Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

2010 US elections

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Dreamtwister » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 11:14:52

Yeah, let's put the Republicans back in power. That will make things so much better! :roll:
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 11:16:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ian807', 'S')o, republicans win the house, and in two years, maybe the presidency.

Like the dog who caught the car, what do they do with it now?



First of all, impeach Obama.

Second, make things even tougher for the average person, and especially for the poor and disadvantaged.

Enjoy the New Feudalism!
Ludi
 

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby efarmer » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 11:21:33

We are on the undulating plateau of peak petroleum, it is the part of the cheap energy ride where supply and demand, the cost of infrastructure for new supply versus the market price during bouts of demand destruction, and a ream of other factors including market speculators tweak the curve up and down to drive the undulating results into reality. So too it is with our politics, the Liberal and Conservative notions we adopted in the era when human initiative and consensus were more important than resource availability are being grasped and dumped in an undulating cycle by people looking for a way to make the economic conditions firm up under their feet again.

If it is known anywhere, it is known on this site, that it is well past time for more people to obtain a clearer picture of where we actually are in terms of energy resources and their economic purchase in a society that was founded and flourished on cheap oil. And right after this intellectual tsunami breaks on the shore of consciousness and runs it's mental and emotional course and begins to yield the inevitable question of what to do about the situation, we need to seriously hunker down as a nation and in all nations based on the petroleum exploit and adopt consensus plans and responses and move on them.

Until that time, we can pretend we are facing issues of Liberal and Conservative doctrine and yo yo elected people in and out of offices that simply are not involved in addressing the real underlying issue of our time for us to address. In the twilight of the consumption, exploit, generation that I am a part of, it is time for us to pivot to grasping and grappling with resource limits and to attempt to place those who follow behind us in time, into a situation that has the best chances of sustaining them.

Until then politically, we will continue to swap dirty underwear in red and blue colors on and off of the body politic.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Sixstrings » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 11:42:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', ''')Dems had to know they were going to lose no matter what they did, I just wish they had done something...


I agree. Obama and the Democratic congress wasted an opportunity. They were too afraid of being painted socialist, so they go and pass Mitt Romneycare and guess what -- they get tagged as socialist! :roll: If only they'd passed a fair public option, or any other kind of genuine universal healthcare, then they could lose and at least have something to be proud of. But nope, the way things went down they just lost their base, lost the independents, and the Right is still mad at them.

And, they screwed up the stimulus at a time of economic depression when the economy really needs it. And then they did nothing about this new structural 20% unemployment we have -- yeah, they extended comp out to 99 weeks for some folks in some states but that's running out now and all those Americans are just SOL.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]I really do think there is a difference in ideology, it's just that dems, by and large, don't have that certainty and conviction that comes from truly believing God is on your side and therefore everyone else is not only wrong but morally inferior.


There is a liberal wing of the Democratic party, but ever since Clinton the party has been corporatist-dominated. If you remember, back then they called them the "New Democrats." To win elections, the party become more right-wing. And so now there's a big chunk of the Dems who are "blue dogs," really just Republicans. Add the blue dogs along with the Republican minority fillibuster in the Senate, and you end up with a structure where we have Republican policies regardless of which "party" has the majority.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 12:07:07

It will be interesting to see the Tea Party members kneel to their new corporate masters.

On the other hand, I think their level of commitment is (as LBJ put it) "thin as piss on a rock."

Prediction of GOP civil war may be overblown because the Tea Party may simply evaporate without the corporate backing.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 13:20:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', ' ')it is time for us to pivot to grasping and grappling with resource limits and to attempt to place those who follow behind us in time, into a situation that has the best chances of sustaining them.



That's all faboo and stuff, but here we are stuck with Reps and Dems. Can you explain to me ANY Republican policies which ensure those who follow us will live in a world which can sustain them? Or are you suggesting we just pretend politics doesn't exist and/or doesn't matter?
Ludi
 

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby efarmer » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 15:29:38

Hard to say how many throw the bums out and put the newbies in cycles it will take before people realize it is useless and are open to reality based approaches Ludi. I don't pretend much and therefore do not expect the politics to change much until people realize that what we are doing is a futile exercise and therefore become open to the exploratorium it is going to take.

So far as Republican or Democrat policies are concerned, we aren't going anywhere until we match our ideas to the world as it is instead of attempting to match the world to our ideas by brute force and kicking the can down the road to nowhere.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 16:33:34

Efarmer, what about the idea of full person-hood for women and contraception available to all who need it is not matched to the world as it is?

BTW, full person-hood for women and contraception available to all is a DEMOCRATIC policy position, not a Republican one.

What ARE these "reality-based approaches" you're talking about? You keep posting these kind of lectures about how politics is futile (trying to discourage voting so Reps will get in power? 8O 8O 8O ) but you don't seem to be starting ANY threads about reality-based approaches or what we should be doing instead of partisan politics. Seriously. Could you start some threads in the Planning Forum about what you think we should be doing? Or will you just keep coming in to political threads and telling us politics is useless?

<<<< slightly irritated :x
Ludi
 

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby efarmer » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 17:32:03

You are aware of resource limits and climate issues Ludi. Most people are either not or they are convinced they are trumped up diversions or schemes, which in some cases they sometimes are. I don't have any idea what to write in the planning forum because my belief is that the discomfort of life not working correctly for enough people will eventually cure the politics that they are able to avail themselves of and use to implement plans and actions. This will happen as the consequences themselves drive behaviors and not in response to people simply preaching the message to them (until they are ready to open their minds to consideration of alternative realities).

In the meantime I have folks who depend on me to eat and be educated and this is where my focus needs to be. I am positive about the outcome, but I realize that it takes a large number of people to suffer negative consequences before they are open to learn and vote for the sort of things that will start the process of transition.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Cog » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 18:37:16

Ludi thinks politics matter on stopping or limiting the damage that Peak Oil is going to do to the social fabric. He could not be more wrong. It makes no practical difference whether the Republicans win or lose the Congress tomorrow. Or the presidency in 2012.
User avatar
Cog
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13416
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Northern Kekistan

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Cid_Yama » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 19:04:52

Nonsense. If the Republicans win, the average American will be kicked to the gutter.

Their greed decimated the world economy. To the point that worldwide shipping stopped.

Then they have the gall to tell the unemployed that they are just lazy bums, and that if they really wanted a job they'ld be willing to mine coal for $1.50 hr, with no regulation of the industry.

Republican policies are pure evil as to their effect on the average American.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst and provide for it." - Patrick Henry

The level of injustice and wrong you endure is directly determined by how much you quietly submit to. Even to the point of extinction.
User avatar
Cid_Yama
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7169
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Post Peak Oil Historian

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 20:00:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', ' ')This will happen as the consequences themselves drive behaviors and not in response to people simply preaching the message to them (until they are ready to open their minds to consideration of alternative realities).



But you keep on preachin' anyway. :x
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 20:03:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cid_Yama', ' ')if they really wanted a job they'ld be willing to mine coal for $1.50 hr, with no regulation of the industry.




That's the goal of the Republicans/Tea Party, isn't it? No unions, no protection of wages or working conditions, no regulation.

What's in it for the average person?

Nothing.

Welcome to the New Feudalism.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Lore » Mon 01 Nov 2010, 20:17:14

Somehow it has now become un-American to want to earn more then average Chinese wages, let alone organize for workers benefits while corporate moguls can collude all day. There is a last laugh here, although I don’t know who will be around to give it. The new conservative politics and corporate greed is winning a race to the bottom.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 01:41:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', 'H')ard to say how many throw the bums out and put the newbies in cycles it will take before people realize it is useless

Image
dvorak.org
Facebook knows you're a dog.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby careinke » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 03:56:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ian807', 'S')o, republicans win the house, and in two years, maybe the presidency.

Like the dog who caught the car, what do they do with it now?



First of all, impeach Obama.

Second, make things even tougher for the average person, and especially for the poor and disadvantaged.

Enjoy the New Feudalism!


Really? Where pray tell did that come from?
Cliff (Start a rEVOLution, grow a garden)
User avatar
careinke
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Mon 01 Jan 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 05:07:20

8) It will be interesting to say the least. With a 48 -52 split in the senate any veto by President Obama will be upheld so a Republican dominated house might as well not pass a lot of far right pipe dreams. It will just be a waste of time. Even on must- have bills compromises will have to be reached or they will get to relearn the lesson Newt learned about shutting down the government. I wonder if their is a new Monica waiting in the intern pool?
I cant' wait to start counting the votes tonight, not that Vermont is in play for anything other then Governor.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Mesuge » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 07:02:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', ' ')I am positive about the outcome, but I realize that it takes a large number of people to suffer negative consequences before they are open to learn and vote for the sort of things that will start the process of transition.


Bingo, there won't be any meanigfull change before reaching the dark bottom.
So, in this light I don't understand why Six is still voting for Dems, when he listed here their major sins numerous times, it's like some sort of masochism and delusional thinking, you are only prolonging the pain for yourself and others as well. Let's have the system crash, only then you can have a real political system reform. So, vote republican or abstein, that will speed up the process some..
User avatar
Mesuge
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1500
Joined: Tue 01 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Euro high horse bastard on the run
Top

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby Ludi » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 07:34:32

Seems pretty damn evil to want to strip people of their rights and protections just to "get it over faster." All very well and fine if it isn't your rights that are going to be destroyed. You have nothing to lose (I guess) so you don't care if anyone else has.
Ludi
 

Re: Democrats brace for the worst; could lose 70 seats in Ho

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Tue 02 Nov 2010, 08:12:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', '8')) It will be interesting to say the least. With a 48 -52 split in the senate any veto by President Obama will be upheld so a Republican dominated house might as well not pass a lot of far right pipe dreams. It will just be a waste of time.

And that is an optimal situation.
It will accelerate collapse of unsustainable system, perhaps help to push it over tipping point faster.

Current system is beyond any hope of repair.
Keeping it on artificial life support is masochism.

So lets induce political paralysis to speed up its euthanasia.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron