Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE War in Iraq Thread pt 2 (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby Jack » Thu 13 Jan 2005, 18:32:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JoeW', 'I') don't think many Americans outside those in our military would have that kind of courage if foreign tanks were patrolling our streets.


Hard to say. But there were Hungarian civilians that fought Russian tanks with potatoes. They lost, BTW.

Frankly, given the condition of our inner cities, I suspect the foreign tanks would be stripped for parts rather quickly. 8)
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby TrueKaiser » Thu 13 Jan 2005, 20:21:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') agree the the videos they create arent as well produced as the ones we see from a birds eye view of some bomber aircraft as hundreds or thousands of pounds of explosives careen towords a "identified target" in the middle town .
There are cultural differences reflected in these videos , but i cant see that one shows a more cival means to war . Both have a simular purpose and are only justified by the mind ofthe viewer. Neither video was created just for a grin . killing is killing is killing.


what about the shooting of missles into a unarmed crowd?
that killed a jurnelist and alot of unarmed iraq's. i don't call that saving.
as for the aid workers except the red cross or the red cresent the majority of them are christions who are there for two purposes
convert the heathens and then help them.
User avatar
TrueKaiser
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 503
Joined: Thu 28 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Whats an "Insurgent" ?

Unread postby hoplite » Fri 14 Jan 2005, 01:10:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BabyPeanut', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Muffloj', 'H')ow do you think Texas would react to being "liberated" by a foreign nation .

That would be very expensive. Do you know how much a deprogramming team costs per hour?



I just can't see very many Texans that would have the balls to charge an M1 Abrams firing an AK and screaming "Jesus is Great"...

These guys are rebels with a cause AND THEY FULLY BELIEVE THEY"VE GOT NOTHING TO LOSE. (They don't!)

Heres one major difference between Vietnamn and Iraq: In VietNamn the generals constantly exagerated the number of enemy dead. In Iraq, the rule of thumb is to deliberately UNDERESTIMATE the number of enemy KIA/Casualties.
User avatar
hoplite
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri 22 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby gg3 » Fri 14 Jan 2005, 03:42:44

According to the definitions used by a friend of mine in the Army, who is highly critical of official policies, JoeW is exactly correct.

Terrorists specifically target noncombatants. Insurgents specifically target combatants. Occasionally there is some crossover in outcomes, but that does not invalidate the generality.

BTW, originally, American policy on Iraq attempted to use the term "terrorists" for *both* types, and didn't like the use of the term "insurgents" because that lent a sense of legitimacy to the hostiles (i.e. granting that certain hostiles are engaged in warfare per se).
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Unread postby k_semler » Fri 14 Jan 2005, 15:46:17

Insurgent:

1. a person who takes part in an armed rebellion against the constituted authority (especially in the hope of improving conditions)

2. guerrilla: a member of an irregular armed force that fights a stronger force by sabotage and harassment

3. in opposition to a civil authority or government

1975 replay, anyone?
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington

Unread postby whereismymonkey » Sat 15 Jan 2005, 07:25:29

Insurgants are pissed off citizens who have nothing to loose. Our bombs/ bullets killed there mother, brother, sister, daughter, uncle, friend whatever. It destroyed there house, life ect. Without these so called pissed off citizens, i mean insurgents we have no justification in being in iraq anymore. The kill rate is about 1 : 100 US to iraqi "insurgant". I know that i personally would be rather homicidal and angry if i was in there situation.


Also some of the people here are generalising things to much. We have killed close to 100 000 iraqi's. The occasional random murderous attacks, on innocent people by "insurgants" are more than likely the hard core terroists. There are unfortunately a small percentage of true terroists there, the rest are pissed off citizens.
User avatar
whereismymonkey
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat 25 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby whereismymonkey » Sat 15 Jan 2005, 07:27:05

Insurgants are pissed off citizens who have nothing to loose. Our bombs/ bullets killed there mother, brother, sister, daughter, uncle, friend whatever. It destroyed there house, life ect. Without these so called pissed off citizens, i mean insurgents we have no justification in being in iraq anymore. The kill rate is about 1 : 100 US to iraqi "insurgant". I know that i personally would be rather homicidal and angry if i was in there situation.


Also some of the people here are generalising things to much. We have killed close to 100 000 iraqi's. The occasional random murderous attacks, on innocent people by "insurgants" are more than likely the hard core terroists. There are unfortunately a small percentage of true terroists there, the rest are pissed off citizens.
User avatar
whereismymonkey
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Sat 25 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Arianna Huffington: Iraq: The War We Are Not Being Shown

Unread postby Justamom » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 16:46:58

speaks for itself.... unfortunately....

Yahoo! News (link)
User avatar
Justamom
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby PlanComplete » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 17:12:35

Might as well use Saddam as your source. Or better yet Mr. Moore.
No doubt things are not being shown but just a google news search shows her claims that the information about the visit to Iran was not published, where plain wrong.

On the same token someone can use the following to say that you are right but in the wrong way



Link

Both are biased news sources.
User avatar
PlanComplete
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Arianna Huffington: Iraq: The War We Are Not Being Shown

Unread postby muhandis » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 17:27:58

One could say that Americans are living in an information vacuum with respect to the self-censorship of their press. Even the subtle differences between Canada and the US become vast when it comes to the evening news (although CanWest-Global does its best to tow the American line--! :-x ).

I think that it must be difficult for Americans to accept that they do not have a 'free' press. But then is the press ever 'free'? In any country? One should remember that the media are businesses, businesses turn profits. Profits are generated by sales and advertizing which comes from audience. News becomes just another form of entertainment.

Maybe the American press is just telling Americans what they would like to believe? What gives better sales -- bad news or happy stories? (although personal fear can also sell well (e.g., crime and justice)).

If I want news on Iraq, the US or British press are the last places to look.

muhandis
User avatar
muhandis
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon 12 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Re: Arianna Huffington: Iraq: The War We Are Not Being Shown

Unread postby PlanComplete » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 17:43:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('muhandis', '
')
If I want news on Iraq, the US or British press are the last places to look.

muhandis


And where is a better place? See your bias is based on bias. Germany, France ect want the news to justify there stance on not joining in the war.
America, UK want the news to show why they did go to war.
They are no more or less biased then one another.
My sister who is currently deployed there tells me all the time, many people are happy we are there, and many are not happy. Seems like even there you get the bias.
User avatar
PlanComplete
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby jockc » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 17:43:41

User avatar
jockc
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon 31 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 17:50:29

Truth, truth, truth, she wants to hear the truth.

Should somebody mail her every Peak Oil book and video in existance?

Does Huffington live in a world where energy is her birthright?

Would she care to be told that the truth is that it's her fault as much as anyone else who burns fossil fuels in order to live? If we all stopped doing that the war in Iraq would then serve no purpose but not a minute sooner.
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Unread postby PlanComplete » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 17:58:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BabyPeanut', 'T')ruth, truth, truth, she wants to hear the truth.

Should somebody mail her every Peak Oil book and video in existance?

Does Huffington live in a world where energy is her birthright?

Would she care to be told that the truth is that it's her fault as much as anyone else who burns fossil fuels in order to live? If we all stopped doing that the war in Iraq would then serve no purpose but not a minute sooner.


I second that, this war is about oil, but not because we want it... because we need it.
I seen a blog a few months ago wish I could find it again, said it better then I ever could. About how if the people realized it was oil we where after and more importantly why we where after the oil, they would not only support the war they would be chanting *Down with Iran* next instead of *No Blood For Oil*
User avatar
PlanComplete
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby smiley » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 18:13:01

You want the truth?

How is this truth?

Last month's (june) harvest.

But everything is going swell.

And everyone who tells otherwise is simply reading the wrong papers.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_code('', 'Sgt. Chad M. Mercer 25
Signaller Paul William Didsbury 18
Spc. Rafael A. Carrillo Jr. 21
Spc. Robert E. Hall Jr. 30
Sgt. Manny Hornedo 27
2nd Lt. Matthew S. Coutu 23
Chief Warrant Officer Keith R. Mariotti 39
Chief Warrant Officer Steven E. Shepard 30
Spc. Charles A. Kaufman 20
Cpl. Carlos Pineda 23
Lance Cpl. Holly A. Charette 21
Petty Officer 1st Class Regina R. Clark 43
Pfc. Veashna Muy 20
Sgt. 1st Class Christopher W. Phelps 39
Cpl. Chad W. Powell 22
Sgt. Joseph M. Tackett 22
Cpl. Ramona M. Valdez 20
Sgt. Arnold Duplantier II 26
Spc. Christopher L. Hoskins 21
Spc. Nicholas R. Idalski 23
Cpl. Marin Milev 25
Sgt. James D. Stewart 29
Spc. Brian A. Vaughn 23
Pfc. Christopher R. Kilpatrick 18
1st Lt. Noah Harris 23
Cpl. William A. Long 26
Lance Cpl. Adam J. Crumpler 19
Master Sgt. Robert M. Horrigan 40
Master Sgt. Michael L. McNulty 36
Lance Cpl. Erik R. Heldt 26
Capt. John W. Maloney 36
Hospital Corpsman 2nd Class Cesar O. Baez 37
Lance Cpl. Jonathan R. Flores 18
Cpl. Jesse Jaime 22
Lance Cpl. Chad B. Maynard 19
Cpl. Tyler S. Trovillion 23
Lance Cpl. Dion M. Whitley 21
Pfc. Nathan B. Clemons 20
Pvt. Paun Georgiev 30
Pfc. Michael R. Hayes 29
Sgt. Anthony G. Jones 25
Pvt. Tsvetan Kamov 25
Pfc. Joshua P. Klinger 21
Spc. Anthony D. Kinslow 21
Sgt. Larry R. Kuhns Jr. 24
Lance Cpl. John J. Mattek Jr. 24
Sgt. Larry R. Arnold Sr. 46
Spc. Casey Byers 22
Cpl. Stanley J. Lapinski 35
Spc. Terrance D. Lee Sr. 25
Sgt. 1st Class Neil A. Prince 35
Lance Cpl. Mario A. Castillo 20
Lance Cpl. Andrew J. Kilpela 22
Lance Cpl. Dustin V. Birch 22
Lance Cpl. Daniel Chavez 20
Staff Sgt. Mark O. Edwards 40
Lance Cpl. Thomas O. Keeling 23
Sgt. David J. Murray 23
Lance Cpl. Devon P. Seymour 21
Cpl. Brad D. Squires 26
1st Lt. Louis E. Allen 34
Sgt. Roberto Arizola Jr. 31
Capt. Phillip T. Esposito 30
1st Lt. Michael J. Fasnacht 25
Pfc. Douglas E. Kashmer 27
Lance Cpl. Marc L. Tucker 24
Spc. Eric T. Burri 21
Lt. Col. Terrence K. Crowe 44
Lance Cpl. Robert T. Mininger 21
Spc. Brian M. Romines 20
Lance Cpl. Jonathan L. Smith 22
Cpl. Carrie L. French 19
Spc. Eric J. Poelman 21
Pfc. Brian S. Ulbrich 23
Staff Sgt. Justin L. Vasquez 26
Col. Theodore S. Westhusing 44
Cpl. Antonio Mendoza 21
Linda J. Villar 41
Staff Sgt. Virgil R. Case 37
Spc. Phillip C. Edmundson 22
Pfc. Louis E. Niedermeier 20
Staff Sgt. Shamus O. Goare 29
Chief Warrant Officer Corey J. Goodnature 35
Senior Chief Petty Officer Daniel R. Healy 36
Sgt. Kip A. Jacoby 21
Lt. Cmdr. Erik S. Kristensen 33
Petty Officer 1st Class Jeffery A. Lucas 33
Lt. Michael M. McGreevy Jr. 30
Sgt. 1st Class Marcus V. Muralles 33
Petty Officer 2nd Class Eric S. Patton 22
Master Sgt. James W. Ponder III 36
Maj. Stephen C. Reich 34
Sgt. 1st Class Michael L. Russell 31
Chief Warrant Officer Chris J. Scherkenbach 40
Petty Officer 2nd Class James Suh 28
Petty Officer 1st Class Jeffrey S. Taylor 30
Lance Cpl. Kevin B. Joyce 19
Maj. Duane W. Dively 43
Spc. Anthony S. Cometa 21
Staff Sgt. Christopher N. Piper 43
Sgt. 1st Class Victor H. Cervantes 28
Pfc. Emmanuel Hernandez 22
Sgt. Michael J. Kelley 26
Staff Sgt. Leroy E. Alexander 27
Capt. Charles D. Robinson 29 ')
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Unread postby DomusAlbion » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 18:26:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smiley', 'Y')ou want the truth?

How is this truth?

Last month's (june) harvest.


I'd like to see a list of all the young people that overdosed on drugs and alcohol or were killed by gang/drug activity last month. :twisted:

Those are the ones that wasted their lives.

The young adults in the service knew what they might face and volunteered to serve.

I salute them.
"Modern Agriculture is the use of land to convert petroleum into food."
-- Albert Bartlett

"It will be a dark time. But for those who survive, I suspect it will be rather exciting."
-- James Lovelock
User avatar
DomusAlbion
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Wed 08 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Beyond the Pale
Top

Unread postby julianj » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 19:01:01

I tire of posting the same things, but here we go.

1. The US/UK forces lost the Iraq war some time ago, about the time of Abu Ghraib. Hearts and minds etc.

2. Most of Iraq is in the hands of the Iraqi Resistance. But Shiites are also fighting Sunni. There aren't enough US/UK forces to control the country.

3. There are virtually no "foreign fighters" except for US/UK forces and their mercenaries, sorry "contractors" 20-40,000 troops. It's the Iraqis doing the fighting against the invaders.

4. The Iraq army/police/security forces will *never* amount to anything - remember Vietnam? It's the ARVN all over again. When you hear about effective battalions, remember they are Kurdish Pershmerga, conducting ethnic cleansing. Some of the best troops you fight, you actually trained, then they defected and shoot at the US with your own weapons.

5. The Iraqi Resistance has infiltrated everywhere. US intel = zero.

6. The British forces - call us Perfidious Albion - have done a deal in Basra - and let the Islamic theocrats take control, on condition they let the oil flow and don't shoot up our troops. Fine, it works.

7. Any power which can't even control the Baghdad Airport Road, really ain't winning.

8. Note the new constitution, can you say Islamic State? Was that worth 300+ billion, Oil minus, and all those dead?

You can easily find this stuff out for yourself, if you like to, try www.antiwar.com for starters. I really doubt that the average Iraqi Resister watches Fox News.

I think we say, Deal with reality before reality deals with you.

Withdrawal of all US/UK forces is the only option. "We" are the problem, not the solution.
julianj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu 30 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: On one of the blades of the fan

Unread postby smiley » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 19:54:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ''')d like to see a list of all the young people that overdosed on drugs and alcohol or were killed by gang/drug activity last month. Twisted Evil


Don't worry folks.

At least the war in Irak is going better than the war on drugs.

*slams head against a wall
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Unread postby MicroHydro » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 20:13:41

How bad is US censorship? Well, I was able to get a realistic daily newspaper in the US only by ordering the Financial Times. Now let's be serious, this is the British equivalent of the Wall Street Journal, hardly a Marxist rag. But even the stuffy old establishment FT has vastly different reporting than the so called "liberal" US media, which are actually all rabidly nationalist and pro-war. America is as crazy as it is in large part due to the horrid state of American media, a toxic mix of propaganda and mindless tabloid stories. Even the so called "liberal" democrats in America believe completely in American exceptionalism and are pro-war.
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Arianna Huffington: Iraq: The War We Are Not Being Shown

Unread postby threadbear » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 20:26:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PlanComplete', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('muhandis', '
')
If I want news on Iraq, the US or British press are the last places to look.

muhandis


And where is a better place? See your bias is based on bias. Germany, France ect want the news to justify there stance on not joining in the war.
America, UK want the news to show why they did go to war.
They are no more or less biased then one another.
My sister who is currently deployed there tells me all the time, many people are happy we are there, and many are not happy. Seems like even there you get the bias.


This is a false argument. There is unconscious bias and there is deliberate distortion of the truth. They are neither morally equivalent or conceptually similar. Try taking up thinking for a hobby, Plans Complete. You might like it.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron