash.
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

BP and Dupont Receive Top Scores

Unread postby Graeme » Wed 22 Mar 2006, 04:15:18

BP and Dupont Receive Top Scores in First-Ever Ranking of 100 Global Companies on Climate Change Strategies
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')fter years of inaction, a growing number of leading U.S. companies are confronting the business challenges from global warming, recognizing that greenhouse gas limits are inevitable and that they cannot risk falling behind their international competitors in developing climate-friendly technologies. Some U.S. companies, such as General Electric, are catching up and joining DuPont and Alcoa in leading their industries. But many others are still largely ignoring the climate issue with "business as usual" strategies that may be putting their companies and shareholders at risk.

These are among the key findings of a first-ever report issued today by the Ceres investor coalition that analyzes how 100 leading companies are addressing the growing financial risks and opportunities from climate change - - whether from expanding greenhouse gas regulations, direct physical impacts or surging demand for climate-friendly technologies. Altogether, 76 U.S. companies and 24 non-U.S. companies in 10 business sectors are profiled in the report.

Among the industry sector leaders and laggards:
Sector Leaders Laggards
Oil/Gas BP (90 points*) ExxonMobil (35)
Chemical DuPont (85**) PPG (21)
Metals/Mining Alcan (77) & Alcoa (74) Newmont (24)
Electric Power AEP & Cinergy (both 73) Sempra Energy (24)
Auto Toyota (65) Nissan (33)

theautochannel
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: BP and Dupont Receive Top Scores

Unread postby Doly » Wed 22 Mar 2006, 11:41:11

One of the reasons I chose to buy BP shares, of all possible oil companies. They look like they know exactly what's at stake, and are ready for the alternatives.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

DuPont to Produce New Bio-Polymers for Automotive Markets

Unread postby Graeme » Wed 28 Jun 2006, 00:10:07

DuPont to Produce New High-Performance Bio-Polymers for Automotive, Other Markets
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')uPont expects to begin production in 2007 of new high-performance thermoplastic resins and elastomer products made from two of its latest bio-based materials. The products will be targeted for automotive, electrical/electronic and other industrial markets.

DuPont will make intermediates for Sorona polymer and Hytrel from corn sugar instead of petroleum, using a patented and proprietary process. The key ingredient in Sorona is Bio-PDO, which replaces petrochemical-based 1,3-propanediol (PDO). The new DuPont Hytrel offering is produced using a new DuPont polyol also made with Bio-PDO.

In addition to replacing petrochemicals with renewable resources, the manufacturing of Bio-PDO requires approximately 40% less energy to produce than its petrochemical-based counterpart. That represents saving the equivalent of about 10 million gallons of gasoline per year, based on annual production volumes of 100 million pounds of Bio-PDO. The new products will contribute to DuPont’s corporate goal of deriving 25% of revenue from non-depletable resources by 2010.
greencarcongress
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: DuPont to Produce New Bio-Polymers for Automotive Market

Unread postby SchroedingersCat » Wed 28 Jun 2006, 18:10:12

Why use "non-depletable" instead of "renewable?" Odd choice for a press release, me thinks.
Civilization is a personal choice.
SchroedingersCat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu 26 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The ragged edge

Re: DuPont to Produce New Bio-Polymers for Automotive Market

Unread postby jsb1969 » Thu 29 Jun 2006, 09:19:37

...just a friendly particular here, in language. It's 'methinks' not 'me thinks'. I guess I just love that word and am pleased when I see it.
Cheers.
User avatar
jsb1969
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005, 03:00:00


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron