Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Blacklisting 'subversive speech' Friedman's true colors

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Blacklisting 'subversive speech' Friedman's true colors

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 03 Aug 2005, 13:37:27

Thomas Friedman, the voice of reason, who sees both sides of an issue and can be reliably counted on to arrive at some kind of middle ground "solution" ---exposed for the scumbag he truly is.

This guy is toxic waste poured into a three piece suit.

"New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman has urged the US government to create blacklists of condemned political speech - not only by those who advocate violence, but also by those who believe that US government actions may encourage violent reprisals.

The latter group, which Friedman called "just one notch less despicable than the terrorists," includes a majority of Americans, according to recent polls."

http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/0728-03.htm
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Blacklisting 'subversive speech' Friedman's true colors

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 03 Aug 2005, 13:48:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'T')homas Friedman, the voice of reason, who sees both sides of an issue and can be reliably counted on to arrive at some kind of middle ground "solution" ---exposed for the scumbag he truly is.

This guy is toxic waste poured into a three piece suit.

"New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman has urged the US government to create blacklists of condemned political speech - not only by those who advocate violence, but also by those who believe that US government actions may encourage violent reprisals.

The latter group, which Friedman called "just one notch less despicable than the terrorists," includes a majority of Americans, according to recent polls."

http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/0728-03.htm


Hopefully, the party of inclusi...., err, collusion will take it and run with it.
Remember, 54M terrorist sympathizers voted for John Kerry! :roll: :lol:
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 03 Aug 2005, 13:52:07

Is Friedman proposing another House Un-American Activities Committee?
Or, perhaps it can be in the Dept of Homeland Security. Oh Goody!

#%@!* chicken-hawk brownshirts. McCarthy would be proud... 8O
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Unread postby hotsacks » Wed 03 Aug 2005, 16:01:30

Funny,I don't see Friedman in a three piece suit. I see him in Ports linen slacks and custom made shirts,just slightly left of preppie. He eats at 21 but prefers The River Cafe. He reads the classics,particularly Shakespeare and Sun Tzu, and donates regularly to the David Suzuki Foundation. Vacations in France,to refresh his reasoning powers. All things are good for T.Friedman so long as they are American or American derivatives. His next column will argue the historical precedents and the present imperative for a blacklist. After all,a lifetime figuring out what makes a 'civilized' man gives one the right to dictate these things.
It's weird now,what with the radical-in-a-Porsche age passing and narcissism merging with senility. Friedman will be extremely influential in the public arena in coming days. He's stuck his finger in the wind and smelled fascist gunpowder.I'm sure it's an odour that reminds him of home.
User avatar
hotsacks
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Wed 03 Aug 2005, 16:08:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'I')s Friedman proposing another House Un-American Activities Committee?
Or, perhaps it can be in the Dept of Homeland Security. Oh Goody!

#%@!* chicken-hawk brownshirts. McCarthy would be proud... 8O


WAR IS PEACE

FREEDOM IS SLAVERY

IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

LONG LIVE THE REPUBLIC!!!

God I hope I'm wrong about this... :cry:
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Unread postby Specop_007 » Wed 03 Aug 2005, 16:46:26

I'm not entirely against this, but as usual the .gov would take it WAY to far.
Last edited by Specop_007 on Wed 03 Aug 2005, 17:18:18, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 03 Aug 2005, 16:53:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'I')'m not entirely against this, but as usualy the .gov would take it WAY to far.


Would you be more comfortable with the private sector contracting it out from the government? Mercenaries, perhaps?
Last edited by emersonbiggins on Wed 03 Aug 2005, 17:01:28, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Wed 03 Aug 2005, 16:54:32

Time for a "necktie party" for Friedman! He's so afraid his neocon ideals won't get carried through (and thousands of working-class Americans won't get to die for his plans) that he's willing to bring in Stalinist measures.

Well, when people get desperate and hysterical because they might lose power over the life and death of others, that's when what they fear most is most likely to happen - they go down in flames.

Let's hope the US gets an attack of common sense soon, and Friedman is tried and convicted for his words and actions which have resulted in the deaths of thousands of Americans and possibly millions in the 3rd world, and yes of course they bring back hanging, we've discussed the effeciency of that elsewhere on here. A good rational American court to try him, pass the verdict, and remove said "industrial waste in a 3-piece suit" from our environment.

Dance 'n' dangle, Friedman!
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Unread postby Specop_007 » Wed 03 Aug 2005, 17:19:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'I')'m not entirely against this, but as usualy the .gov would take it WAY to far.


Would you be more comfortable with the private sector contracting it out from the government? Mercenaries, perhaps?


Yeah, thats exactly what I'm tryin to say....... :roll:
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 03 Aug 2005, 17:21:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'I')'m not entirely against this, but as usualy the .gov would take it WAY to far.


Would you be more comfortable with the private sector contracting it out from the government? Mercenaries, perhaps?


Yeah, thats exactly what I'm tryin to say....... :roll:


Please enlighten us. Who would you consider blacklisting? ACLU? Sierra Club? Chairman of the National Democratic Party? Give us some scope.
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Unread postby erl » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 01:03:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '
')Please enlighten us. Who would you consider blacklisting? ACLU? Sierra Club? Chairman of the National Democratic Party? Give us some scope.


A good start. :P




[Edited by erl]

I was just gonna leave it at that. But, you might not take it in the spirit it was offered. I understand the limits of the internet. That's why we use emoticons.

So, here is the long version. I think you're overreacting. This guy wrote an article. That's it. No congressional hearings, no bills introduced, nothing more than one guy spouting off.

Four turtles marching out of the pet store do not constitute a 'stampede.'
erl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby hotsacks » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 01:41:42

Yep,just a guy spouting off in a newsheet no one reads,certainly not any lawmakers who make up their own minds about these things and pay no attention at all to columnists and their ilk.
God's in his heaven,all's right with the world.
User avatar
hotsacks
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 02:22:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('erl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '
')Please enlighten us. Who would you consider blacklisting? ACLU? Sierra Club? Chairman of the National Democratic Party? Give us some scope.


A good start. :P




[Edited by erl]

I was just gonna leave it at that. But, you might not take it in the spirit it was offered. I understand the limits of the internet. That's why we use emoticons.

So, here is the long version. I think you're overreacting. This guy wrote an article. That's it. No congressional hearings, no bills introduced, nothing more than one guy spouting off.

Four turtles marching out of the pet store do not constitute a 'stampede.'


Very true. :)
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: Blacklisting 'subversive speech' Friedman's true colors

Unread postby k_semler » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 02:29:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'T')homas Friedman, the voice of reason, who sees both sides of an issue and can be reliably counted on to arrive at some kind of middle ground "solution" ---exposed for the scumbag he truly is.

This guy is toxic waste poured into a three piece suit.

"New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman has urged the US government to create blacklists of condemned political speech - not only by those who advocate violence, but also by those who believe that US government actions may encourage violent reprisals.

The latter group, which Friedman called "just one notch less despicable than the terrorists," includes a majority of Americans, according to recent polls."

http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/0728-03.htm


8O I thought it was only the millennial generation that thought that the press and speech should be regulated by the government, (discounting communists)?

I say he is advocating me to be violent against himself. We should lock him up for his own protection before he gets strung up. He is advocating a criminal act, don't you know.

THIS IS THE ENEMY WITHIN!! :evil: :evil:
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
Top

Unread postby Specop_007 » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 08:40:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'I')'m not entirely against this, but as usualy the .gov would take it WAY to far.


Would you be more comfortable with the private sector contracting it out from the government? Mercenaries, perhaps?


Yeah, thats exactly what I'm tryin to say....... :roll:


Please enlighten us. Who would you consider blacklisting? ACLU? Sierra Club? Chairman of the National Democratic Party? Give us some scope.


Pretty much only a few things.
1) Nambla
2) Radical Islamic devils
3) No flag burning
4) Muslims
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby Doly » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 08:49:38

Only Muslims? Why not chicanos as well, now that we're at it? :razz:
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby VinceG » Thu 04 Aug 2005, 08:51:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('erl', 'T')his guy wrote an article. That's it. No congressional hearings, no bills introduced, nothing more than one guy spouting off.


I think you are wrong about this. Columnists like Thomas Friedman or William Safire who frequently appear with their analysis in the NY Times are regarded as the most important American Political Annalists. Since different studies show the extensive political consequences of media frames, these comments do have effects in the American political landscape. Not something to just plainly ignore...
"In the U.S., fears are so exaggerated and out of control that anxiety is the number-one mental health problem in the country.", Barry Glassner
User avatar
VinceG
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 240
Joined: Tue 12 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Netherlands
Top

Unread postby threadbear » Sat 06 Aug 2005, 19:47:44

Lord, I hate neo-liberals as much as neo-cons. What is idiot Friedman's last book called? The World is Flat? Actually, it's Friedman who's flat. His examination of political economy is shallow and cursory, and his soul is a collection of false hopes wedged between the thin veneers of cardboard he uses to construct a theatrical lie about the effects of globalism.

This article shows the real dynamics underlying Friedman's stage managed production --the World is Flat.

Alexander Cockburn:

“The suicides”, Sainath says, “are a symptom of vast agrarian distress. For every farmer who has committed suicide there are thousands more facing the same huge crisis who have not taken their lives. In fact, we will never know how many suicides there have been, since there are so many ways of not counting them. We do know that in seven or eight states since ’97 and ’98 and most particularly since 2000 farmers have taken their lives by the thousand. In the single district of Anantapur, in the state of Andhra Pradesh, so beloved by the neoliberals because of its “reforms”, over 3,000 farmers have taken their lives between 1997/98 and 2003.

http://www.counterpunch.org/
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests