by Outcast_Searcher » Tue 18 Aug 2015, 13:15:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Apneaman', 'Y')ou don't know why obviously because you are not providing any information or any evidence to refute the claim - just wasting a forum post on a very fucking lame amateurish, childish ad hominem. I think d is more or less using the study to support a moral position, but at least he is offering something other than basically calling anyone who disagrees a po po head. What is it that disturbs you so?
What disturbs me is:
1). You make an ad-hom name calling attack.
2). You do this while calling out the attackee for a supposed ad hom.
3). You spell poo (or pooh) as po. You didn't learn about poo, and how to use it in say, the 3rd grade? (Or were you cleverly trying to define "irony", and provide an example?)
4). You seem disturbed to the point of being fighting mad, while claiming the attackee is disturbed? Ever hear of projection?
Generally, what disturbs me about the left wing "morally superior" POV is how frequently its purveyors stoop to the ludicrously ironic while attacking those supposedly "less moral", and see that as somehow justified or even "good".
Grow the heck up. There are other points of views besides your own.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.