Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 02:43:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daphne64', 'M')y big question with evolution is the jump from homo erectus to Homo sapiens.


Don't forget there were several species of humans that co-existed with homo sapiens. Homo sapiens either drove them to extinction or in the case of neanderthal, may have inter-bred.

Neanderthal was certainly no chimp.. fully intelligent and physically much stronger and more survivable, just didn't have as extensive language as homo sapiens. Language is the key to homo sapiens success. Now if you're suggesting "god" engineered homo sapien from homo erectus, then how do you explain neanderthal and that dwarf human species in Indonesia. I guess you could say God engineered those too, but where is the evidence for that. I hate to get into religion too much, but frankly there's no scientific evidence of God in the first place much less that he or she engineered one species from another.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]If most random mutations are deleterious, how in world could we make that big a jump without some kind of "engineering" hand?


Most mutations are neutral. I forget the number, but each one of us has a certain percentage of mutated genes. It usually doesn't make any difference, but sometimes it does.. could manifest as a bizarre genetic disorder, or survival advantage. In evolutionary process, "deleterious" mutations are weeded out because those individuals don't survive to mate. Beneficial mutations get passed on.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')lso, why have we not seen any changes in humans over the last 4000 years..


Here's your proof:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Evidence of Contemporary Modern Human Evolution Contained Within the Human Genome

The three prime examples of current evolution discussed are: certain populations' resistance to malaria, lactase persistence and resistance to HIV, each of which are adaptations regulated by mutant alleles. Each adaptation was broken down by the different mutations responsible for that adaptation. In order to determine if these mutations are, in fact, evidence of modern evolution, they were each subjected to a strict list of criteria necessary to be deemed adaptive and evolutionary.

In all cases except one, the mutations passed the criteria and are considered proof that modern humans are still evolving.
http://www.lurj.org/article.php/vol4n1/genome.xml



$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '(')other that what can be explained by diet and such)


How do you mean, "explained by diet and such." Diet doesn't mutate genes. It does however drive evolution.. in a milk drinking culture, individuals that evolve lactose tolerance survive more, and eventually the whole population is lactose tolerant. That's why European descendants are lactose tolerant and Asians generally are not. That's not "just diet," that's evolution at work.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 03:02:03

Evidence of evolution in your own body (vestigial organs):

Appendix
Paranasal Sinuses
Vomeronasal Organ
Coccyx (AKA: The Tail Bone)
Extrinsic Ear Muscles
Toes (only big toe is necessary.. pinky toe is evolving away)
Neck Rib
Darwin’s Point (a point some people have on their ear)
Third Eyelid (vestigial)
Palmaris Muscle
Subclavius Muscle
Male Nipples
Wisdom Teeth
Erector Pili (ie. Goosebumps)
Body Hair
Thirteenth Rib
Male Uterus
Female Vas Deferens
http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/07/09/what-evolution-left-behind-on-humans/

It's just common sense.. look at the tail bone.. that's clearly a vestigial tail:
Image
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 03:08:49

And on down the rabbit warren we all go.
Anti religionists are in their comfort zone debating evolution, I don't debate evolution.
They are not so comfortable debating the chicken/egg conundrum. A classic example of the frailty of human thought.
We think we are supreme, the world revolves around us, but we don't know where life came from.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby AdTheNad » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 06:12:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', '
')They are not so comfortable debating the chicken/egg conundrum. A classic example of the frailty of human thought.

I think you'll find that's a classic example of how seemingly frail human thought can easily be beaten with a bit more thought and science.

The egg obviously came first. Chickens evolved over millions of years, however whatever came before chickens would have been from an egg. At some point, the animal we consider a chicken today came from something that could not have been called a chicken due to numerous mutations, both came from an egg however, ergo egg before chicken.
AdTheNad
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed 22 Dec 2010, 07:47:48
Top

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 06:23:24

GODALMIGHTY Where did the 1st flagellating amoeba come from?
You clearly do not comprehend the depth of the conundrum.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby sparky » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 08:41:09

.
the flagellates were already quite sophisticated ,
I suppose your point is
what made a soup of chemical into a self replicating device
give that to God , the rest is sheer mechanics

as for an all knowing , all powerful , all compassionate being ....?
that's a bit like squaring the circle , I can conceive of any two of the above
either
not omnipotent ..........can't do nothing , caught in it's own laws
not omniscient ...........can't see us little moldy things on a speck of dust
not compassionate.......enjoy seeing us squirm

the 13th century heretics called Cathars believed the world was ruled by the Devil
at least it made some kind of sense
for educational purpose , the northern French unleashed a crusade against them
famous words at the taking of the town of Beziers, from a knight
"how do we know which ones are heretics and which ones are good Christians ?"
the papal legate answers " kill them all , let God sort them out "

after a long bit of killing and raping , they tortured the rest and burned them at the stake
to better teach them the goodness of God .
User avatar
sparky
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3587
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Sydney , OZ

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby Pretorian » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 09:17:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daphne64', '
')The population levels might have been about one million. So we went from homo erectus to homo sapiens with 4 billion individuals?

Human beings have about 3 billion base pairs of DNA. Supposedly we have 97% of them in common with chimps, so that's about 90 million base pairs difference. Lets say homo erectus shared about 99% of DNA in common with modern man, so that's still about 30 million base pairs difference.

If most random mutations are deleterious, how in world could we make that big a jump without some kind of "engineering" hand?



Well first you got a bit of a wrong data, it's 99% for them chimps. For Neandertals, that is considered to be another specie, it's 99.9%, that is exactly as much of a difference as between current races , but we obviously can't call those " species" as it would be politically incorrect.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby vision-master » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 09:51:00

The ancient Greeks warning!

Posted here once before.....

Image
O Egypt, Egypt, of thy religion nothing will remain but an empty tale, which thine own children in time to come will not believe; nothing will be left but graven words, and only the stones will tell of thy piety. And in that day men will be weary of life, and they will cease to think the universe worthy of reverent wonder and of worship. And so religion, the greatest of all blessings, for there is nothing, nor has been, nor ever shall be, that can be deemed a greater boon, will be threatened with destruction; men will think it a burden, and will come to scorn it. They will no longer love this world around us, this incomparable work of God, this glorious structure which he has built, this sum of good made up of things of many diverse forms, this instrument whereby the will of God operates in that which be has made, ungrudgingly favouring man’s welfare, this combination and accumulation of all the manifold things that can call forth the veneration, praise, and love of the beholder.

Darkness will be preferred to light, and death will be thought more profitable than life; no one will raise his eyes to heaven ; the pious will be deemed insane, and the impious wise; the madman will be thought a brave man, and the wicked will be esteemed as good. As to the soul, and the belief that it is immortal by nature, or may hope to attain to immortality, as I have taught you, all this they will mock at, and will even persuade themselves that it is false. No word of reverence or piety, no utterance worthy of heaven and of the gods of heaven, will be heard or believed.

And so the gods will depart from mankind, a grievous thing!, and only evil angels will remain, who will mingle with men, and drive the poor wretches by main force into all manner of reckless crime, into wars, and robberies, and frauds, and all things hostile to the nature of the soul. Then will the earth no longer stand unshaken, and the sea will bear no ships; heaven will not support the stars in their orbits, nor will the stars pursue their constant course in heaven; all voices of the gods will of necessity be silenced and dumb; the fruits of the earth will rot; the soil will turn barren, and the very air will sicken in sullen stagnation. After this manner will old age come upon the world. Religion will be no more; all things will be disordered and awry; all good will disappear.

But when all this has befallen, Asclepius, then the Master and Father, God, the first before all, the maker of that god who first came into being, will look on that which has come to pass, and will stay the disorder by the counterworking of his will, which is the good. He will call back to the right path those who have gone astray; he will cleanse the world from evil, now washing it away with water-floods, now burning it out with fiercest fire, or again expelling it by war and pestilence. And thus he will bring back his world to its former aspect, so that the Kosmos will once more be deemed worthy of worship and wondering reverence, and God, the maker and restorer of the mighty fabric, will be adored by the men of that day with unceasing hymns of praise and blessing.

Such is the new birth of the Kosmos; it is a making again of all things good, a holy and awe-striking restoration of all nature; and it is wrought in the process of time by the eternal will of God. For Gods will has no beginning; it is ever the same, and as it now is, even so it has ever been, without beginning. For it is the very being of God to purpose good.

vision-master
 

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby Daphne64 » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 12:14:57

Remember, I am coming at this from an agnostic point of view.

I was hoping someone could come with a study or realistic theory of how so many base pairs could change in such a relatively small number of individual-generations.

Even if you reduce the number of base pairs needing to be changed by a factor of ten, or multiply estimates of population by ten, I still don't think we are anywhere near the number of individuals needed to make the historical amount of change sound plausible.

It's not like you can change a single base pair and have a different protein be activated that somehow increases the size of the brain without any bad side effects - I think the changes have to made to quite a few base pairs in tandem. Think about someone looking at a computer and saying, "I wonder if we solder a connection between (picks two spots at random) these two points?" That would be the equivalent of several coordinated base pair substitutions. A single base pair substitution would be more like hitting a motherboard with a hammer.

How often do you think the computer would get BETTER as a result of either procedure? I am guessing way less than one in a million times.

The kind of changes that make a computer better - shrinking the die and putting just as many connections on it, increasing the speed of the signals, increasing the density of the hard drive, putting multiple cores on a processor - those are the equivalent of THOUSANDS of coordinated base pair changes - if not millions.

And yet, by my estimates, we only had about 4 billion individuals to work with for ALL the changes between modern man and it's immediately prior ancestor. (I tried to look it up, but couldn't find a definitive answer - I think it's Homo Erectus though).

I realize that if you have God (which could include a massively more advanced creature subject to our own physical laws or someone outside those laws) you have the question of how an even more advanced being came into being, but still... as a person with a masters in math and one course in college genetics, the idea of random point mutations just doesn't work, and I don't think we have any other ideas presently.

It becomes more striking when you compare with the speed of some other big changes in life. It took several hundred million years for ANYTHING to evolve beyond blue-green algae (which is actually bacteria). It also took some ridiculous amount of time (I think over 100 million years) before any creatures developed jaws strong enough to handle land plants and turned into full time land creatures. Think about how many organisms participated in THOSE changes.

You know, the theory of evolution might just get better if you atheists put away your blind belief that evolution is proven because we are here, and start asking more questions.
Last edited by Daphne64 on Wed 20 Jul 2011, 12:34:03, edited 1 time in total.
Daphne64
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: middle of the USA

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 12:19:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'R')eal science is about looking at things with a completely open mind. The questions on the mind of scientists at the quantum point, are the same questions, whether or not the scientist believes in a supernatural element. Real religion is open to science, not afraid of it for fear of loss of supernaturality, but interested because it endlessly reveals the depth and beauty of the creation.
Real science is about making falsifiable predictions that can be tested by experiment or observation.

The response of Creation "Science" or ID "Theory" to any scientific result is to recite the mantra: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')size=150]That doesn't prove anything.[/size]

They would be correct if they said:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')size=150]That doesn't DISprove any of our predictions.[/size]
because they don't make any predictions. :lol:
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby Daphne64 » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 12:43:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sixstrings', 'E')vidence of evolution in your own body (vestigial organs):

Appendix
Paranasal Sinuses
Vomeronasal Organ
Coccyx (AKA: The Tail Bone)
Extrinsic Ear Muscles
Toes (only big toe is necessary.. pinky toe is evolving away)
Neck Rib
Darwin’s Point (a point some people have on their ear)
Third Eyelid (vestigial)
Palmaris Muscle
Subclavius Muscle
Male Nipples
Wisdom Teeth
Erector Pili (ie. Goosebumps)
Body Hair
Thirteenth Rib
Male Uterus
Female Vas Deferens
http://www.decimation.com/markw/2007/07/09/what-evolution-left-behind-on-humans/

It's just common sense.. look at the tail bone.. that's clearly a vestigial tail:
Image


Why haven't women developed bigger hips to pop out kids easier? That would be a relatively simple change, with BIG evolutionary advantages ( 1 out of 5 women died in childbirth around 1700 and presumably before).

I don't want to sound too adversarial, but that list is bunch of stuff that doesn't make much difference one way or another. I don't know of any changes that are actually helpful and on any sort of the order of changes that mark the difference between modern man and prior hominids.
Daphne64
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: middle of the USA
Top

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby vision-master » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 13:44:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')eal science is about making falsifiable predictions that can be tested by experiment or observation.


'Real' science of today, only deals with physical matter that we can comprehend with our five senses. There are 360 senses in total. :)
vision-master
 
Top

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby vision-master » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 13:49:02

Image

DNA = LSD lsol.......

H >> I
A >> B
L >> M
Image

:)
vision-master
 

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 15:47:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daphne64', 'W')hy haven't women developed bigger hips to pop out kids easier? That would be a relatively simple change, with BIG evolutionary advantages ( 1 out of 5 women died in childbirth around 1700 and presumably before).


I saw this explained once but forget the details.. has something to do with when we evolved to walking upright. The way certain bones shifted. You're right that it appears to not be optimal.. but on the other hand, here we are with 6.6 billion people on the planet. So it must have been good enough.. that's how evolution works, a moderate disadvantage isn't necessarily weeded out. Although the fact that narrow hips have survived this long suggests there's some advantage here despite the more difficult childbirth. Probably has to do with running ability, etc.

Now if half of all children died in childbirth then evolutionary pressure for change would ramp up. Evolution is going on right now.. because of DNA / humane genome studies this is all fact now there's no debate anymore. There are African populations that have evolved 23 new genes for malaria resistance. That's evolution at work.

If you look at the fossil record going back 35,000 years, it's very clear that we're evolving smaller teeth and skulls and smaller stature overall. Australian aboriginals have the largest teeth of any racial group, they also have the thickest skulls.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') don't want to sound too adversarial, but that list is bunch of stuff that doesn't make much difference one way or another. I don't know of any changes that are actually helpful and on any sort of the order of changes that mark the difference between modern man and prior hominids.


There's more information in the link, with explanations.. this list is of vestigial evidence of past and ongoing evolution in our bodies.

For example goosebumps.. no reason to have that that without THICK full body hair. Other mammals use that to puff up their hair and intimidate predators. We've lost the thick body hair but still have the goosebumps.. it's evolution in progress, eventually we'll lose the goosebumps too.

I can't win a debate with a creationist though because they would always answer "because God made it that way."

At at the end of the day though.. you can deny Darwin, but you can't deny DNA and genetic science.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: THE Neanderthal Thread (merged)

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Wed 20 Jul 2011, 17:36:47

The ID had a great backbone design for critters whose weight was buoyantly suspended and who propelled themselves by waving their tail fins from side to side. It's a dumb design for critters that walk upright on land. But I suppose s/he has reasons that shall forever remain mysteries to us mere mortals.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: Global Warming and the "Crisis of Credibility"

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Thu 23 Oct 2014, 01:01:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Deputy Barnes', ' ')A sure and steady decrease in the percentage of Neanderthal blood, as evidenced by Otzi the Iceman's genome, is surely to blame.

Stress is the trigger of adaptation. If and when the climate goes haywire the retards will die off, but the strong will form small, isolated, inbred groups and survive.
A bit of a contradiction here.

Didn't they have enough stress in Otzi's time? Why would there be "decrease in the percentage of Neanderthal blood"? And where did this other "blood" come from if the "out of Africa" theory is bogus?

And, BTW, you Neanderthals are also "out of Africa" (unless you have another theory for that - please Enlighten us).
Last edited by Keith_McClary on Thu 23 Oct 2014, 01:10:53, edited 1 time in total.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Global Warming and the "Crisis of Credibility"

Unread postby Deputy Barnes » Thu 23 Oct 2014, 01:18:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Deputy Barnes', ' ')A sure and steady decrease in the percentage of Neanderthal blood, as evidenced by Otzi the Iceman's genome, is surely to blame.

Stress is the trigger of adaptation. If and when the climate goes haywire the retards will die off, but the strong will form small, isolated, inbred groups and survive.
A bit of a contradiction here.

Didn't they have enough stress in Otzi's time? Why would there be "decrease in the percentage of Neanderthal blood"? And where did this other "blood" come from if the "out of Africa" theory is bogus?

And, BTW, the Neanderthals are also "out of Africa" (unless you have another theory for that - please Enlighten us).


There was less stress in otzis time (bronze age) than the middle and upper Paleolithic. There was also poorer nutrition, thus metabolically costly Neanderthal genes had to be turned off.

Otzi the Iceman had 5.5% Neanderthal DNA, the equivalent contribution of having a Neanderthal grandfather. Most Europeans have only 3%, the contribution of a greag great greaf grandparent. Yet neither Otzi nor Ibon could have had a Neanderthal relative, as the latest known Neanderthal remains yet fouund are dated to 23,000 years ago, long before they existed.

Thus, Neanderthal DNA in modern Eurasians is not the lingering legacy of interbreeding between two different species but a persistent founding origin from which they descended. Neanderthals are our Forefathers. East Asians have retained more of it, and rightly theh tend to have more Neanderthal traits, such as large brain size, higher intelligence, and a higher capacity for success.

The "other blood" you refer to is ambiguous DNA shared amongst primates. Remember we are genetically 99% identical to neanderthals and approximately 97% identical to chimpanzees. It's that small fraction of Neanderthal paternal DNA that makes us so dissimilar to a chimp, and so much like a (severely degenerate) Neanderthal.

We now know that many of the genes we previously thought to be the result of modern human adaptation were actually evolved by NEANDERTHALS. Tibetan people are able to survive at high altitudes because of a gene developed in the middle Paleolithic by Neanderthals, and their apparent offshoots, the Denisovans. A gene for European intellgence involving fat metabolization in the brain was identified this year. The tanning genes which make our light skin so adaptable to so many different climates came from West Asian Neanderthals living modern day Kurdistan. And our hair too is mostly Neanderthal.

Everything that makes us who we are is Neanderthal. We are forever indebted to them for everything that we have. There has been no positive evolution going on since the end of the last ice age, just constant genetic damage from disasterous behaviors leading to the existence of people like Ibon. Humanity today is truly an inferior piece of shit just piggybacking off of the accomplishments of the more worthy forbearers.

The oldest remains with Neanderthal attributes are found in Greece at Petralona, and are 700,000 years old with no African affinities whatsoever. Neanderthals evolved out of Eurasian protohumans like homo georgicus, older than any African subhuman. They later evolved or mutated in to Upper Paleolithic man, and there is evidence of this continuity throughout the fossil record. Upper Paleolithic man, if not entirely Neanderthal, genetically speaking, surely was 75% Neanderthal, at the very least. Out of Africa is a religion just like global warming, only someone who doesn't investigate carefully would believe in it. Those and people who just lie to themselves and others, consciously or not.
"The most common lie is the lie that one tells to oneself" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Vote Republican.
User avatar
Deputy Barnes
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue 14 Oct 2014, 08:56:12
Top

Re: Global Warming and the "Crisis of Credibility"

Unread postby Ibon » Thu 23 Oct 2014, 08:45:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Deputy Barnes', '
')Everything that makes us who we are is Neanderthal. We are forever indebted to them for everything that we have. There has been no positive evolution going on since the end of the last ice age, just constant genetic damage from disasterous behaviors leading to the existence of people like Ibon. Humanity today is truly an inferior piece of shit just piggybacking off of the accomplishments of the more worthy forbearers. .


What would your noble neanderthal ancestors think if they saw you hunched over your digital device letting your synapses fire as your little fingers rapidly type a staccato rhythm on the keyboard, adrenaline pumping as you attempt this petty intellectual sword fight?

Come on deputy, show some love.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama
Top

Re: Global Warming and the "Crisis of Credibility"

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Thu 23 Oct 2014, 12:01:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Deputy Barnes', 'T')he oldest remains with Neanderthal attributes are found in Greece at Petralona, and are 700,000 years old with no African affinities whatsoever. Neanderthals evolved out of Eurasian protohumans like homo georgicus, older than any African subhuman. They later evolved or mutated in to Upper Paleolithic man, and there is evidence of this continuity throughout the fossil record. Upper Paleolithic man, if not entirely Neanderthal, genetically speaking, surely was 75% Neanderthal, at the very least. Out of Africa is a religion just like global warming, only someone who doesn't investigate carefully would believe in it. Those and people who just lie to themselves and others, consciously or not.
Your "consensus view" is totally different from what I read about current research in the field. You are welcome to your beliefs, but I hope you don't expect to be taken seriously, unless you can back them up.

Do you have beliefs about cosmology, quantum theory and relativity?
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron