by allenwrench » Tue 23 Sep 2008, 09:42:13
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'I')s peak oil the "tip of the iceberg?"
How many see peak oil as a symptom of a greater disease? ?
The main problem is we have built our society on steroids. We have built an artificial, non sustainable model for our world. There is not much alternative either way when it comes to billions of people.
Do we make gargantuan hell hole cities and pile every one in these concrete high rise monsters? Or spread the people out and use some fuel to cart em around?
Either way we are sunk.
I posted about population control to another group and one responder commented "if eating babies is right I want to be wrong."
Well, I have no answer as to how to go about pop control, but I can see we have too many people in our world for the limited resources that are available.
If the world was a perfect entity, no, the gov should not dictate pop control...but we are far from perfect.
Our future existence on this planet will demand some form of pop control, but I think nature will take care of that problem in the not so distant future.
The public just won't not go for pop control...too UN-American...goes against our religious upbringings...too controversial and all of the rest. I can hear the cries now...Communist!...Atheist!...Baby Killer....Hitler....Impeach the President!!!!
I think nature will help us humans out with that hard decision - for nature does not discriminate nor find the truth too controversial or provocative or opinionated to be true. And in the end, nature will settle the dispute of population control with even handed justice by removing excess population just as it does with all its species, ever reminding us all that nature does not bow to man...it is always man that bows to nature.