Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Years

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Henriksson » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 17:24:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', 'T')hink the EROEI on building a new robot would probably be more than a puny little human being?

Electronics is more energy-efficient than biological machines. And so our human-fleet will be inevitably replaced.
Henriksson
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed 30 Jul 2014, 08:23:55

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 17:28:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'I')t doesn't really matter if I'm worried. This thread is about what Musk said. Musk says it will happen. Musk is a smart guy. He founded Paypay and revolutionized space travel and electric cars. He is a physicist and is really smart. He knows what Google is doing . Musk says we will go to Mars and his rocket engines are the best and Musk says the robots with the AI will kill us all.


(Dino -- ok congratulations, you guys have finally got Musk on something, yes he's overboard on the robot doom. But he's a visionary and Most Interesting Man In The World and alpha dog on everything else. Cut the guy some slack. He's not God. He can be right about 90 things, maybe not 100 things ok?)

If you're smart enough to invest in a 3d organ printing company, and from everything else you post I know you're smart, then I'd like to know YOUR opinion on this. Musk isn't God, what does DINO think about it?

Why don't you want to say. Are you embarassed to say you're worried about the AI, too?

It'll be okay, Dino. I've already posted about it all and explored every angle to it. And I conclude it will be okay. I'm concerned about something like a stuxnet with the capacity to evolve -- but this isn't Megadoom stuff, look folks, we can handle this for goodness sake.

Bigger picture AI doom, nah, it'll work out okay and be fine. The singularity is coming, yes it will change all of our lives, but it will be gradual enough for countermeasures to arise to new threats.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')k, but I guess you don't believe in Musk anymore. He says you should be worried and not trust your android woman if it has the AI.


Dino -- there is nobody in this world that I agree with all the time, on everything.

Musk isn't God and he's not my twin either, so it was bound to happen there would be something I do not agree with him about.

I think for myself. I don't need him to tell me to be worried, anymore than I need a preacher to scare fire and brimstone into me. Musk should take the tech doom over to Pat Robertson on the 700 Club, they'd eat this stuff up. "Summoning the devil," good grief, he sounds like a nut. 8O

His tone on this tech doomer stuff is a bit more like Howard Hughes than a Hank Reardon (atlas shrugged).

I wonder why he's doing it. When he's positive, and forward thinking, he's got so many people inspired. It's built a company underneath his feet, people inspired by him, people in NASA too that truth be told they've rooted for spacex and have been helping them since the start.

We don't need this doom from him, and honestly I am disappointed by it.

We need the other Elon Musk. The proud American. The guy that's worried about Russia, and Putin. The guy that's like a Henry Ford and a Werner Von Braun -- that's the Musk we need.

We need him to be a Hank Reardon, because we really are in the days of Atlas Shrugged.

I don't like to see this dark stuff from him, I hope he stops it, he's gonna ruin his public image. Leave the doom to others. We want hope from Musk, the world has enough doomers, it's the hope that makes Musk special. He sells hope -- the Tesla, Spacex, so wtf is this dark "summoning the devil" 700 club stuff now. That sh*t is depressing, good grief Musk drop it. :(

I'm tellin' ya, you can take this to the bank and cash it, if he does keep it up with this robot doom stuff then he's gonna ruin his public image, and I won't like him so much anymore either. Maybe this will be his fall. His turn toward Howard Hughes crazy. :cry:

Everyone still liked Hughes after he went crazy, but he wasn't taken seriously anymore.

I dunno we'll see what happens. Maybe Musk is so successful he has to stick his own foot in his mouth sometimes and look like an idiot about something at least, even if it's robot doom. Maybe after everyone gets done laughing at him, he'll be really pissed off about that and egohurt, and will work five times harder on spacex -- so that would be good, anyhow. :lol:

(I just call it like I see it -- he's been right about everything else -- but he's too dark and doomer on this one. He's not sounding positive about the Singularity, like he wants it to work out. I don't like this "you're summoning the devil" stuff.

He's been right about everything else, that hyperloop is not stupid, that thing is sound and would be great. He was right on everything about rockets, though maybe he actually can't get resuable landing stages done as fast as he hopes to.

The man has been right all his life, about everything, and it's made him billions and famous -- but he's gonna have a fall now and then, he is human. This robot doom crap is his fall. He's gone overboard about it. He's ruining his public image, the tech hope and optimisim, that's no good for him and no good for his companies so why is he doing it.

America needs Musk the next Henry Ford, the next Werner von Braun, the next Hank Reardon. Not this other scary stuff. Fear is weak, I didn't think he was weak, I'm honestly surprised.)
Last edited by Sixstrings on Fri 21 Nov 2014, 17:44:37, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Quinny » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 17:41:32

Where do you get that from?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Henriksson', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', 'T')hink the EROEI on building a new robot would probably be more than a puny little human being?

Electronics is more energy-efficient than biological machines. And so our human-fleet will be inevitably replaced.
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Timo » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 18:28:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'B')ut he's a visionary and Most Interesting Man In The World and alpha dog on everything else. Cut the guy some slack. He's not God.


Sixstrings, THAT'S heresy! You WILL be damned!

Best of luck to you.
Timo
 
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby dinopello » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 18:29:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Quinny', 'T')hink the EROEI on building a new robot would probably be more than a puny little human being?


It's highly variable. Making a human I mean. Some of us put more energy into it than others. :wink:

BTW, this TV commercial always cracks me up
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 19:02:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Timo', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'B')ut he's a visionary and Most Interesting Man In The World and alpha dog on everything else. Cut the guy some slack. He's not God.


Sixstrings, THAT'S heresy! You WILL be damned!

Best of luck to you.


You know, I like this guy a lot, but I actually would not want to work for him. From what I've read.

He fired the founder of tesla. The guy was interviewed and said that the way Musk works, if he decides you can't do a job, then there is no proving yourself or talking out of it, you're just gone.

And then I read he fired 400 employees from spacex because they were at the bottom of a performance review, and then they sued him.

That's a tricky line there, there's something to be said for ruthlessness in demanding the best and build the best business but then you can also get into major morale problems once hundreds are fired like that.

More recent stuff I read though suggests that spacex is maturing into a real aerospace company, and not such a maverick anymore.

Bottom line on it -- it's major accomplishment, he's cut launch costs to orbit by a half and a quarter and wants to cut it further. This is big big stuff for space development.

There's another good profile out about the company in the news, I didn't have time to read it all but scanned it. Just how they do everything. They started all this with fresh eyes in the industry, so they'd run across things like a vendor wanting $50,000 for a part and they'd just say "well wtf we can make that for $2,000 in the shop." Whereas NASA engineers "never think about what something costs."

And they actually have a more Russian design philosphy -- iterative. Test it as you go, bit by bit. Launch it, it crashes, learn from it, fix it fly it again.

Whereas old school NASA is about a master plan in advance "executed to completion to the letter" and so that's what causes the massive cost overruns.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 19:55:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Henriksson', 'E')lectronics is more energy-efficient than biological machines. And so our human-fleet will be inevitably replaced.


Not replaced, we'll merge. (future generations, anyhow)

Image
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 20:09:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', '[')url=http://www.marketmenot.com/wink-robot-butler-commercial/]BTW, this TV commercial always cracks me up[/url]


Ha, those are hilarious I'd never seen that before.

It just goes to show you how ingrained this already is, fear of the robots yet everyone is gonna want to have one.

The company making those ads is competing against a product *that does not even exist yet*, but the catch is that's where it's going. People would rather have the robot than the phone app, actually. What they're really doing in those ads is tying the aspiration to own a robot, to this rather dull and boring app.

In those commercials, the robot is actually a pain in the rear and dependent. Like a pet. And that could wind up true at first too, the first household robots may be more pets than anything. Depending on us. People love pets, they just do, they want something to take care of.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://www.fairwaysagedcare.com.au/wp-content/uploads/ParoRobot.jpg[/img]

Would you consider a robot pet for company?

And now scientists are designing therapeutic robotic animals to be used for dementia patients. The robotic animals apparently lower anxiety and improve the mood of dementia patients. These animals replicate pets in many ways, and have shown startling results with initial studies. They are washable, don’t need feeding, and generally behave well!

That’s better than any pet I’ve ever owned!

Paro, as the robotic seal is known, was developed by Japanese engineers, and costs around $5000. It is already commercially used in several countries.

Griffith University researchers are hoping to prove the cost effectiveness of animal robots in the treatment of dementia and build on a previous study which found positive benefits for the patient, if a grant application is successful.
http://www.fairwaysagedcare.com.au/would-you-consider-a-robot-pet-for-company/


So see, you really can't predict this so easily. Robots and AI will be *what we want them to be*. Maybe not dominant after all, if that's not what we want, maybe people want an AI that's dependent on them too. A member of the family.

We don't have the manpower, or economic priorities, to assign a human to keep every aged elder company and look after them and be with them 24/7.

But we could make a robot to do that.

And handle the nursing part of it too, and there goes the nursing jobs, but that's another issue. (and at least a robot wouldn't abuse your parent, you really don't know about some of these nurses, it's horrible care quite often)

If a robot can improve an elderly person's quality of life, and they're not so lonely and all alone in a nursing bed all day, then isn't that a good thing?
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby dinopello » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 20:25:23

If you or Elon Musk want to really understand the state of the art in AI you should talk to (or listen to) Michael Jordan

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')pectrum: Turning now to some other topics, if you were talking to someone in Silicon Valley, and they said to you, “You know, Professor Jordan, I’m a really big believer in the singularity,” would your opinion of them go up or down?

Michael Jordan: I luckily never run into such people.

Spectrum: Oh, come on.

Michael Jordan: I really don’t. I live in an intellectual shell of engineers and mathematicians.

Spectrum: But if you did encounter someone like that, what would you do?

Michael Jordan: I would take off my academic hat, and I would just act like a human being thinking about what’s going to happen in a few decades, and I would be entertained just like when I read science fiction. It doesn’t inform anything I do academically.

Spectrum: Okay, but knowing what you do academically, what do you think about it?

Michael Jordan: My understanding is that it’s not an academic discipline. Rather, it’s partly philosophy about how society changes, how individuals change, and it’s partly literature, like science fiction, thinking through the consequences of a technology change. But they don’t produce algorithmic ideas as far as I can tell, because I don’t ever see them, that inform us about how to make technological progress.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 21:02:46

Ok I'm dialoguing with myself again as Kaiser says, but here's another thought.

Why all this assumption that AI would ensure its self interest by FIGHTING us?

That is the path of MOST resistance and least survival prospects, not the path of least resistance.

Rather than an evil Terminator movies AI, it's just as possible that an AI would ensure its survival by playing on our emotions.

Look at pet dogs and what people spend on vet bills. They go without healthcare themselves, sometimes, to make sure the dog is taken care of.

It would be far less work and trouble and greater success probably for the AI to make us love it, rather than fight us.

An intelligent survival-interested AI could evolve THAT way -- playing on our emotions, our need for companionship, our pack animal tribe / family mentality.

Do sentient PEOPLE just fight each other, for no reason at all? Just psycho, out of nowhere? Sometimes. If there's a fault in the programming (dna). Or, if the sentient carbon based robot (human) was mistreated.

So why assume a TRUE sentient artificial intelligence is malevolent? In Dino's Star Trek example, that AI had too much power, with the mind of a child. Would you give a child so much power? Of course not.

We'll just have to raise these AI's right, that's all, same as raising kids or a pet dog.

(this whole topic, and Musk too, is just way ahead of itself. It's like in Star Trek -- there's a long way to go from Majel Barrett the friendly ship supercomputer to then commander data the android, and THEN finally an emotion chip for Data.

We'll have the former, before the latter. A more Majel Barrett kind of sentience -- not fully self aware and emotions and self interest, just exremely helpful and smart and able to to talk to us back and forth.

The "skynet" fears are about that kind of AI then spontaneously becoming self aware, but really, that ain't gonna happen. We humans worry about stuff all the time that actually never happens, like ebola just mutating suddenly out of nowhere. Possible? Remotely. Likely? No. What is more probable is what is likely.

NOW -- if they do accomplish a full human brain neuronal mind kind of replication, and actually create full sentience, then that's like creating a child. It will have to learn, it'll be whatever AI it is raised to be. Ethics and morality though require EMOTION -- as does sentience, by some definitions, survival instinct is emotional. So anyhow emotion is then another issue, you'd have to simulate that. In our brain that's our core brain functions at the center, our "lizard" brain, the basic parts that first evolved and then the higher functions came later.

What's interesting about AI is that actually it's the higher functions evolved first. But are those dangerous. It's the lizard brain stuff that can be dangerous -- feeling fear, hate, etc. But then modeling that would have its advantages as well, it would make the AI like a mammal and could have emotion and loyalty to us as a dog does -- we know our dog won't bite us, whereas if you have a pet boa then it really could just eat you.)
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 21:35:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'M')ichael Jordan: I luckily never run into such people.


Oh sheesh, what a tool.

Science fiction writers have actually predicted EVERYTHING. It's stunning.

Science fiction is about not only predicting where science is leading, in a broad sense, but more importantly it's about the MORALITY of it and how new tech is used and whether that's good for us or not.

So he says the singularity is just science fiction.

But what about when it actually happens, when processing power equals the neurons in our brain. Is this scientist saying that it will be impossible to then replicate our brain? That it's impossible to replicate the functions of an amygdala, etc. etc.?

Our brain is just neurons, that's all it is. It's a network. Sentient AI is coming, that's a sure thing.

There are a lot of scientists in the world, but only a few great scientists and those are the Hawkings and the Eisnteins.

P.S. Dino -- if you're an investor, then all you really care about is if somebody makes something that even sorta kinda seems like a sentient AI. This isn't an all or nothing kind of thing.

Every year, IBM keeps working on Deep Blue, and it gets better.

Look at stuxnet. Watch a documentary on that some time, it's wild how advanced that virus was. Here's the next step on that: a virus like that, that can EVOLVE and change. You and "Michael Jordan" may say its impossible, but wait and see, the NSA will find some crack engineers and scientists that will make it possible.

They used to say you can never split the atom. Some still say we'll never fuse atoms. They used to say, you'll never find the god particles with those colliders.

They said we'd never get to the moon. They said 3d printers will never work out. They used to say you can't sail off into the ocean, thar be dragons there. They used to say man can't go into space and survive, his eyes would pop out. On and on and on, everyone, every single "it can't be done" naysayer has ALWAYS been wrong.

It's not a question of "can it be done," it's just a question of when and how long will it take, and how much money. And being smart enough to recognize someone that is able to get it done.

If it doesn't violate the laws of physics, then it's just an engineering challenge, that's all.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby dinopello » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 22:09:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', ' ')all you really care about is if somebody makes something that even sorta kinda seems like a sentient AI.


I resemble that remark.

Anhow, that got off topic, this thread is about Elon Musk and how he knows that the robots are coming to kill us all

Image
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 23:19:26

Ah, but it's worse, THIS is what is going to doom us.

Because rather than being worried about being killed by robots, we should be worried about breeding ourselves to death.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 21 Nov 2014, 23:35:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'I') resemble that remark.

Anhow, that got off topic, this thread is about Elon Musk and how he knows that the robots are coming to kill us all


:lol:

I'm just trying to figure your angle out. Is it:

a) you think AI sentience / a smart piece of software that can have a conversation with you is silly

or

b) elon musk's "HAL 9000 will kill us all, we're 'summoning the devil'" is silly

You're not really making a full argument about anything Dino, you're just poking at Musk but I don't get what your argument is, exactly.

And what I mean by an investors' viewpoint, is just generally that, even if some new thing out there is of no interest to YOU -- then a smart person can see how it will work and be of great interest / benefit to OTHERS.

Now I know you're smart, so what exactly is your position, is it that sentient AI is so far off let's not even talk about it, or do you categorically say it's impossible, what is your stance on it?

I think a lot of people discount things out of hand, because they don't see the immediate interest in it for THEM, that's all.

Like "oh why go to the darn outer planets and see what's in the Europan ocean, who cares, what's for dinner, let's go to kentucky fried chicken"

P.S. Dino I'm just trying to figure your argument out. There's something about this that's rubbing you the wrong way, so just say it.

If you've got criticisms of Musk and you think he's a crackpot, then let's talk business nuts and bolts and talk about what he is actually doing in business. Etc.

I'm just saying let's get a little deeper than "oh, that stupid hyperloop, nobody takes him seriously."

I don't understand how anyone can have read about Musk, and not take the man seriously, or not grasp how massive some of these advances are. The cheaper rockets, like 1/4 the cost of old launches. That's a very big deal.

He can't make a cheap car (yet) and may never need to, but he sure found a niche with rockets, he's busted into that industry making a better product and a quarter or half the price to boot.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 00:10:26

I mean, let's just have some respect for Musk, that's all.

He's another Von Braun or Henry Ford.

He's done some new things that are pushing several industries forward, most of all aerospace. What more could you ask from someone, sheesh, any one of his successes would be enough for a lifetime.

And I think I read he said these "robots will kill us" stuff was in emails and in informal talks, he never meant it to be published.

So now the latest is he says he'll do a blog on it and expand his thoughts.

But why do we care anyway, relax people, he's not the Oracle at Delphi ok? He can spout off on something and maybe it's not too deep or important.

Look at what he does. He's actually a doer not a talker, so, just look at what he does. It's guys like Branson that are such talkers. Talk, talk, talk -- Musk has delivered. The merlin engine. Dragon crew vehicle, on the way, will be carrying US astronauts. Falcon Heavy, biggest rocket since the Saturn V, on the way.

Model X tesla, with its falcon wing doors, on the way. The man gets it done, folks, he says he'll do something and he does it.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby dinopello » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 00:19:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', '
')
Anyhow, that got off topic, this thread is about Elon Musk and how he knows that the robots are coming to kill us all


:lol:

I'm just trying to figure your angle out.


A reasonably well seeded connection machine might have figured it out. That's the fun of it, no? Perhaps another hidden layer ? Sometimes confabulation can be helpful.

In this thread I discuss Musk and his warnings of homicidal robot(s)

Image
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 00:36:21

Well okay it's your thread, fair enough.

I would just say that a spruce goose didn't invalidate Howard Hughes' other successes.

Spacex is so exciting.. I don't care if solar city flops or tesla never makes it after all, who gives a flip. I don't care if Musk goes a little nuts talking about doom robots, as long as he keeps making those rockets and comes through on the price he says he will.

So far they are.

SpaceX, an American company with American employees making ALL their stuff in the USA, is the lowest cost launch to orbit provider in the entire world. When everyone else said they couldn't make a rocket engine in America, and they had to use Russian engines, Musk went out and did it. When everyone else was okay that we needed the soyuz to get our guys to space, Musk was not okay with it, he said that was ridiculous and now he's solved that problem. When everyone else was okay with the Mars mission getting canceled, Musk was not okay with it, and he founded spacex to get done what government can't or won't.

It's going to take the rest of the industry a decade at least, to catch up and figure out how to compete.

If it went public today it would be worth at least $10 billion.

EDIT: you just can't suggest Musk is a crackpot or something, it's just not fair. I don't know the particulars on tesla, but the financials on spacex are out of sight. They've done everything RIGHT, they changed the whole industry, the man is not just another CEO billionaire parasite hedge fund guy in the hamptons, he's bigger than that, he's got vision, he wants to do bold things for all humanity.

If he gets America to Mars, when our government could not or would not, then Elon Musk will be in the history books forever. Nobody will remember anything about this time we live in now, but they will remember the first man on mars, and the story behind it.
Last edited by Sixstrings on Sat 22 Nov 2014, 00:58:14, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Sixstrings » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 01:13:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') have no idea what the big idea is, Six? His 'rocket' might as well be a Fed Ex truck for all the sophistication it implies. Sending one-ton loads up to near-earth orbit hasn't been a big deal since 1980. I paid for the development years ago. Must simply conned his way out of the public domain.


Pstarr, look at this. Even his COMPETITORS respect him, Musk came out of nowhere with nothing and learned the rocket business from scratch. Look at this, even Boeing says Elon Musk drives them to be better and improve what they've been doing:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')oeing chief engineer says SpaceX ‘drives us to be better’

With SpaceX in the picture, it’s actually pretty cool,” Goetz said. “They drive us to be better. It helps us sharpen our skills, and re-examine some of the things with how we’re doing business. It’s made a difference, for sure.”

Both Boeing and SpaceX will send U.S. astronauts to the ISS starting in 2017. NASA made its decision in September, awarding the bulk of the contract to Boeing ($4.6 billion), and the rest to Space X.
http://www.geekwire.com/2014/boeing-chief-engineer-says-spacex-drives-us-better/


Boeing-Lockheed has a problem actually, that's the real truth -- they're going to have to figure out how they can compete with spacex on cost. I read something about ULA looking to use subcontractors or something. As it is, how they've always done things, they are bloated and cannot compete with SpaceX.

I'm actually not a ULA-hater though. At least they are capable of doing a massive project and you know it'll get done, it's just that it may cost the taxpayer $100 billion or half a trillion and Congress won't fund that. If we wanted to do big stuff, as a nation with our taxpayer money, then ULA could do it -- but the business reality is that the federal gov won't fund it.

Unless it's war robots for the Pentagon, which google is doing, so they'll make bank on that.

What's special about SpaceX? You say it's the same old stuff?

What is special pstarr is that Musk and his company just brought fresh eyes to this business. They did everything differently. They had an eye on not just federal gov contracts, but the whole world.

You have to respect them for making a good rocket engine, the merlin. They've got another engine in the works, and another that is the holy grail -- rocket reusability. That could lower a launch cost from $60 million to like $6 million. That's a game changer, for business and governments worldwide, for access to space and development of space.

What do you mean about low payload? I'd have to go look the numbers up, exact tons to orbit, but Falcon 9 is pretty good and Falcon Heavy will lift the most tonnage to orbit in the world, and the most since the Saturn V.

There's been a lot of journalism on the spacex story out there, but here's a good article I saw lately:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hat it took for Elon Musk’s SpaceX to disrupt Boeing, leapfrog NASA, and become a serious space company
http://qz.com/281619/what-it-took-for-elon-musks-spacex-to-disrupt-boeing-leapfrog-nasa-and-become-a-serious-space-company/


You're right Pstarr that rocket engines are nothing new.

What's revolutionary is that his company has made a superior quality rocket that costs so little, and that Musk had the VISION and GUTS and maverickness to gleefully charge so little in an industry that otherwise "charges what they think they can get out of the customer."

I have liked Musk ever since I saw him in an interview talking about that, how the rest of the industry will just milk everyone and charge the most they can -- his vision is different, his vision is growing the market. And that grows space exploration, too.

I just think it's cool, someone that does things so radically different from the rest of the herd.
Last edited by Sixstrings on Sat 22 Nov 2014, 01:18:56, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Elon Musk: Killer Robots will eliminate us all in 5-10 Y

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Sat 22 Nov 2014, 01:14:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'W')hat's with the Elon Musk hate.

He makes good cars. I've seen documentaries about it, the guy has designers and engineers but he goes in at every step of the way personally micro manages every last detail of design.

Yeah, he makes cool cars for very rich people.

He also says really stupid stuff at times. Why should he be immune to being called out for saying really stupid things -- because he makes electric cars? Give me a break.

At least Ray Kurzweil, who is an actual artificial intelligence expert, when making wildly inaccurate (overoptimistic) assumptions about the future of A/I in the early 80's, gave his predictions about 30 years to unfold.

He continues to be wrong and to be overoptimistic, but at least he isn't just random.

What I want to know is: why is Elon Musk given a free pass to say any stupid thing just because he's successful in one area?

Edit: To clarify, the thing that is REALLY dumb to me is the absurdly short time-frame. If he'd said, say, 200 years, I'd call it speculative instead of stupid.
Last edited by Outcast_Searcher on Sat 22 Nov 2014, 01:45:55, edited 1 time in total.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron