by PrestonSturges » Mon 05 Sep 2011, 23:55:44
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peeker01', 'I')f you will look to the top of this thread, you will see it is predicated on drought and storms, not
temperature. The British Isles suffered an amazing number of droughts and famines, in spite
of it's high latitude. Do you remember the Irish potato famine?
The famine was a bacterial infection of spuds caused by a wet year, and English politics factored in.
I'm sorry if I'm shortchanging the study. It will of course be latched onto by deniers claiming it "proves" something about AGW being a hoax, because everything including whether the AFC or NFC wins supposedly disproves AGW. And a lot of that will be coming out of England no doubt. I think I already made my point.
We hear a lot of climate bunk from the UK. Like how it gets cold there and the wind turbines don't turn when it's cold, which makes sense on an island surrounded by warm water. But in the US the fossil fuel shills say that the UK example is why wind is a hoax, although when it's cold in the US it's often because the wind is blowing like an SOB from Canada. Again, UK weather is not comparable to the US, but we hear people making those dishonest comparisons on behalf of the fossil fuel industry all the time.