I've got to ask, what is the draw of the peak oil meme to dittohead right-wingers?
I know peakers CAN come from across the political spectrum, but it seems in the last year or so, the demographics of this board have shifted so much to the right that I feel like I'm reading a FoxNews talkback half of the time.
If the natural order of things is to bring back some 1950s utopia of happy motoring, then why would right-wingers decide to hang out in a place like this, in which most of us take for granted that TEOTWAWKI is gonna happen?
It's one thing if these people didn't believe in peak oil. But they often write as if they are indeed worried about peak oil. And yet at the end of the day, they cling to their brown-tech vision of the world in which ANWR, OCS, oil-shale, tar-sands, and gunboat diplomacy will insure the non-neogotiable American way of life pretty much indefinitely.
That's assuming they even talk about peak oil, rather than starting a zillion open-topic threads pushing the usual right-wing agenda of bashing entitlements and playing apologist for the rich, corporate America, and praying to the church of Ayn Rand.
If there's one thing rabid right-winders are good at, it's out-typing their opponents on places like this or under the comments of any news story. If quantity was the only measure of winning an argument, the right-wingers win every time. That their arguments normally don't elevate themselves beyond ad hominem doesn't seem to matter. If you can just keep steamrolling on the keyboard, you'll eventually burn everybody out until you're the last one typing, and you can claim victory.
So seriously, why bother? Peak oil is about change. Everybody's lives are going to change, and dittoheads don't seem to accept that. If they believe in peak oil enough, are fired up enough about the topic, to come here and brave the granola crunchers and the libertarians, then obviously there is something bothering them.
If BAU and your comfortable lifestyle really is in danger, then why not pay a little more attention to the details instead of hiding behind a wall of sloganeering and namecalling? The right-wing idology had its chance for 8 years and failed to deliver the goods. Why do they continue to cling to it as the best medicine for what ails us--against all reason to the contrary?
If libs are really so terrible, and the neocons didn't work, don't you think it's time to step back and reassess your entire way of thinking about politics in general?
I wonder whether the people here are really capable of that much higher thought.
That's why people like Planty have been accused of being paid disinformation agents, because there's no real way to have a two-way debate with him. He and others like him are merely a BS factory of one-sided attempts to slander. I keep wondering whether there's a real person behind the keyboard, someone willing to talk about what he really thinks, hopes, believes, someone capable of critical thought and reevaluation, and all I ever get from these ideologues is
facade.
It's like, when you watch the USTREAM videos of Charlie Sheen, you can tell he's not all there. He's ranting and raving his (Queen's English) US vs. Them narrative at the camera, and as crazy as he is, that's an aural representation of the sort of rhetoric that has become commonplace on the internet. People go there as a form of tribal warfare. They find their tribe, and they go on the warpath, dehumanize the other side, and so on. Actually
learning something new is anathema.
So please, enlighten me. Why do right-wingers devote so much of their lives to this place? Is it really all about being
the center of attention, no matter how negative?