What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.
by Novus » Fri 08 Jan 2010, 16:13:19
Terrorism for the most part is a red herring perpetrated by the powers that be to consolidate power and remove personal freedoms. It is also being used as a pretext to get the people behind the ongoing resource wars. There is no real dealing with terrorism as it does not really exist in the context that is being played off in the media. Terrorism is a tactic of coercion much like torture is a tactic of coercion. The first part of dealing with this type of coercion is to stop believing in the lies and become educated in the truth. For the first casualty in war is the truth. The illegal resource wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are only allowed to continue because the people have been fooled by the propaganda that it is all part of the war on terrorism. There is no terrorist connection between Iraq and 9/11. Bin-laden had closer ties to the CIA then he did to the Taliban in Afghanistan. The flight 253 under pants bomber had connections to the Mossad and banking cartels. Once again terrorism lies are being used to restrict personal freedom and distract the public from the expanding war and economic depression.
The best way to fight the darkness of terrorism is to fight it with the light of the truth. The light vanquish any shadow as the truth disproves any lie. So if you really want to fight terrorism educate yourself in the truth and don't be an ignorant sheep when it comes to propaganda.
There you have it.
-

Novus
- Intermediate Crude

-
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
-
by mos6507 » Fri 08 Jan 2010, 16:16:41
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')To really combat 'terrorism'
First of all, using quotes around terrorism (as if you're Al Jazeera) pretty much says it all.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')I think one needs to understand the motive of the enemy. IE what makes them want to attack America or Americans?
If they want to express their wants, there are peaceful means to do it. Once it comes in the form of blowing up nail-bombs in a Sbarro, it's kind of too late to resolve things peacefully. You then enter into the endless war of attrition.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')You don't think it could be our constant meddling in the internal affairs of middle Eastern countries and our unconditional support of Israel, do you?
At the risk of invoking Godwin's law, one could easily talk about the terms of the end of WWI as being the "cause" for the Third Reich. It doesn't absolve the Nazis of their crimes in any way, IMHO.
The buck stops with the people committing individual crimes. Everyone has an excuse. Hitler, Charles Manson, the Japanese prior to Pearl Harbor.
Does that mean I as an individual should refrain from passing moral judgment? No. I have my own moral compass and I will raise my accusatory finger accordingly. I do not condone the deliberate murder of civilians. I also do not equate blowing up terrorist safe-houses or collateral damage in general with terrorism, mainly due to the difference in
intent.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
If you want to go down the moral relativism path, then why weep when predator drones blow up a safe house? If we've determined there are people in there that are a legitimate target, and the locals don't, then tough sh*t, right? Just as the terrorists classifying civilians as valid targets and us NOT won't stop them from killing civilians.
That's what you wind up with when you pull the moral relativism card. A race to the bottom ending in a might-makes-right genocide.
You pretty much give up the right to point holier-than-thou fingers at anyone when you do that.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', '
')Flip that around and you see what is going on. Every drone strike on a Pakistani urban area creates new enemies I don't care how you spin it.
But you have failed to offer an alternative plan other than appeasement and capitulation.
You've classified the US's interests as inherently "evil" and so you leave no reasonable options for the US to have its objectives met without resorting to violence. You're basically all but sympathizing with the terrorists the way most "moderate" muslims do when they comment on the palestinian strike du jour.
This is useless.