by Ibon » Fri 05 Apr 2013, 10:16:22
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'O')ne of the main points of the Eric Hoffer book is that the best leaders are the people that really don't want the job.
I finished the book. Thanks again for recommending it. The author, Eric Hoffer had no formal education and was a migrant field worker, worked in restaurants, as a gold prospector and then after WWII as a longshoreman for 25 years. Self-taught individuals have that freedom to free associate and wander where curiosity leads them. They become original thinkers unconstrained from academic obligations , free of the bias of any department or institute. We might see more individuals like him emerge in the near future as our learning institutions continue to lose creditability. Ironically, this is somehow related to the topic, since original thinkers, according to Hoffer, are one of the ingredients that form mass movements early on as they distill and conceptualize stuff cooking in that collective soup. They are unfortunately often hijacked by fanatics as Hoffer points out.
Reading the True Believer through the lens of human overshoot and how natural consequences can influence the emergence and nature of mass movements during the 21st century has been an interesting exercise. Some of Hoffer’s insights take on perhaps a new meaning since he wrote this book shortly after WWII and his main focus was on mass movements and their leaders mainly from religions, nationalism and communism. If a mass movement and leader though is catalyzed from a series of external ecological events (overshoot) rather than an emerging ideology, does that potentially change the nature of the movement and the leaders in any significant way that differ from the examples described in the book? That was the over-arching question that I held while reading through the chapters.
Here is just a semi coherent ramble of some of the lines and concepts of his book that jumped out at me.
Discontent is likely to be highest when misery is bearable…. Intensity of discontent seems to be in inverse proportion to the distance from the object fervently desired. The about to be rich, the new poor, those recently enslaved make up this group. Not like the very poor on the borderline of starvation who live purposeful lives because they are involved in survival. They do not get involved with mass movements. The disenfranchised become the cornerstones of a new world. Example the undesired disenfranchised that left Europe built a new world in North America. Change from the margins. Hoffer mentions that those who lead purposeful lives are not prone to mass movements. If you are in possession of creative powers… to see things grow and develop under our hand. Frustration rises when you are unemployed or employed in meaningless menial labor or are bored.
Direct quote There is perhaps no more reliable indicator of a society’s ripeness for a mass movement than the prevalence of unrelieved boredom. In almost all the descriptions of the periods preceding the rise of mass movements there is a reference to vast ennui.
Where people live autonomous lives and are not badly off, yet are without ability or opportunities for creative work or useful action, there is not telling to what desperate and fantastic shifts they might resort in order to give meaning and purpose to their lives. So what conclusions can we draw? As we go into descent with further chaos there will be ripe opportunities of mass movements lead by fanatics and false prophets who will exploit the desperation of the frustrated. Hitleresque personalities. I can certainly see that and in fact predict it will happen.
I see the collective today globally in a different place however than where the collective was say around WWII. There is not that provincial nationalism with a crisis of Lebensraum like in those days. I think the collective in the west will be skeptical about any bombastic charismatic fanatical leader. However I am not so sure about Asia once China would be denied their opportunity to taste being the global empire at 5 minutes to midnight because overshoot cut them down. I could imagine the population there could rally behind fanatics. Just like Americans could rally behind a fanatic as consequences move them off the pedestal of being the leading empire. This is all pure speculation however.
As you mentioned Preston, Hoffer offers the examples of the best leaders being the ones that really didn't wat the job. Lincoln and Ghandi as leaders who took that momentum of a mass movement and travelled with it to a selfless place of generosity instead of becoming a cult of power.
You know how hurricanes draw folks together. I wonder if enough natural consequences of overshoot would not possibly rally a mass movement and allow a compassionate leader or organization to emerge that like Lincoln or Ghandi would lead from humility or generosity to confront external environmental calamities. Will there be a hunger for such a leader be in the collective soup after the environmental destruction of our hubris is laid bare for all to see?
That is my question. Can a leader rise out of a collective that recognizes with an intuitive sense that domination and hubris this time round will not solve our underlying problems and that we would then rally behind a leadership that would come from humility and strength around environmental issues. It’s possible.
Again, that is the big question I was left pondering after reading the book.
Between now and then however I fear we will have to go through a number of mass movements lead by fanatics preying on the false hopes of the collective. A collective that will need to first apply their desperation in attempting to get back on the domination status quo. Each failed attempt though could allow the possibility of a Ghandi or Lincoln style leader to emerge though.
Or are we beyond following an individual man or woman? Would the individual represent just a figurehead of a new insitution. A new Church?
Hoffer mentions Christianity as the longest and most stable surviving mass movement since the followers felt like participants and benefiaries of the message. Could something like this happen again?
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com