Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby Pops » Sat 31 Dec 2011, 18:49:58

This will make you feel better:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '&')quot;I want to clarify that my administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens," Obama said in a statement Saturday. "Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a nation."

http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/31/politics/ ... ense-bill/


I really don't know how people can think safety no matter the cost is a good thing?

Is it because they really think innocent people never get accused? That they will never be accused because they aren't a terrorist so who gives a crap? That only the guilty are arrested? Is that why the dim bulbs that make it to jury duty always say "let's vote" before anyone even sits down?

This is scarier than just about anything I can name.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby IndigoMoon » Sat 31 Dec 2011, 19:04:29

I'm absolutely sick over this. And he waited until he was in Hawaii on NYE no less. Happy F'ing 2012 everyone. Welcome to the United Police States.
Live simply, love generously, care deeply, and speak kindly.
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass;
It's about learning how to dance in the rain.
User avatar
IndigoMoon
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun 25 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: NE Ohio

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sat 31 Dec 2011, 21:09:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'S')o, when do the round ups and exicutions begin?


No need to execute.
Just toss'em in a supermax cell and forget they have a name.
And despite what Obama is saying, with the way the law is, he can do it anyway, and never acknowledge that it was done.

Disappeared applying to the US, who would have thought.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby Newfie » Sat 31 Dec 2011, 22:39:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')his will make you feel better:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '&')quot;I want to clarify that my administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens," Obama said in a statement Saturday. "Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a nation."

http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/31/politics/ ... ense-bill/


I really don't know how people can think safety no matter the cost is a good thing?

Is it because they really think innocent people never get accused? That they will never be accused because they aren't a terrorist so who gives a crap? That only the guilty are arrested? Is that why the dim bulbs that make it to jury duty always say "let's vote" before anyone even sits down?

This is scarier than just about anything I can name.


"My administration" is not what I am worried about. It is the NEXT administration that has me a twitter. No matter if he wins again or not, once that language is law it is likely to stay there until someone 'needs' it.

I doubt that it holds much threat for geezers like Pops and myself, however I think it bodes poorly for our off spring.

And, just to be clear, I am really disappointed in Obama for caving on this issue. I suggest we start a petition to have him named Chamberlain of the year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby eXpat » Sat 31 Dec 2011, 23:04:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')his will make you feel better:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '&')quot;I want to clarify that my administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens," Obama said in a statement Saturday. "Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a nation."

http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/31/politics/ ... ense-bill/


I really don't know how people can think safety no matter the cost is a good thing?

Is it because they really think innocent people never get accused? That they will never be accused because they aren't a terrorist so who gives a crap? That only the guilty are arrested? Is that why the dim bulbs that make it to jury duty always say "let's vote" before anyone even sits down?

This is scarier than just about anything I can name.


"My administration" is not what I am worried about. It is the NEXT administration that has me a twitter. No matter if he wins again or not, once that language is law it is likely to stay there until someone 'needs' it.

I doubt that it holds much threat for geezers like Pops and myself, however I think it bodes poorly for our off spring.

And, just to be clear, I am really disappointed in Obama for caving on this issue. I suggest we start a petition to have him named Chamberlain of the year.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munich_Agreement

Who knows pal, You may have to be worried about this admistration as well!.
Happy New Year!
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw

You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” Ayn Rand
User avatar
eXpat
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3801
Joined: Thu 08 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby AgentR11 » Sat 31 Dec 2011, 23:08:21

Well, obviously, the lefties like Pops, et al, need not be terribly concerned. You don't disappear your supporters after all.

With this law in place, I'll feel much safer if Romney, Gingrich, or Paul wins! At least I'll be in the correct party then.
Yes we are, as we are,
And so shall we remain,
Until the end.
AgentR11
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6589
Joined: Tue 22 Mar 2011, 09:15:51
Location: East Texas

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby rangerone314 » Sat 31 Dec 2011, 23:26:55

If by some fracking miracle Ron Paul wins the GOP nomination, I will vote for him in 2012. This would be the first person I voted for since Perot in 1992.

I seriously think at this point we need to try and organize a Constitutional convention.
An ideology is by definition not a search for TRUTH-but a search for PROOF that its point of view is right

Equals barter and negotiate-people with power just take

You cant defend freedom by eliminating it-unknown

Our elected reps should wear sponsor patches on their suits so we know who they represent-like Nascar-Roy
User avatar
rangerone314
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4105
Joined: Wed 03 Dec 2008, 04:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby Pops » Sun 01 Jan 2012, 00:35:27

The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby eXpat » Sun 01 Jan 2012, 11:13:33

The Huffington Post doesn't mince words in this article:
Obama Signs Defense Bill Despite 'Serious Reservations'
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]WASHINGTON -- Indefinite military detention of Americans became the law of the land Saturday, as President Barack Obama signed a defense bill that codified that authority, even as he said he would not use it.

The National Defense Authorization Act states how the military is to be funded, but also includes a number of controversial provisions on arresting and holding suspected terrorists, which at first drove Obama to threaten a veto.

He retreated from that threat after Congress added provisions that took the ultimate authority to detain suspects from the military's hands and gave it to the president. Congress also clarified that civilian law enforcement agencies -- such as the FBI -- would still have authority to investigate terrorism and added a provision that asserts nothing in the detention measures changes current law regarding U.S. citizens.

Still, the signing on New Year's Eve as few people were paying attention angered civil liberties advocates, who argue that the law for the first time spells out certain measures that have not actually been tested all the way to the Supreme Court, including the possibility of detaining citizens in military custody without trial for as long as there is a war on terror.

"President Obama's action today is a blight on his legacy because he will forever be known as the president who signed indefinite detention without charge or trial into law,” said Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

"The statute is particularly dangerous because it has no temporal or geographic limitations, and can be used by this and future presidents to militarily detain people captured far from any battlefield," Romero added. "The ACLU will fight worldwide detention authority wherever we can, be it in court, in Congress or internationally.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/31/obama-defense-bill_n_1177836.html
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw

You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” Ayn Rand
User avatar
eXpat
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3801
Joined: Thu 08 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby Newfie » Sun 01 Jan 2012, 13:04:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eXpat', '
')Who knows pal, You may have to be worried about this admistration as well!.
Happy New Year!



Well, you might just be right.

Kinda sucks ya'know.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby roccman » Sun 01 Jan 2012, 13:24:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'B')etter take a look at this then go to the ACLU site and send a message:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he U.S. Senate is considering the unthinkable: changing detention laws to imprison people — including Americans living in the United States itself — indefinitely and without charge.

The Defense Authorization bill — a "must-pass" piece of legislation — is headed to the Senate floor with troubling provisions that would give the President — and all future presidents — the authority to indefinitely imprison people, without charge or trial, both abroad and inside the United States.

If enacted, sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA would:

1) Explicitly authorize the federal government to indefinitely imprison without charge or trial American citizens and others picked up inside and outside the United States;

(2) Mandate military detention of some civilians who would otherwise be outside of military control, including civilians picked up within the United States itself; and

(3) Transfer to the Department of Defense core prosecutorial, investigative, law enforcement, penal, and custodial authority and responsibility now held by the Department of Justice.

ACLU Email Your Senator Page

http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-secur ... fine-being

http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/co ... lice-state



it's always tin Pops...until it's not - obomba signed this into law last night.
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert
Top

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby eXpat » Sun 01 Jan 2012, 13:40:29

Well, I'll be damned , Hi Rocc, :) everybody is showing up for 2012!
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw

You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” Ayn Rand
User avatar
eXpat
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3801
Joined: Thu 08 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby Newfie » Sun 01 Jan 2012, 23:20:14

Somewhere earlier today I saw a really great quote and now I can't find it. I thought it was this thread but I guess no.

It was, IIRC, from a past US Supreme Court Chief Justice. To paraphrase broadly.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')There is a period between normalcy and tyranny when all seems well but the civil liberties have been eroded. We must keep a constant eye out to watch for this erosion and do all we can to stop it whenever it raises its head.


Corrections appreciated.

I thought it apropos of this discussion.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby Cog » Mon 02 Jan 2012, 00:51:02

Our Congress no longer cares what we think or if a law is even close to being constitutional. We live under fascism right now. The iron hammer of the state is wrapped in velvet for now but it won't be for long.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 02 Jan 2012, 02:42:21

OK so the law says this?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')
b) APPLICABILITY TO UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS.—
(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS.—The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.
(2) LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS.—The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to a lawful resident alien of the United States on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States.

I've heard that the law clarifies the Bush era court ruling regards Yaser Hamdi (captured by Northern Alliance forces in Afghanistan) and suspected al Qaeda member–and U.S. citizen–named Jose Padilla, taking him into custody at O’Hare Airport in Chicago. The courts said Hamdi could be tried by the military, and was leaning towards ordering Padilla tried in civilian court when the government sent him to civilian court anyway. Then this law would be consistent with where the courts pushed back against the excesses of the Bush administration.

Did I miss something?
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby Cloud9 » Mon 02 Jan 2012, 07:58:17

Preston when the ACLU and members of the Tea Party are on the same page, that would cause me to suspect their combined take on the law is probably correct. I know it must be heart breaking that a liberal, black constitutional scholar signed away your civil liberties, but that appears to be exactly what has happened. We now live in a police state.

"In his last official act of business in 2011, President Barack Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act from his vacation rental in Kailua, Hawaii. In a statement, the president said he did so with reservations about key provisions in the law — including a controversial component that would allow the military to indefinitely detain terror suspects, including American citizens arrested in the United States, without charge."

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/20 ... -citizens/
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 02 Jan 2012, 11:07:55

OK, I asked a question, you didn't respond.....
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby Cog » Mon 02 Jan 2012, 11:19:40

There is no requirement for the military to detain US citizens. However it is allowed.

Does that clarify the situation for you?
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 02 Jan 2012, 11:51:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cog', 'T')here is no requirement for the military to detain US citizens. However it is allowed.
Does that clarify the situation for you?

What is the point you are trying to make? I'm guessing you aren't demanding that it should require the military to detain US citizens, but I'm not sure that you want citizens captured on foreign battlefields released either. Take your time.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Indefinite Military Detention in Your Town

Unread postby Cog » Mon 02 Jan 2012, 12:24:33

Review the 4th Circuit court of Appeals Jose Padilla v Rumsfeld where it was held that Padilla, a US citizen could be detained indefintely by the US military. The fact he was later transferred to the civilian court system was not ordered by the Court but by political pressure brought on GWB.

What this latest NDAA does is codify that the USA is now designated as a battlefield and its entirely within the executive branches power to determine what is a terrorist and what is not on US soil. It mandates the military detention of any person with ties to a terrorist group or associated with one.

What you see as an exclusion for US citizens:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.


This does not forbid the detention of US citzens by the military for an indefinite period of time. The 4th Circuit has already ruled that the executive branch can already do that.

What is dangerous about the NDAA is the mandate for indefinite military detention on US soil of anyone with terrorists ties or even suspected military ties. US citizens could have easily been excluded from this requirement by this language:

US citizens shall not be subject to military detention.

The NDAA allows US citizens to be held without trial for an indefinite period of time if the executive branch decides its in the national interest to do so.

Legal language has meaning. Shall, require, and allow have very different meanings under the law. It was no mistake that Levin/McCain wrote the language the way they did.

I have no problem with non-US citizens being seized and held by the military indefintely either in the USA or outside it. However all US citizens should have the benefit of protection of the due process clause of the 14th Amendment and the ability to have right to counsel in a civilian court.
Last edited by Cog on Mon 02 Jan 2012, 12:39:38, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron