by Outcast_Searcher » Sun 02 Aug 2015, 14:00:48
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'I') guess you never heard of NPOs?
NPO's are all about legally avoiding taxes (and sometimes illegally).
NPO's want to legally avoid taxes in order to benefit their owners and people with a vested interest in them (like beneficiaries, members, etc) with as much money (their PROFIT -- whether it's called that or not) as possible.
So NPO's aren't fundamentally different than for-profit corporations in wanting to maximize their income (profit). The difference is that politically (both in terms of policy favors and in terms of perception) they get a pass.
http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/n844.pdfExamples:
1). Churches avoid paying taxes, and often pay a huge proportion of their profits (from the collection plate) in terms of salaries and non-salary benefits like nice houses and other amenities to the people that run them. So it's not "profit", but it's maximizing income by legal tax avoidance. Something the left would despise in a for-profit corporation. (And something many of the church members often despise themselves, when it is abused).
2). Pick any from a large group of 501(c)(3) charitable organizations. There are all kinds of games, from hiring outfits which telemarket and take a HUGE proportion of checks received, and taking their cut of course -- to hiding income from events run under the organization's mantle for the (illegal tax sheltering) benefit of those who run it. (My state's chess organization comes to mind.

)
http://www.irs.gov/Charities-&-Non-Prof ... tion-501(c)(3)-Organizations
I guess you never thought about the real nature of NPO's in a balanced way? Were you assuming all NPO's were totally in it for charity with NO benefit in mind to the NPO or the people who run it?
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.