by Sixstrings » Tue 09 Nov 2010, 19:45:20
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'I') noticed that there isn't even a psychology forum.
I think that's a good thing. Obsessing over doom is enough as it is.. we don't need to add obsessing over our obsessing.

I dunno, I just think a psychology section would invite too much discussion of things that folks are best off getting advice and / or help elsewhere.
Peak Oil is one of many bad bad things we may or may not have to deal with. For all we know, we could spend years talking about peak oil just to get blindsided by WWIII, or a real Great Depression, or hyperinflation doom, etc. And Guess what's worse than peak oil and hyperinflation doom? Heart attacks and cancer for one, and a lot of us statistically will have to deal with one or the other. So what is it about "global doom" that's so much scarier we need a special psychology section of the forum?
Which leads me to another point.. to be honest, and I include myself here, all the fear and worry that gets wrapped up in doomer topics has an element of transference going on. I think we're worrying about this stuff rather than worrying about something else. That's not to say what we talk about isn't important.. just stop to think why you're so interested in this stuff.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t's all about preps and analysis. I'm not against preps and analysis,
but that's not all there is to life.
This conundrum has been mentioned before -- that we're wasting our time here. Anticipatory fear and angst are, essentially, a WASTE of time. Ok, let's say you have a bunker and ten years of preps -- there are still thousands of "SHTF" things that can go down that you have no way to avoid or plan for.
As for myself.. I talk about this stuff because I'm interested in it. And maybe like I said there's some transference of worry going on too. But anyhow why the self doubt? For whatever reason we're drawn to discuss these issues.. some folks talk about sports all the time, or the weather.
. It's because in part, she says, she values connection to family above the simple number-crunching of what area is more "survivable" than others.