by Lore » Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:19:11
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dsula', 'I') agree, but that's the exception. Small and medium size companies are the norm, maybe even owner operated. They deserve what the earn. Even if it's millions.
To solve your big company problem you don't have to tax at an insane level. Much better is to break up companies. Limit the size to a few 1000 employees, or limit their value. That's what solves the problem much better than high taxes.
If an individual is earning millions, they are no longer in the bottom 98 percentile. No one is denying them their millions that they earn. Only the disproportionate rate at which the income is being taxed and how this wealth is then being distributed.
For example, if the former President and Chairman of Bank of America, Ken Lewis, upon his severance was only given 25 million instead of the 100 million that he reportedly received, and the rest of the 75 million was given in $50,000 awards to 1,500 middle class workers. The return to the economy would have been an order of magnitude greater and Ken Lewis would still be the wealthier for it.
Limiting companies to a 1,000 or fewer employees would be neither productive or practical on a planet with this many consumers. The net effect would be higher prices defeating the very purpose of the exercise. Although, part of the problem now is that we have the ability to produce more than we can afford to consume.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt