by linlithgowoil » Wed 01 Jun 2005, 05:15:57
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ewsflash Linlithgow - social welfare doesn't create any more money or goods - So you really think if TSHTF your goverment is going to continue paying for you to sit in your apartment sucking the collective redistribution teat? Theres no difference between socialism (redistribution) and theft. PERIOD. Government takes from me, under threat of force, and reditributes to whoever they think need it more... ie THEFT. Or I guess you could call it extortion, whichever you like best...
btw the US has a HUGE social welfare system and is really not that much different from the UK in that sense, medicare, medicaid, low income housing, welfare, social security, etc....
C'mon is it really neccesary to make a broad flamebait statement like "the US has no social conscience, no sympathy for the poor etc"? - Jeez... And btw I have been to Scotland, have you even been here?
You think that taxing a rich person who has more money than he needs and giving it to poor people is theft? That just confirms to me the type of attitude that many americans have - 'i'm alright jack - too bad you have no cash, it must be because you are lazy, get your hands off my stash'.
yes - i've been to america - florida. Horrible place, lots of very fat people who could barely walk. Profligate consumption of unnecessary items. zero culture. Desolate landscape of lots of roads, no paths to walk on and endless malls with enormous car parks. Needless to say, i'm not in a hurry to go back.
maybe i phrased my post wrong though. i didnt mean america doesnt have a social conscience entirely - i just think the us has a totally different attitude. in the US, it appears to me that you are judged entirely upon your wealth. if you don't have 2 cars, a big house and all that crap, then you are worthless. and if you don't have these things, its because you didn't work hard enough or are stupid - therefore people who dont have these things shouldnt receive hand outs from the 'hard working' types who worked hard for their american dream.
i, and many others, dont see it this way at all. i can see that people who are born into rich families usually go on to become rich themselves, and those from poor families usually go on to become poor themselves - with exceptions of course. this tells me that, if you have wealth already, its very easy to protect, whereas if you dont, its hard to gain because those who have it dont want you to take it from them.
unfortunately, many americans actually believe they live in a meritocracy

, which is very amusing to me.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here were many charitable organizations devoted to helping the poor before the current massive (and I may add) wasteful bueracratic "solution"...
You sound a bit like Scrooge. 'The workhouse will take care of the poor, its none of my concern.'.
So, if you fell on hard times through no fault of your own, and you saw a guy driving by who inherited millions from his father but didnt work for it - would you think to yourself - 'this is fair, this is america!!!' and not want the government to help you out?
I cant believe you said socialism was theft though. You sound like one of those rabid anti-communist types who think anything other than unbridled capitalism is devil inspired. I suppose you believe in the 'trickle down' theory of wealth as well? Even though its shown that the rich get richer each year and the poor get poorer - how do you explain this?
A caring society should provide all its inhabitants with an income, no matter whether they work or not. The income should be enough to guarantee them a reasonable house in good repair, food, electricity, water, sewerage and public services etc. The main reason this should be done is that 100% employment is impossible, people get ill, people get old, things happen etc. etc. If you dont believe this then i take it you won't mind living on the streets and starving to death if/when your circumstances change for the worse.