Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Believing your own kool-aid

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby vision-master » Mon 28 Feb 2011, 19:19:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '
')physics hasn't stopped with Einstein. Why must you be so ridgid in your thinking?


Because this guy ain't no physicist. If I want to know about bleeding edge info on physics I'll crack open an issue of Scientific American or something.


Whatever, FYI he is a physicist

Physicist Nassim Haramein Talks About His Latest Paper: The Schwarzschild Proton

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxeBPkIE ... r_embedded
vision-master
 

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby Newfie » Mon 28 Feb 2011, 21:39:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
')I'd ask one question and if honest, I think the majority of both peakers and deniers would say that their conclusions regarding PO (overpopulation,environmental decline, GW, etc) did not develop over time and research but were pretty "instinctive" upon first exposure. For myself, I took to PO like a tar-ball to a sandy beach! My version of doom is moderate simply because I know I don't have perfect knowledge and that my view is influenced by my belief humans are not good stewards and will take the easiest route regardless of consequences.


Honest answer: I have been convinced of overpopulation since 2nd grade, 1957. Don't ask why, just was.
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby mos6507 » Mon 28 Feb 2011, 23:17:20

If you were convinced of overpopulation in 1957, how long did you think it would be before we started to pay the price, and what did that knowledge do to alter your own life path?

If someone knows we're gonna kill the planet, but isn't going to see it, what motivation is there for him to think, feel, or do anything different from if he didn't know we're gonna kill the planet? Even if he conceded that his consumptive (and reproductive) habits may be a small contributing factor, can we really expect him to avoid tragedy of the commons? It certainly wasn't true in the 10,000 year runup to today. It's only when we can see doom breathing down our necks that we start to "come to Jesus" so to speak, because we're worried about our own hides.
mos6507
 

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby Newfie » Tue 01 Mar 2011, 08:50:01

Well, I don't really know what brought that up in me and clearly it was some psychological stimulus, not my considered opinion on the science and the facts. I mean, I was 7 or 8 right? But I think I do have a disposition to hear that message.

So I thought I was messed up in the head and tried hard to "right think" for a long time. Ya know what? Maybe I was messed up in the head. Surly I am willing to hear a message that most of the herd will not. Did I take the red pill early? Or am I just out of harmony with the herd? I don't know.

In any case I see no point in trying to defend a 2nd graders opinion. I am just pointing out that there is something "different" in my early childhood experience that MAY have left me more vulnerable/open to hearing a different message latter.

But, since you asked, I never really wanted children. I thought that if anything I would adopt. My wives had different ideas and well....I've got 4 kids. I love them all. Which is very different from planning. Life happens, adapt.

And, despite my strong feelings about over-population, and my conviction that it will be our downfall, I can see no reason to argue someone out of having kids if that is what they want. But that is another topic.

So back to kool-aid. Yeah I believe in Kool-aid, I think I am a poster child for kool-aid. We all are. I'm just telling my story. What's yours?
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby vision-master » Tue 01 Mar 2011, 11:20:47

vision-master
 

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby Outcast_Searcher » Tue 01 Mar 2011, 16:35:55

Cold Fusion. Again?

As soon as there are CONSISTENTLY REPLICABLE results, then maybe there's something to look at.

And by the way, if this includes some energy bond of palladium, have you noticed how expensive an ounce of palladium is lately? So unless you have some "magical Palladium recharger" thing that takes less energy than you get out, even if this did turn out to be real -- would it ever be economic?

We might as well expect Jesus or Allah or fairies or unicorns to produce the energy we need.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby Newfie » Tue 01 Mar 2011, 18:41:55

Cold Fusion = Cool Aid

Totally appropriate to this thread!

[smilie=3some.gif]
When going through hell, keep going! Churchill
Nothing is ever lost by courtesy. It is the the cheapest of pleasures, costs nothing, and conveys much. E Wiman
I know there’s no solution, so I just enjoy what’s here and I enjoy the journey G Carlin
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby Ludi » Wed 02 Mar 2011, 20:30:09

Is it kool-aid to believe we're all going to be dead in a decade?

Or is it kool-aid not to believe it?

Apparently there are hordes of human locusts/cannibals wandering western Australia, Brazil, and Pakistan, devouring everything in their path. Or is that kool-aid?

Very rational-seeming people promote this stuff as happening "right now."

8O
Ludi
 

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby mos6507 » Wed 02 Mar 2011, 21:32:28

I'm reminded of Peak Shrink's recent article where she tries to debunk Maslow's Heirarchy of needs.

This raises my hackles. It's hard to explain why that is, because on the surface, I agree with her premise. Yes, we need to redefine happiness. Yes, we have to learn to be happy with less. But I guess why I see something like that as "kool-aid" is that I really sense an overriding wishful-thinking subtext, which is that doom will somehow bottom out at something other than a malthusian die-off. But people like her or Sharon Astyk can't just come out and say we're gonna have a malthusian die-off because it makes anything you do in the interim seem pointless. So you kind of have to lie about what our chances are, and that's something I can't stand. I think that's why I've kind of withdrawn from the Transition movement to think this over because I feel like I'd have to lie about what I think is looming ahead for us, just to inspire people to do anything but eat drink and be merry.

So the kool-aid thing with doomers is very much a matter of the white lie of hope that we need to get through each day, vs. the despair we feel when we rationally crunch the numbers.
mos6507
 

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby Ludi » Wed 02 Mar 2011, 21:37:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '
')So the kool-aid thing with doomers is very much a matter of the white lie of hope that we need to get through each day, vs. the despair we feel when we rationally crunch the numbers.



:(
Ludi
 

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby Newfie » Thu 03 Mar 2011, 00:08:48

I really do believe that we ALL believe our own kool-aid, even you Ludi.

But in that there is a strain of hope, because you can choose your own flavor.

I am by nature pessimistic, I believe most of us here are, even the deniers. They are like closeted gays railing against gay porn (or preachers with hookers, or .....) They are locked into some role so far they don't realize who they really are, but are still fascinated by the spectacle.

We are all here because we have some strain of doomer kool-aid addiction, or else we wouldn't be here.

With rare exception, most folks here are simply doing the best they can to make sense of it and find a way forward.

Knowing, and accepting that you are drinking the kool-aid is admitting that you have some role in your mental health. And if you have some control then you can make some inprovement.

For me that has been to concentrate on trying to set things up so that we can survive a urban meltdown and also retain some joy in life.

I suspect that gardening has a similar role for some, or building machinery, or chicken coops, or whatever. Also, I've taken up welding, kinda makes me feel useful once again. So, I'm mixing my own kool-aid blend. Not great but drinkable, hoping to get better, the "secret recipe."
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby vision-master » Thu 03 Mar 2011, 09:38:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', 'C')old Fusion. Again?

As soon as there are CONSISTENTLY REPLICABLE results, then maybe there's something to look at.

And by the way, if this includes some energy bond of palladium, have you noticed how expensive an ounce of palladium is lately? So unless you have some "magical Palladium recharger" thing that takes less energy than you get out, even if this did turn out to be real -- would it ever be economic?

We might as well expect Jesus or Allah or fairies or unicorns to produce the energy we need.


The only way we can have a better future is to start dreaming it. We are capable of anything if we put our minds to it. :)

Remember, the term 'cold fusion' is a misnomer. Sounds like they really don't know how it works. So, forget the label 'cold fusion'. BTY: I'm NOT part of the peak oil cult doomer group think anymore. :wink:
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby pedalling_faster » Thu 03 Mar 2011, 10:23:57

a lot of times the Kool-Aid people believe is what they have been taught.

for example, in the 1990's a Jewish historian named Walter Sanning published a book named "Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry". he did a study of census records and found that there were 3.5 million Jewish people in occupied Europe at he beginning of World War 2. this raised a fairly obvious question - how did WW2 Germany get ahold of 6 million Jewish people ?
http://www.amazon.com/Dissolution-Easte ... 0939484110

the end result was that the plaque at Auschwitz was revised, also in the 1990's, from "in memory of the 4 million who died", to "in memory of the 1 1/2 million who died" (to balance the math, the implication is that the 2 million Jewish persons who perished at WW2 Germany's hands did so outside of Auschwitz, at another location - not too controversial.)

however, the official figure for the Shoah is 6 million. every year, American teachers perform a form of strange child abuse by making American school-children contemplate a catastrophe that did not occur - as taught.

one other fact in the equation is the emigration rate of Jewish people to the United States just prior to the war and at the beginning of the war. historian George Armstrong puts this number at 3000 a day - a little over 1 million a year.

so where did WW2 Germany obtain the extra Jewish people to do the evil he is accused of ?

the other factor is the numbers of Jewish people who emigrated to Israel, as outlined in the book, "The Transfer Agreement" - by Edwin Black
http://www.transferagreement.com/
http://www.amazon.com/Transfer-Agreemen ... 0786708417

long story short, sometimes Americans believe a Kool-Aid because it was part of their indoctrination.
http://www.LASIK-Flap.com/ ~ Health Warning about LASIK Eye Surgery
User avatar
pedalling_faster
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1399
Joined: Sat 10 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby vision-master » Thu 03 Mar 2011, 10:35:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'l')ong story short, sometimes Americans believe a Kool-Aid because it was part of their indoctrination.


This place is loaded with these conventional thinkers.
vision-master
 
Top

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby FairMaiden » Thu 03 Mar 2011, 21:20:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '
')physics hasn't stopped with Einstein. Why must you be so ridgid in your thinking?


Because this guy ain't no physicist. If I want to know about bleeding edge info on physics I'll crack open an issue of Scientific American or something.


Excuse me? Who the heck do you think you are to decide who is a physicist and who is not? He has his PhD in physics so I'm pretty sure he qualifies under MOST ppl's definition. Maybe you've been spiking your own koolaid with so much cynicism that you can't see things as clearly as you think you can.

I have personally met Nassim and he is the real deal. He doesn't do his research in universities bc then it would belong to the university and those that pad the university wallet.

I have only 2nd year university physics but I don't need to go off my opinion of his work - it's PEER reviewed and has passed. PHYSICISTS have reviewed and VALIDATED his work. So I really don't understand how YOU think you know better. What is your accreditation that we should believe what you say about another scientist's work???

I've been on this site for 7 yrs and seen a lot of bullocks. I didn't post for a solid year bc the geological discussions were beyond me and I didn't feel I had anything to contribute to the discussions. But I do follow modern physics and I enjoy the theoretic creativity we are seeing today (multiple dimension theory, string theory or the plasma theory).
User avatar
FairMaiden
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC
Top

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby mos6507 » Thu 03 Mar 2011, 22:41:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FairMaiden', '
')I don't need to go off my opinion of his work - it's PEER reviewed


Where's the peer reviewed paper on "Nibiru has come and gone"?
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby vision-master » Fri 04 Mar 2011, 09:56:50

moss is an ridged extremist doomer, who see's zero hope for humanity in the future, I'm just the opposite. :)
vision-master
 

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby mos6507 » Fri 04 Mar 2011, 11:13:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'm')oss is an ridged extremist doomer


You finally outed me, V-M. I knew you could spot an alien.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby Puchica » Fri 04 Mar 2011, 11:22:36

The argument against the Holocaust is a good example of how one can narrowly select statistics to obfuscate. Although the number of Jews in Europe is cited, the argument fails to take into acount that not all Jews killed in the Holocaust lived or died in Europe. Quite a number were killed in the Ukraine.
From the secure heights
Puchica
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed 02 Feb 2011, 08:35:51

Re: Believing your own kool-aid

Postby FairMaiden » Fri 04 Mar 2011, 23:31:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FairMaiden', '
')I don't need to go off my opinion of his work - it's PEER reviewed


Where's the peer reviewed paper on "Nibiru has come and gone"?


Mos - I'm not refering to that speech (I had not seen it until you posted the link). My discussions with Nassim did not involve his spirtuality or beliefs on existential work. He clearly says, "it's hard to get data, I think, etc" so this is NOT his work as a physics. No where did he mention physics! Just because he believes this stuff and you don't, does not discredit his work on event horizon and the big bang. But it really doesn't matter either way. He is still a physicist because he earned the degree and title.

I suppose that means Christian scientist lose their titles and their merits are discredited if we don't believe in God?

I wonder if Nassim had discussed these views with me how I would feel about his work...I might have thought he was a crackpot too. But our discussions were not so serious (maybe it was the atmosphere as we were snorkeling and most of it occured on the boat in between swims).

Oh and as to the original question on this thread. I read it somewhere that self denial is required for survival. If we thought a tiger was going to hunt us down and eat us - we wouldn't get with the business of hunting and gathering. We would be too frightened. But if we don't hunt and gather, we starve. So we have to bustle about denying that tigers are out there trying to hunt us.
User avatar
FairMaiden
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 368
Joined: Thu 11 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron