Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Terror / Terrorism Thread pt 4 (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby ennui2 » Sat 21 Nov 2015, 21:37:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '
')are you one of those loonies who thinks that Obama is the anti-Christ?


You mean like you? Oh, you just think he's a buffoon? Same difference. You get up each morning thinking of how many times you can mock the guy. To me, that is a form hate and extremism. In some respects, not that different from the qualities you are criticizing in extreme muslims. It just isn't physically violent. But you don't see the connection.

If people want to get along, they need to get beyond the us vs. them mentality, and extremely rigid ideology is part of the problem.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby onlooker » Sat 21 Nov 2015, 21:45:09

Well said Ennui
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f people want to get along, they need to get beyond the us vs. them mentality, and extremely rigid ideology is part of the problem.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Sat 21 Nov 2015, 22:20:23

From where I sit, the right wing whack jobs and the left wing whack jobs are about equally crazy.

For what it is worth, I don't think that any POTUS of either major party has ever wanted to go to war. Lincoln did everything he could to heal the Union. Woodrow Wilson did not want to jump into a European war that was already years old, until Germany repeatedly sank US shipping headed for Europe. FDR was doing everything he could to remain neutral in Europe, when the 3rd nation of the Axis Powers struck Pearl Harbor. GWB was genuinely shocked by the attack on 9/11/2001.

Arguably, Eisenhower got us into both Korea and Vietnam. But with his background as a savvy Supreme Allied Commander in WW2 and first NATO Commander, he knew that unlimited nuclear war was unthinkable and a limited war unwinnable. He negotiated an armistice in Korea that remains in place 62 years later. He only ever authorized 900 unarmed "technical advisers" in Vietnam, JFK preserved the stalemate, and LBJ decided he had to "win" and escalated. (LBJ was but a Naval Reserve Lt. Commander, awarded the Silver Star by McArthur for riding in a combat plane as an observer. Then he was forcibly retired and entered government service - he had wanted to go into combat with no command experience, and McArthur had recognized a dangerous nut job.)

Eisenhower warned of the "military industrial complex" and gave good advice on how to avoid problems.

Obama simply lacks any military savvy whatsoever - and thinks that he can retreat until he wins, and that it is OK to have anonymous death fall from the sky as a drone-fired missile, and has repeatedly and seemingly routinely slaughtered women and children. Obama has made more Muslim martyrs than anyone, and he is the most likely POTUS to get us into a major war that we have ever had.

To anyone that feels discomfort today - you are entirely justified, our nation has never been in greater danger.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 21 Nov 2015, 23:23:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '
')Arguably, Eisenhower got us into both Korea and Vietnam.


The Korean War was already underway when Eisenhower was elected President, so that one belongs to Truman.

The US was provided aid to Vietnam under Eisenhower, but in 1961 JFK put 3000 US troops into combat in Vietnam, marking the date of the beginning of the Vietnam War for the US. The First US battlefield casualty in the Vietnam War occurred in December 1961. The Viet Nam war belongs to Kennedy and Johnson.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 21 Nov 2015, 23:53:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '
')are you one of those loonies who thinks that Obama is the anti-Christ?


he's a buffoon...mock the guy.... hate and extremism... extremely rigid ideology....


Gosh...you really are wound up about this.

ennu---relax. Obama isn't the antichrist and he's not a saint---he's just a human being like the rest of us. :idea:

Image
Relax mos----Obama is definitely NOT the antichrist :lol:
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Sun 22 Nov 2015, 00:19:26

Talk about the antichrist (a word only used once in the Bible IIRC) always reveals the "Christians" don't read their Bible, because Christians will fall over each other rushing to worship the the antichrist. I mean, he'd hardly qualify as an antichrist if Christians didn't line up to worship him. It's the Christian fundamentalists who will be the foot soldiers of the antichrist. Oh, and of course the antichrist will mix religion and politics - the Bible is quite specific about that.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby ennui2 » Sun 22 Nov 2015, 13:31:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '
')Obama simply lacks any military savvy whatsoever


The truism in politics is that everyone's a back-seat driver who holds, in his head, a fantasy scenario of the road not taken.

How many years did hawks still cling to the idea if we just kept bombing Vietnam back to the stone age we could have "won"? Some probably still do.

That's the illusion of the road not taken.

It's comforting to think that the guy in charge just isn't doing it right and if he had done it YOUR way, then it would be happily ever after. Unfortunately, there's no way to have tested that theory out, because by definition, we didn't take that approach. So it's ultimately fantasy-thinking.

We do know that the Soviet Union had a pure hawkish attitude with Afghanistan that failed.

We also know that Bush tried a pure hawkish attitude and it failed. People can point to statistics during the surge to try to make it seem like Iraq was being pacified, but what we know about the middle-east is that the extremists there play a "long game". They are perfectly content to wait us out, even for years, and then start up again once we leave.

If that's the case, if they see this narrative in terms of decades or even centuries, then a military solution can't work, because the US would bankrupt itself on blood and treasure trying to keep things under control.

In that scenario, yes, some form of containment is the only policy. You do the minimum to quarantine the dickheads to stay in their own shit-hole and not cause problems outside of it.

There is no way to do anything other than pull up the drawbridge as the world progressively turns into a shit-hole anyway.

If there's a problem with Obama's strategy, it's following a political correctness script in regards to refugees. I'm not saying we can't let any in, but we have to be very very strict with the vetting.
"If the oil price crosses above the Etp maximum oil price curve within the next month, I will leave the forum." --SumYunGai (9/21/2016)
User avatar
ennui2
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3920
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011, 10:37:02
Location: Not on Homeworld
Top

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby Newfie » Sun 22 Nov 2015, 13:49:08

Ennui,

IIRC from many years ago you live in Greece or the Med?

I tend to agree. I think the EU is taking exactly the wrong approach. Instead of re-erecting the borders within the EU, they should be stregthening the EU's exterior borders.

Then again I kinda think the same of the USA. Which doesn't make me real popular with my Left wing buddies. But what are borders for, fundamentally? If you are not going to protect them then why have them? And what does citizenship mean? If you water down the meaning then it's not meaningful.

To go back to the "false flag" idea, what it is essentially talking about is having a clear idea of the route causes and meanings. To not be distracted but to calmly assess over the breadth of history and to project wisely into the future. We, Western Culture seem to absolutely suck at that.

IS folks are thinking very long term, Dieing today does not matter because we will glory in the afterlife. Eternity is a long time.

Perhaps our short term thinking is a consequence of consumerisim. My parents were something of hoarders, and I have a bit of that. I see something I can do something with, I see it as useful and it is hard to throw it away. But in our consumer society few things have enduring value. They give way to the next big thing, the new iGadget, the new OS, the next season, or release. We seldom construct anything physical with our hands. We have little of practical value to pas on to our kids. I'm an atheist so I can't even pass on the value of an after life.

If I have nothing of value to pass to my kids was my life of any value?

Perhaps this distorts our planning and sense of values.

Perhaps it leaves a void that folks like IS can fill for all too many?
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sun 22 Nov 2015, 14:30:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', '
')How many years did hawks still cling to the idea if we just kept bombing Vietnam back to the stone age we could have "won"? Some probably still do.


Yup.

You're 100% right----theres a lot of that exact same kind of mentality still in DC now and its still causing problems even today. For instance, you can see the same kind of thinking in Obama's insistence that a bombing campaign is the only way to "contain" ISIS in Syria. Obama clings to the idea even after ISIS has expanded to Libya and Mali and Nigeria and ISIS terrorists are becoming more active--- bring down a plane in Egypt and undertaking a terror attack in Paris in just the last month.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Sun 22 Nov 2015, 15:41:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '
')Obama simply lacks any military savvy whatsoever - and thinks that he can retreat until he wins, and that it is OK to have anonymous death fall from the sky as a drone-fired missile, and has repeatedly and seemingly routinely slaughtered women and children. Obama has made more Muslim martyrs than anyone, and he is the most likely POTUS to get us into a major war that we have ever had.

To anyone that feels discomfort today - you are entirely justified, our nation has never been in greater danger.


Luckily, America has people like you who type the exact comment week after week, year after year. We all sleep better knowing you are on the job, sir.

There was a classic post on the blog Kung Fu Monkey during the Bush years about the terrorism hysterics.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') am absolutely buffaloed by the people who insist I man up and take it in the teeth for the great Clash of Civilizations -- "Come ON, people, this is the EPIC LAST WAR!! You just don't have the stones to face that fact head-on!" -- who at the whiff of an actual terror plot will, with no apparent sense of irony, transform and run around shrieking, eyes rolling and Hello Kitty panties flashing like Japanese schoolgirls who have just realized that the call is coming from inside the house!
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby onlooker » Mon 23 Nov 2015, 10:44:20

I found this quote by Gore Vidal
"You can't have a war on terrorism because that's not a actual enemy, it's an abstract. It's like having a war on dandruff. That war will be eternal and pointless. It's idiotic.

That's not a war, it's a slogan. it's a lie. It's advertising, which is the only art form we ever invented in America. And we use it to sell soap, wars and presidential candidates in the same fashion." End quote.
Again nobody is denying terrorist acts are occurring and terrorists exist. What my OP was about is how the West in fact instigated this state of affairs because it was convenient both abroad and at home. Especially taking into account the much more serious and fundamental threats related to the environment and the economy hovering over all the planet and its people and yet the MSM focuses obsessively with terrorism.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby Cog » Mon 23 Nov 2015, 10:53:00

Seeing people slaughtered in the street by ISIS is a bit more concrete than the more abstract doom 10 years from now. Do you really blame people for being frightened more by the former and not the latter?
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby onlooker » Mon 23 Nov 2015, 11:03:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'S')eeing people slaughtered in the street by ISIS is a bit more concrete than the more abstract doom 10 years from now. Do you really blame people for being frightened more by the former and not the latter?

No Cog I do not blame the people who for the most part are blissfully unaware of these other threats. I do blame the powers that be and their compliant mouthpieces the Media.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA
Top

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby Cog » Mon 23 Nov 2015, 11:19:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'S')eeing people slaughtered in the street by ISIS is a bit more concrete than the more abstract doom 10 years from now. Do you really blame people for being frightened more by the former and not the latter?

No Cog I do not blame the people who for the most part are blissfully unaware of these other threats. I do blame the powers that be and their compliant mouthpieces the Media.


Ok that is a reasonable position. Let me expand upon mine. The US and other Western powers have interfered in the ME because they have a lot of oil. We want access to it and don't want any single player from interfering with our access to it. Thusly, we have stuck our nose into just about everywhere over there that has one drop of oil.

I'm not going to completely discount Islam's desire to impress their religion on everyone else in the world. That is their goal. But their ability to do so would have been lessened had we not interfered so much in the ME.

Where do we go from here? I had no problem with tyrants like Saddam, Ghaddafi, or Assad. No reason to overthrow them really. But we did and now we are reaping the price of doing so. At this point, we have to kill people who want our heads on a stick.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan
Top

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby onlooker » Mon 23 Nov 2015, 11:37:42

Okay that is a reasonable post Cog which I accept. By the way have a great day.
"We are mortal beings doomed to die
User avatar
onlooker
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 10957
Joined: Sun 10 Nov 2013, 13:49:04
Location: NY, USA

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby davep » Mon 23 Nov 2015, 12:16:29

8O

:-D
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby Cog » Mon 23 Nov 2015, 12:19:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('onlooker', 'O')kay that is a reasonable post Cog which I accept. By the way have a great day.


You as well. Just a reminder the Royals won the World Series against the Mets. Just making sure you had heard about that. :-D
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan
Top

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby careinke » Mon 23 Nov 2015, 21:49:03

[quote="PlantagenetImage
Muhammad (the guy with his hair on fire) ordering a temple and its idols destroyed.[/quote]

It is forbidden to have images of Mohamed (Peace be upon him). Expect a fatwa on you shortly. Sorry.
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 23 Nov 2015, 22:02:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('careinke', '
')It is forbidden to have images of Mohamed (Peace be upon him). Expect a fatwa on you shortly. Sorry.


Shhhh!......don't tell anyone but I'm already risking a fatwa for drawing a tiny cartoon image of Muhammad on the sole of my running shoe.

Image
You OK in there Muhammad? OK---hang on tight....here we go.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: War on Terrorism = false flag

Unread postby careinke » Mon 23 Nov 2015, 22:19:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('careinke', '
')It is forbidden to have images of Mohamed (Peace be upon him). Expect a fatwa on you shortly. Sorry.


Shhhh!......don't tell anyone but I'm already risking a fatwa for drawing a tiny cartoon image of Muhammad on the sole of my running shoe.

Image
You OK in there Muhammad? OK---hang on tight....here we go.


And you put it inside a Jewish star, Bravo! :)
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron