by FoxV » Tue 27 May 2014, 10:30:02
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', 'A')n older worn out old car probably puts out more pollution then ten new ones so getting rid of them certainly will do no harm and they might achieve a solid plus in air quality. Imagine what the US would be like if we were still running cars on leaded gas.
Well sure getting rid of the old ones is probably a good idea. Although in communist china I doubt that the scrapping will be done fairly or evenly. I'm sure commercial fleet owners will be able to "pay a small fee" to someone to be exempted from the rules. ie this will probably focus on poor people in old beaters that don't do a lot of driving anyways.
but as PJ says, it's all just a drop in the bucket and will only have some slowing effect on the pollution growth. If any effect at all. just how much of that pollution savings from scrapping old cars will be taken up by brand new hummers and over sized SUVs anyways?
I'm sure Jevon is looking down laughing his ass off as we speak.

P.S.: We did this in Ontario. Trucks and SUVs were given easier standards because they would never pass the standards for everyone else. The result has been a boon for parts manufactures, dealers, and garages.
And Pollution? well nobody really knows because the changes occurred in tandem with the gutting of our manufacture base. So nobody can tell how much of our pollution improvements (which is only a small issue in one area, Toronto, out of a province half the size of europe) have been from the "drive clean" program or from our overall de-industrializing.
