Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Luddites vs Technologists

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 24 Oct 2013, 19:31:35

I call BS on 'foamed glass heat shield capable of rail gun speeds protecting a solid temperature restricted vessel' KJ calls 'Liar' on Google.
If we all knew how to read books, we would know what KJ knows lol.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Thu 24 Oct 2013, 19:33:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'T')here is no such thing as glass which will NOT LIQUEFY before reaching 2300 degrees C. Foamed or otherwise. The stuff would be peeling off like talcum at rail gun speeds. Then there is that danged plasma drive.


Yet this is the later design of heat shielding used on the leading edges of the wings of the Shuttle Orbiters. The individual layers heat up and shed incandescent particles which carry away the heat. This is a return from the lightweight ceramic fired tiles to the so-called "ablative" shielding of Mercury/Gemini/Apollo. The tiles on these leading edges were having to be removed for inspection after every mission anyway - the sheet goods use a lot less labor.

I know little about the foaming that produces the sheet goods, other than it involves a partial vacuum and precise doping of the glass with whatever foams up in the manufacturing process.

And yet again I am struck by how strange the world is. I am quoting from my hardcopy archives of IEEE proceedings, and you guys are doubting because you cannot find the same material on the Internet? (I only keep those issues which interest me, and discard even those when the electronic version can be accessed online.)

Again, I have to point out that there is a REAL WORLD that differs from the VIRTUAL WORLD you are immersed in. You should be living in the real world.
Last edited by KaiserJeep on Thu 24 Oct 2013, 19:39:12, edited 1 time in total.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Thu 24 Oct 2013, 19:38:39

So a 30 km rail gun fires an object into space and it's insulation requirement will be comparable to the Space Shuttle? And you claim to be an engineer? Computer engineer isn't it? Not a lot to do with thermodynamics- my forte is the original thermodynamic precision science- ceramics and glass.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Subjectivist » Thu 24 Oct 2013, 21:40:58

Actually for simple cargo like freeze dried food or specialty chemicals like rocket refueling supplies orbital guns have been proposed many times. After all you only need to get what, 7000 meters per second of velocity to get into orbit and a properly designed cannon can do that. Strictly for cargo though, a human would be turned to jelly by the accelleration on firing.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby ralfy » Thu 24 Oct 2013, 23:53:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'T')his is a useless debate. I don't actually care whether it was pure iridium or iridium in stone. All of the heavy elements on the Earth's crust came from meteorites that struck after the core cooled and the crust formed.

All those elements are present in space. Metals, gases, water, hydrocarbons, and unlimited solar power.

We have all the knowledge, all the technology we need to explore space. We are in the development stage.

For an example of a space transportation system that requires nothing but electricity, I refer you to the Heinlein novel "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress". Electromagnet catapults are used to send capsules of food from the Lunar colony farms to Earth.

Those of you who still have doubts: I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. I think most of you have closed minds on this matter, and are pre-judging without even honestly examining the possibilities.

Our Solar System has all the raw materials, all the energy, and all the space that humans need to live. We know everything we need to know to build in space. In the end, the only thing stopping us is the opposition of closed minded people.

YOU get to decide whether your mind is closed or not. Let me point out that if you failed to examine the book I pointed you at, it is likely that you already decided long ago.

The thing is that perma-culture, agrarian farming methods, environmental consciousness, worshiping a living planet, etc. etc. is no form of an answer either. If we had thought the issues through and if the people of the entire Earth had understood what was at stake and what the path to human salvation was, then we could have saved this planet as late as 200 years ago.

I go to work every day, I log on and I do my best to keep our entire world working. I care for the computers that enable Internet commerce, credit cards, stock exchanges, and all forms of virtual electronic money. That is just my personal role, there are millions of people like me, striving constantly to keep the world in business. Collectively we make it possible for 7.3B humans to live and eat and reproduce. In the last 200 years, we have all of us working together been enormously successful.

The wife and I were remarking on the air pollution here in Silicon Valley this morning. It subsequently proved to be that there was a large grass fire South of the valley and the smoke was blowing North. Then a caller on the radio mentioned that if Climate Change were not occurring, this would not be happening - it is not often that fire season here persists into late October, but there has been only trace amounts of rain so far this year.

Then of course, that person blamed "Big Oil". Naturally. He was in his car, burning fuel and spewing partially burned hydrocarbons into the air, and it was someone else's fault. He was also breaking the law and endangering those around him by talking on what was almost certainly a "hands free" cell phone - still illegal, but very unlikely that you will be caught, especially if you keep the little earpiece in your right ear where nobody can see it. But he gave only a first name and he got away with it.

For just a moment, let me speak on behalf of those of us who are still working to keep things going.

Stop telling us we cannot possibly succeed. If you have a better plan, one that allows all the various peoples of the Earth to prosper, then let us hear it.

DON'T give me this crap about organic vegetables and the benefits of manure. Your farming methods if adopted today could feed a quarter of the people already in the US, but only if we ended food exports that keep others alive. Don't give me twaddle about Solar Power, when I frequently work until after dark, then have to grocery shop, cook, and do laundry after dark.

If you have actual beneficial ideas that would help the rest of us, then let's hear them. If you just want to tell other people that what they are proposing can never work, then why don't you go and take a long walk off a short pier, with pockets full of rocks.


As you pointed out in your previous message, plans for space exploration will not proceed because people will be too busy fighting with each other, and the situation will lead even to die offs and cannibalism. One can only hope that space exploration will take among the few million left.

Given that, I don't understand how space exploration is an "actual" idea.
User avatar
ralfy
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sat 28 Mar 2009, 11:36:38
Location: The Wasteland

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 01:37:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'A')gain, I have to point out that there is a REAL WORLD that differs from the VIRTUAL WORLD you are immersed in. You should be living in the real world.
In the REAL WORLD companies or governments or somebody has to have a reason to pour $trillions into your Golden Age of Science Fiction schemes (I probably still have those stories in my basement). In the REAL SOLAR SYSTEM there are not pure gold or iridium asteroids. Granted, there is lots of nickel out there - I can't think of anything else useful to Earthlings, unless you have ideas for extracting the 1 ppm precious metals from the rocks.

Yes, I know it would be fantastic (literally) if the descendants of a few thousand astro-miners grew and prospered to populate the Solar System and then (somehow) the galaxy, like in those SF stories, but who is going to pay for this fantasy?
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 02:08:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'A')lso the term 'conspiracy theorist' is nothing but double talk hogwash.
No, it's "double standard" hogwash. A "conspiracy theorist" is someone who doesn't accept the offical conspiracy theory. :roll:
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 09:13:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Keith_McClary', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'A')lso the term 'conspiracy theorist' is nothing but double talk hogwash.
No, it's "double standard" hogwash. A "conspiracy theorist" is someone who doesn't accept the offical conspiracy theory. :roll:



what condition my condition was in........... :lol:
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby SeaGypsy » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 09:27:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeaGypsy', 'T')here is no such thing as glass which will NOT LIQUEFY before reaching 2300 degrees C. Foamed or otherwise. The stuff would be peeling off like talcum at rail gun speeds. Then there is that danged plasma drive.


Yet this is the later design of heat shielding used on the leading edges of the wings of the Shuttle Orbiters. The individual layers heat up and shed incandescent particles which carry away the heat. This is a return from the lightweight ceramic fired tiles to the so-called "ablative" shielding of Mercury/Gemini/Apollo. The tiles on these leading edges were having to be removed for inspection after every mission anyway - the sheet goods use a lot less labor.

I know little about the foaming that produces the sheet goods, other than it involves a partial vacuum and precise doping of the glass with whatever foams up in the manufacturing process.

And yet again I am struck by how strange the world is. I am quoting from my hardcopy archives of IEEE proceedings, and you guys are doubting because you cannot find the same material on the Internet? (I only keep those issues which interest me, and discard even those when the electronic version can be accessed online.)

Again, I have to point out that there is a REAL WORLD that differs from the VIRTUAL WORLD you are immersed in. You should be living in the real world.


So post the thing and have it verified, then we can talk about something someone else claims to know, other than you.
SeaGypsy
Master Prognosticator
Master Prognosticator
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Wed 04 Feb 2009, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 18:34:58

From you lips to Gods ears! It would be a relief.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby AgentR11 » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 22:50:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Subjectivist', 'A')ctually for simple cargo like freeze dried food or specialty chemicals like rocket refueling supplies orbital guns have been proposed many times. After all you only need to get what, 7000 meters per second of velocity to get into orbit and a properly designed cannon can do that. Strictly for cargo though, a human would be turned to jelly by the accelleration on firing.


I'm pretty sure a muzzle velocity of 7km/s per second at sea level will not be sufficient to place a projectile in orbit. That said, what is the largest projectile to survive a 10 km flight ending at 7km/s at STP? I'm thinking its never been done... I can't find any reference to it ever having been done...
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 23:32:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'I') can't find any reference to it ever having been done...
There was Project HARP:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/atlas_obscur ... doned.html
only 3.6 km/s according to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_gun
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_HARP
Last edited by Keith_McClary on Fri 25 Oct 2013, 23:38:59, edited 2 times in total.
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby AgentR11 » Fri 25 Oct 2013, 23:37:14

That was what I was reading as well. No where near the velocities required for LEO...
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby Tanada » Sat 26 Oct 2013, 07:18:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR11', 'T')hat was what I was reading as well. No where near the velocities required for LEO...


The way I remember it the gun puts the object up as high and as fast as possible, then the solid rocket booster in the projectile puts it into orbit when it is at the top of its ballistic trajectory. I recall seeing lots of computer simulations back in the 1980's or early 1990's showing how it would work. The useful payload was only something like 2 kg in orbit (they talked about using it for GPS civilian network) but the reload and re-fire time was so quick and cheap that to supply something like ISSA would have been easy compared to the way we do it in this world. Ideally the gun would fire at a 45 to 55 degree elevation giving the greatest possible range altitude after air drag was subtracted out of the velocity. It was one of the things studied under the whole CATS concept I was involved in way back then.

Found it! $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')anadian gun-launched orbital launch vehicle. The Martlet 2G-1 was the absolute minimum gun-launched satellite vehicle. Conceived when the HARP project was under threat, it was a seven-inch diameter, two-stage solid propellnat vehicle that would be sabot-launched from the HARP 16 inch gun. Its total payload in orbit would have been just two kilogrammes - ideal for today's planned nano-satellites. Unfortunately even this minimum orbital launch vehicle could not be demonstrated before the program was shut down.

During the last year of the HARP program, when it became clear that further funding was not forthcoming, and that the goals of the Martlet 4 program were not to be realised, full efforts were diverted to developing a Martlet 2G-1 orbital vehicle (GLO-1A). It was felt that if a satellite - any satellite, no matter now small - could be successfully gun-launched, that it then would be possible to encourage further funding, either public or private, which would permit the orbital goals of the HARP program to be realised. Unfortunately time and fate were against HARP and the project was closed down on June 30 1967, only a few months before an orbital 2G-1 could be flown.

LEO Payload: 2.00 kg (4.40 lb) to a 185 km orbit at 13.00 degrees.

Stage Data - Martlet 2G-1

Stage 0. 1 x HARP Gun. Gross Mass: 450 kg (990 lb). Empty Mass: 1.00 kg (2.20 lb). Thrust (vac): 127,000.000 kN (28,550,000 lbf). Isp: 365 sec. Burn time: 0.0100 sec. Isp(sl): 43 sec. Diameter: 0.42 m (1.37 ft). Span: 0.42 m (1.37 ft). Length: 36.59 m (120.04 ft). Propellants: Guncotton. No Engines: 1. Engine: 16 in gun. Status: Out of production. The HARP gun, a converted 16 inch naval gun, was used during the 1960's to launch the Martlet series of rocket-launched space probes. Using 450 kg of M8M propellant, with optimum web size, and a maximum muzzle pressure of 4100 atmospheres, the gun had the following performance:


Further details http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/maret2g1.htm
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sat 26 Oct 2013, 12:42:05

But that's sorta my point, that there's always been these big and bold plans and designs, but when push comes to shove, the designs are not brought into reality. And maybe I can accept a bit of collusion or resistance within the US or Europe getting in the way of a new(rather old) launch tech; but neither the Chinese nor Russians would hesitate if they felt it could make the step to LEO.

And its not that I dislike railguns. I think a railgun mounted on a nuclear powered ship could prove all kinds of effective in a number of combat roles.

Maybe, as you note, the age of micro satellites will bring the railgun back into the picture, but.. I can't help but wonder about the economics, we must lift heavy stuff in a box to the ISS, that box will always have room for some number of micro satellites and ISS mountable experiments. Are there really enough desired micro satellite projects to make the economics of a railgun work in comparison with adding a kilo here and a kilo there to a cargo lift?

In the end, we've had the tech for at least 30yrs. And yet, as far as I can tell, no one has ever put a projectile into LEO with a railgun. I don't think that's just an accident.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Sat 26 Oct 2013, 14:00:20

You mean you don't think it's an accident that a 30 km long railgun with the muzzle located on top of a high mountain near the equator has been built? The estimates I have heard are around $6.5 Billion US$, about evenly divided between the railgun itself and the nuclear power plant. The estimate does not include any allowance to purchase the real estate or construct roads or railroads to the remote area.

I suppose if we wanted to, we could list LOTS of multi-billion dollar projects that have yet to be built.

I remember when the STS (i.e. the Shuttle) was sized as a $29B program. In the end it cost $209B, over 7X the initial estimate. It is unlikely that private investors would take such a risk, some government would have to make it a priority.

In comparison, Virgin Galactic will probably become operational with less than $1B in funding.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Sat 26 Oct 2013, 14:05:27

vision-master
 

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sat 26 Oct 2013, 14:23:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KaiserJeep', 'I') suppose if we wanted to, we could list LOTS of multi-billion dollar projects that have yet to be built.

I remember when the STS (i.e. the Shuttle) was sized as a $29B program. In the end it cost $209B, over 7X the initial estimate. It is unlikely that private investors would take such a risk, some government would have to make it a priority.


EXACTLY! If you say space, and project Y for $30bn, Government Bob thinks, lovely, another $300bn project that will provide launch services at an amortized rate ten times more costly than what we already have, at a time that we finally have private companies successfully taking on that role.

All the private sector interest is directed at variations on ejecting propellant mass out the back end of a vehicle. Because its working tech, and its cheaper than a railgun or any of these other grandiose fantasies. Just the steady state interest on $300bn is enough to launch dozens and dozens of rockets a year.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby vision-master » Sat 26 Oct 2013, 14:37:19

In the Sanskrit Samaraanganasutraadhaara it is written:

Strong and durable must the body of the Vimana be made, like a great flying bird of light material. Inside one must put the mercury engine with its iron heating apparatus underneath. By means of the power latent in the mercury which sets the driving whirlwind in motion, a man sitting inside may travel a great distance in the sky. The movements of the Vimana are such that it can vertically ascend, vertically descend, move slanting forwards and backwards. With the help of the machines human beings can fly in the air and heavenly beings can come down to earth.

http://veda.wikidot.com/ancient-sanskri ... -ufo-visit

"European scholarship regards human civilization as a recent progression starting yesterday with the Fiji islander, and ending today with Rockefeller, conceiving ancient culture as necessarily half savage culture." It is a superstition of modern thought that the march of knowledge has always been linear." "Our vision of "prehistory" is terribly inadequate. We have not yet rid our minds from the hold of a one-and-only God or one-and-only Book, and now a one-and-only Science."

http://www.hinduwisdom.info/Vimanas.htm
vision-master
 

Re: Luddites vs Technologists

Unread postby KaiserJeep » Sat 26 Oct 2013, 18:40:56

Well, note that the EM catapult is a way of accessing space that utilizes electricity. It does not require that one burn a ton or more of explosive fuel for each pound put into orbit, and it can be used over and over for decades. I don't think it is any less likely or possible than SSTO or further development of chemical fueled boosters. It is one scheme that can be used with very low operating costs, no need for exotic spacecraft construction (steel cans are all you need) and has low environmental impact since there is no exhaust.

Obviously it will have doubters until the first one is built.
KaiserJeep 2.0, Neural Subnode 0010 0000 0001 0110 - 1001 0011 0011, Tertiary Adjunct to Unimatrix 0000 0000 0001

Resistance is Futile, YOU will be Assimilated.

Warning: Messages timestamped before April 1, 2016, 06:00 PST were posted by the unmodified human KaiserJeep 1.0
KaiserJeep
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6094
Joined: Tue 06 Aug 2013, 17:16:32
Location: Wisconsin's Dreamland

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron