by ennui2 » Tue 26 Jan 2016, 16:24:58
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'N')either landfills nor fracting flares are under 500 meters of cold arctic ocean.
Just because something's hard doesn't mean it's impossible. That appears to be a fundamental philosophical difference between the two of us. No, I do not believe that innovation can overcome the laws of thermodynamics. But I don't think the thermodynamics of the problem is intractable yet. But don't ask me to engineer a solution myself because that's not my area of expertise.
For instance, look at what is going on with reusable rocketry right now. It wasn't thought possible to launch a payload into orbit and return the main stage back in a soft vertical landing, but the Falcon 9 can do this. The physics that allows this is very narrow. Everything has to be done just right. The physical science behind it has to be just right. It's threading a needle.
Now, when you just bang on the keyboard to say this or that simply can't be done, you're taking the easy road out by throwing your hands up. But that's not how industry works.
The reason horizontal drilling happened, or tar sands, or CTL, is because someone found out a way. And there is enough of an incentive to keep trying to find more or better ways that the underlying thermodynamics are NOT a constant. That is why I said there are unknown variables. To think otherwise is to be willfully ignorant.
Again, you will fall back to mockery, the internet equivalent of sticking out your tongue. Sorry, that's not a very compelling argument.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)