Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The first energy crisis--before my time

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby Leanan » Wed 18 May 2005, 17:52:47

Would be interesting to see if commuting distances have gotten longer since the '70s. My feeling is that they have, but I don't have any hard numbers.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: 70s Oil Crisis

Unread postby lexicon » Wed 18 May 2005, 18:18:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'I') was talking with a friend today about the '70s oil crisis. (He had seen a promo for Oil Storm, and we got to discussing gas prices.) He was old enough to be driving during the '70s oil shock, and remembers it as being terrible.


Hey, do you know when Oil Storm is going to air? I'd like to watch it or tape it.
User avatar
lexicon
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Tue 08 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby RockHind » Wed 18 May 2005, 18:24:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')xample: A minimum wage worker can only buy about 2 gallons of gas for an hours' work right now. This compares to nearly 4 gallons a couple of years ago.


I do not think that a minimum wage worker can afford to own or operate a car currently in the United States.
User avatar
RockHind
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat 19 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: S Florida

Unread postby Daculling » Wed 18 May 2005, 19:15:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', 'p')up55 ...good point but in regards to the schmoe at the bottom of the heap. Back in the mid-70's he likely drove a huge chrysler or chev with fuel economy that is no where near what he can get from his KIA or SmartCar today.


Rockdoc123... I assume you don't live in the U.S. (what the hell is a KIA?) The first thing graduates want when they land that $40K U.S. job is a SUV.

Pup55... Maybe you could caculate against a barrel of crude seeing that everything we consume is based on that. That way you get buying power across the board.

On a side note, it scares me when I speake with older people about peak oil (I'm low 30's). They get this frightened look on there face and say "You mean like the gas lines?". And then I realize that they don't get it, and neither do I... scary.
Daculling
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby scrod » Wed 18 May 2005, 21:23:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daculling', '
')Rockdoc123... I assume you don't live in the U.S. (what the hell is a KIA?)


Not to get off-topic, but I'm sure these people would be happy to tell you.
User avatar
scrod
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon 07 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby ubercrap » Wed 18 May 2005, 21:34:44

Right, Kia's are Korean cars readily available in the states, SmartCars were going to be imported, but Mercedes axed that idea. :?
User avatar
ubercrap
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Wed 27 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby k_semler » Wed 18 May 2005, 21:55:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RockHind', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')xample: A minimum wage worker can only buy about 2 gallons of gas for an hours' work right now. This compares to nearly 4 gallons a couple of years ago.


I do not think that a minimum wage worker can afford to own or operate a car currently in the United States.


Federal or state? Federal minimum wage is only $5.15 per hour, and yes it would be quite imossible to own a car on this wage. Washington State is a $7.36/hr, and it is quite possible to own a car at this wage, (albeit at a not-so-great standard of living).
Here Lies the United States Of America.

July 04, 1776 - June 23 2005

Epitaph: "The Experiment Is Over."

Rest In Peace.

Eminent Domain Was The Murderer.
k_semler
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1797
Joined: Mon 17 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Democratic People's Republic of Washington
Top

Unread postby pup55 » Wed 18 May 2005, 22:01:01

http://peakoil.com/fortopic1121.html

My bad. All of my spreadsheets are in this post, along with an explanation of the index.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')up55... Maybe you could caculate against a barrel of crude seeing that everything we consume is based on that. That way you get buying power across the board.


I will look at it.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')KIA or SmartCar today


In 1977, I owned a 1965 ford mustang, that got 20 miles per gallon city and 25 highway. Today, I am driving a POS Kia that gets 20 miles per gallon city and 25 highway, so not much difference, except back then, I was driving a classic mustang, and now, I am driving a little korean piece of junk.

Smart car: Don't know the price on these but the average schmoe in the US is not going to get one. Also, I do not want to drive one of these in a blizzard in Nebraska next to an 18-wheeler, unlike the mustang, which had great ground clearance.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') do not think that a minimum wage worker can afford to own or operate a car currently in the United States.


An interesting point. There are junkers to still be had if you are resourceful enough. I will have to give this further thought.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby cube » Thu 19 May 2005, 00:09:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'W')ould be interesting to see if commuting distances have gotten longer since the '70s. My feeling is that they have, but I don't have any hard numbers.
Without question it has. There's no need to dig up fancy stats, it's pretty much a given. Back in the days when my dad was working, 30 minutes was considered a long commute. Today most people would be very envious of you if you said you had a 30 minute commute each way. At least in California. I'm quite sure all the other states aren't much different except that in CA it's much more obvious.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Thu 19 May 2005, 00:34:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n 1977, I owned a 1965 ford mustang, that got 20 miles per gallon city and 25 highway. Today, I am driving a POS Kia that gets 20 miles per gallon city and 25 highway, so not much difference, except back then, I was driving a classic mustang, and now, I am driving a little korean piece of junk.


Ah yes but in 1977 you were pumping out way more pollution than any of us can today imagine. Part of the trade off in the seventies was pollution control on vehicles which of course meant worse mileage but better life quality for your fellow citizens. In late 1977 I was driving a 1976Gran Torino......sucked gas beyond belief....had previously had a 1965 Volvo PV544 which got much better mileage than your classic
mustang......everything is relative I'm afraid.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby jaakkeli » Thu 19 May 2005, 03:38:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'W')ould be interesting to see if commuting distances have gotten longer since the '70s. My feeling is that they have, but I don't have any hard numbers.


Without question it has. There's no need to dig up fancy stats, it's pretty much a given. Back in the days when my dad was working, 30 minutes was considered a long commute.


Distance isn't the same thing as time, though. I'm guessing most of the US also has worse congestion these days, so commuting times must've gotten longer by a bigger % than commuting distances.
User avatar
jaakkeli
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu 10 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Finland
Top

Unread postby pup55 » Thu 19 May 2005, 08:38:34

Here is my spreadsheet on income, taxes, and mortgage
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
') Income Taxes Mortgage Ccard disp income
2005 Est 26,107
2004 $44,531 $9,799 $7,980 $963 $25,789
2003 $43,658 $9,607 $7,624 $956 $25,471
2002 $42,802 $9,419 $7,562 $932 $24,888
2001 $42,629 $9,381 $7,795 $865 $24,587
2000 $42,233 $9,850 $8,172 $810 $23,401
1999 $40,750 $9,447 $7,477 $781 $23,045
1998 $38,967 $9,073 $7,088 $748 $22,059
1997 $37,177 $9,153 $6,903 $696 $20,425
1996 $35,486 $8,740 $6,470 $606 $19,669
1995 $34,106 $8,383 $6,099 $509 $19,115
1994 $32,385 $7,925 $5,654 $445 $18,362
1993 $31,272 $7,655 $5,349 $418 $17,850
1992 $30,631 $7,498 $5,711 $394 $17,028
1991 $30,147 $7,416 $5,743 $356 $16,632
1990 $29,781 $7,335 $6,062 $315 $16,069
1989 $28,925 $7,052 $5,876 $279 $15,718
1988 $27,291 $6,637 $5,709 $244 $14,701
1987 $26,055 $6,045 $5,116 $222 $14,672
1986 $24,979 $6,190 $5,046 $191 $13,552
1985 $23,735 $5,801 $5,470 $152 $12,312
1984 $22,547 $5,332 $6,141 $123 $10,950
1983 $21,105 $5,019 $5,854 $111 $10,121
1982 $20,195 $4,940 $6,109 $105 $9,042
1981 $19,141 $4,822 $6,550 $97 $7,672
1980 $17,807 $4,217 $5,465 $91 $8,035
1979 $16,495 $3,810 $4,160 $76 $8,449
1978 $15,010 $3,235 $3,263 $65 $8,447
1977 $13,671 $2,834 $2,752 $33 $8,052
1976 $12,762 $2,582 $2,480 $28 $7,672
1975 $11,787 $2,361 $2,288 $26 $7,113
1974 $11,206 $2,164 $2,028 $22 $6,992
1973 $10,402 $1,942 $1,688 $19 $6,753
1972 $9,625 $1,579 $1,571 $17 $6,458
1971 $8,965 $1,428 $1,456 $10 $6,071


And, here is the amount of disposable income divided by the crude oil price and gasoline price of the day:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')disp income $/bbl oil OAI fuel price GAI
2005 Est 26107 50 522 2.2 11867
2004 Est 25789 40 645 1.95 13225
2003 25471 29 883 1.51 16868
2002 24888 25 995 1.48 16816
2001 24587 24 1006 1.53 16070
2000 23401 28 821 1.56 15000
1999 23045 18 1282 1.22 18889
1998 22059 13 1735 1.12 19695
1997 20425 19 1070 1.29 15834
1996 19669 21 952 1.29 15248
1995 19115 17 1123 1.21 15797
1994 18362 16 1161 1.17 15694
1993 17850 17 1052 1.17 15256
1992 17028 19 881 1.19 14309
1991 16632 20 831 1.2 13860
1990 16069 24 677 1.22 13171
1989 15718 18 862 1.06 14828
1988 14701 15 985 0.96 15314
1987 14672 18 800 0.96 15284
1986 13552 14 946 0.93 14573
1985 12312 28 447 1.2 10260
1984 10950 29 380 1.2 9125
1983 10121 29 352 1.23 8229
1982 9042 32 285 1.28 7064
1981 7672 34 224 1.35 5683
1980 8035 36 225 1.22 6586
1979 8449 30 281 0.88 9601
1978 8447 14 621 0.65 12996
1977 8052 13 605 0.64 12582
1976 7672 12 620 0.6 12787
1975 7113 12 617 0.57 12479
1974 6992 12 604 0.53 13193
1973 6753 3 2053 0.39 17315
1972 6458 2 2604 0.36 17939
1971 6071 2 2710 0.36 16864


The above data is for somebody with the median income in the US in dollars of the day.

The "average person disposable income" (net of mortgage payments, credit card payments and taxes) today can only buy about 522 barrels of oil, or 12,000 gallons of gas (at $50 oil and $2.20 for gas). This is worse than it was during the oil problems of the 70's, but still better than the oil problems of 1981, when the combination of really high interest rates and really high oil prices got it down to only 224 barrels of oil or 5600 gallons of gas.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
') 1975 2005
Gas Price 0.6 2.2
Income/yr 11,500 35,000
Gallons 19167 15909


The average college graduate is about 20% worse off today, in terms of fuel purchasing power, than he or she was in 1975.

Here is the same calculation for beer:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
') 1975 2005
Beer/glass 0.35 2.5
Income/yr 11,500 35,000
Beers 32857 14000


Poor grad, he or she has 50% less beer purchasing power than in 1975. I don't know what's worse.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Oil Storm

Unread postby Leanan » Thu 19 May 2005, 08:57:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ey, do you know when Oil Storm is going to air? I'd like to watch it or tape it.


It's supposed to air June 5 on fX. I'm sure there will be plenty of reminders around here as the date gets nearer. :)
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Oil Storm

Unread postby Daculling » Thu 19 May 2005, 09:06:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ey, do you know when Oil Storm is going to air? I'd like to watch it or tape it.


It's supposed to air June 5 on fX. I'm sure there will be plenty of reminders around here as the date gets nearer. :)


And I hope someone torrents it for those of us that don't have cable.
Daculling
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Thu 19 May 2005, 09:41:49

Pup 55. Interesting numbers....especially the one that shows purchasing power for things other than oil (your example beer) has suffered worse than that for petrol. I have a question in regards to the raw data. One of the things that might throw error into the analysis is the assumption that all the distributions are either normal or non-skewed lognormal. I suspect that isn't the case. I can't remember where I read it but apparently 80% of the North American wealth is in the hands of 20% of the population. That 20% doesn't necessarily consume more food or fuel. It would be interesting to see the full distributions of these "mean" estimates for the various variables. As well it would be interesting to look at how many are totally independent variables versus dependant. A good check on your analysis would be to look at a single wage earner in 1975 versus the equivalent wage earner in 2005. As an example you could take the salary of a plumber in 1975, assume he would drive a 5-10 year old car with the equivalent gas mileage, figure out what the level of his mortgage would be ....etc. etc. This would avoid the possible statistical problems.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby pup55 » Thu 19 May 2005, 10:24:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ne of the things that might throw error into the analysis is the assumption that all the distributions are either normal or non-skewed lognormal.


You are quite right of course. The US department of commerce income data is split out by quartiles, so the results will probably be slightly different for the upper quartile. We would have to change the assumptions on housing too, since I used the "average house" instead of the McMansion.

Looking at the situation as it applies to a particular occupation might also be interesting. I will look for some data.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby RiverRat » Thu 19 May 2005, 10:44:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RockHind', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')xample: A minimum wage worker can only buy about 2 gallons of gas for an hours' work right now. This compares to nearly 4 gallons a couple of years ago.


I do not think that a minimum wage worker can afford to own or operate a car currently in the United States.


Huh … I live in the proverbial steel and coal rust belt (Appalachia). I can tell you - there are whole armies of impoverished low waged people driving their ‘beaters’ all over God’s country. The have to get to work at Wal-Mart or some ‘ABC Cleaning Service’ somehow.

There are car lots all over the place where I live that cater to the ‘disposable car’ mentality. You know … $700 bucks ‘out the door’ … dents, rust, bald tires, super high miles, duct tape quarter panels and the whole nine yards. And hey … well see ya again in 6 months.

For every 1 steel worker or coal miner driving their new 500 hp ‘dually diesel’ … there are 10 people driving a beat up ’91 Cavalier with 150,000 miles.
If ...'If's' and 'But's' ... were Candy and Nuts ... we would all be happy and fat !
RiverRat
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Fatcats vs. Schmoes

Unread postby pup55 » Thu 19 May 2005, 11:43:03

Here is your data on the energy purchasing power of fatcats vs. schmoes since 1971:


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Fatcat Schmoe Fatcat Schmoe
bbl oil bbl oil Gal Fuel Gal Fuel
2005 Est 3395 522 77164 11867
2004 Est 4120 645 84521 13225
2003 5639 883 107664 16868
2002 6275 995 106101 16816
2001 6681 1006 106735 16070
2000 5329 821 97347 15000
1999 7925 1282 116732 18889
1998 10565 1735 119948 19695
1997 6661 1070 98593 15834
1996 5743 952 92017 15248
1995 6547 1123 92073 15797
1994 6925 1161 93623 15694
1993 6133 1052 88957 15256
1992 4154 881 67443 14309
1991 3731 831 62190 13860
1990 3117 677 60620 13171
1989 4106 862 70602 14828
1988 4370 985 67934 15314
1987 3536 800 67522 15284
1986 3869 946 59569 14573
1985 1717 447 39383 10260
1984 1333 380 31972 9125
1983 1203 352 28131 8229
1982 913 285 22646 7064
1981 593 224 15067 5683
1980 656 225 19203 6586
1979 949 281 32377 9601
1978 2120 621 44351 12996
1977 2050 605 42601 12582
1976 2076 620 42842 12787
1975 2053 617 41535 12479
1974 2026 604 44268 13193
1973 7420 2053 62592 17315
1972 9785 2604 67410 17939
1971 9745 2710 60638 16864


(I made the following assumptions: The rich guy's house is 6 times more expensive than the average, and also, the rich guy is taxed at the same average rate as the average guy. Both rich and average are assumed to have the same credit card debt and pay the same mortgage rate)

At the present time, a person in the highest 5% of income (per the US Dept of Commerce) can buy about 6.5 times more fuel than an average guy with his disposable income, after taxes, mortgage, and credit card debt.

However, in 1981, the worst it ever got, the fatcat could only buy 2.5 times more fuel as the average guy.

So, the fatcats are roughly 3 times better off than the average schmoes in terms of impact of the current energy price rise, compared to 1981.

What is really alarming about this is what happened in the pre-oilcrash-pre-US production peak "good old days" of 1971. The average guy was able to buy 16,000 gallons of gas with his leftover income in 1971. Nowadays, this has shrunk to 11,000 give or take. However, the fatcat's ability to buy gas has actually improved during this time. An earner in the upper 5% of the income range can buy 77,000 gallons of gas, at present prices, compared to only about 60,000 in 1971.

So you see, dear reader, the double annoyance of high fuel prices and stagnant wages has really screwed the proverbial middle class (or lower), proportionally more than the fatcats. It appears that the main plumpening up of the fatcats occurred in the late '90's during the market boom, when these guys had an income increase, mortgage rates went down, as did taxes, at the same time as the era of cheap gas.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Thu 19 May 2005, 13:05:14

Good one Pup55. This kind of analysis is really useful because it gets to the heart of the matter as to why we are where we are.....good ole greed and avarice methinks.
Makes me think back to my undergrad economics courses that dealt with materialism and the rise of communism in the Soviet Union.....oh oh can history repeat itself?

Scenario: Oil prices rise to $80/bbl and fuel costs follow....manufacturing goods also follow suit due to higher op costs. Joe Blow on the street can't afford anything but the "fat cats" are still consuming and driving prices even higher. Large gangs of disgruntled Average Schmoes form and raid Bill Gates bunker in Seattle and then a separate group take Warren Buffett hostage and threaten to behead him unless Bush releases all of the oil in strategic storage. OK a bit of Sci Fi there.
But a snapshot of reality is back in the late eighties/early nineties I was in Algers ....it was a pretty good place, friendly people, beautiful climate, good food and even the wine wasn't that bad. Then the Dinar devalued to half in just a couple of days. The Average Algerian Schmoe went from being able to buy enough food for his family to not being able to even afford unleavened bread. Unemployment skyrocketed because there was noone buying anything that was made. The Mullahs took quick advantage and sold all the young average schmoes on the fact that they had no future in this life but the next one would be good....virgins and good food for everyone! Hence the situation where they are now.
So do you think it could happen in North America as well?
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: 70s Oil Crisis

Unread postby Cash » Thu 19 May 2005, 13:32:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'I') was talking with a friend today about the '70s oil crisis. (He had seen a promo for Oil Storm, and we got to discussing gas prices.) He was old enough to be driving during the '70s oil shock, and remembers it as being terrible. He was working as a cable installer, and so needed gas. He would go to the gas station at 10pm, park at the pump, and go to sleep. When he woke up the next day, the line behind him would be blocks long. 8O

He also remembers the economic effects as being devastating. No one had money for gas or shopping, so his once-bustling neighborhood became a ghost town. People were losing their jobs left and right. Crime rose, because people were frustrated and didn't have anything else to do. It's not something he ever wants to see happen again.


Your friend's description is a little over the top. The oil crisis of 1973-74 led to lines at gas pumps and some nasty arguments in a few places, but overall people coped rather well once new consumption patterns were established. States imposed odd-even rationing schemes and the feds mandated 55 mph speed limits and things evened out rather quickly. The only day when traffic seemed to be distinctly affected as I recall was Sunday, when all the gas stations were closed. But "people losing their jobs right and left"? No, didn't happen. Shopping areas turned into ghost towns? Not that I ever heard or saw. Camping out at the gas station? We had maybe a week when some folks might have thought that was necessary.

The job losses came a year later, when we slid into a nasty recession, rather like the one that hit after the second oil crisis in 1979.

The one thing I remember from that time was the sense of people pulling together. Maybe it was leftover idealism from the 1960s, but there was a real enthusiasm for dealing with this mess and getting past it, because we all knew it was temporary. That, I think, is the major difference between those energy crises and the one facing us now -- this one will be permanent. That will have a major psychological impact.

Cash
User avatar
Cash
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron