Well, there is huge precedent for this sort of thing (false reporting). During the terror campaign in Great Britain, Churchill's government did every to deny the fact that bombs were being dropped on London, until he was forced to admit it when casualties got too high. When Germany switched to the V2 rocket, the British government covered it up again. The V2 rocket didn't make a screeching noise (because it was supersonic), and thus, the government could cover this up.
During the Pacific Campaign, casaulties of each battle were a tightly guarded secret by the American Brass. If the general public knew the sorts of casualties their boys were taking, they would have opted out immediately. It wasn't until after the war was over that the full extent of American deaths/wounded were known. It also occurred in Vietnam, especially underreporting of the VC weaponry and tactics. It got so bad that the military began to believe their own propaganda. They were totally caught off guard by the Tet Offensive because they honestly didn't believe the VC was capable of such logistical feats.



