by Plantagenet » Thu 05 Oct 2017, 17:49:58
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'T')he guy was a drunk, womanizer, and gambler. That doesn't fit in with any practicing Mormons I know. This won't be a religious motive.
At least one religious group IS claiming he had a religious motivation. ISIS just released a THIRD claim the Las Vegas shooter was a convert to Islam and the attack was a jihad operation. We know ISIS had identified Las Vegas as a prime target attack....could this have been an ISIS terror attack as the ISIS statements claim?
Monday, 12 Muharram 1439H
A soldier from the soldiers of the Caliphate targeted a large gathering of 22,000 Americans at a concert in the city of Las Vegas, including nearly 600 killed and wounded
The executor of the operation, Abu Abdul Barr al-Amriki [al-Amriki = “The American”], 64-years old, converted to Islam 6 months ago
Method of Execution
The brother Abu Abdul Barr stationed himself for the invasion on the 32nd floor of a hotel overlooking a concert, and opened fire continuously on the crowds using 23 guns and more than 2000 rounds, and died, may Allah accept him, after exhausting his ammunition
Results of the Operation
59 killed
527 wounded
Panic and confusion of security in America and a number of European countriesPeople who follow this sort of thing say ISIS doesn't usually claim responsibility for attacks unless there is some legitimacy to their claim.
Its certainly possible ISIS had nothing to do with this.....but at this stage it might be too early to rule out that they did (even though the FBI released a statement ruling it out just after they started investigating the attack). The MSM isn't reporting on it, but Zerohedge has an article up right now about the new ISIS statement.

Was it an Islamic terror attack?