$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Permanently_Baffled', 'I') am confused.
Going back to Aarons point, can you clarify something for me please Lorenzo?

Was the energy profit calculated on the return of 5,000 barrels per acre or 200,000 barrels per acre?
In other words if they put x barrels of energy inputs in and they calculated the profit on getting 200,000 back (when they in fact only got 5,000), then surely that means that they DID NOT get a 540% return in energy invested?
Or was the 5000 barrels produced at a 540% energy proft? (ie it took less than a 1000 barrels of energy equivelant to produce?)
Please someone clarify

5000 isn't bad, but it sure puts the 540% statistic into perspective doesn't it?
Also frames Lorenzo's fierce defense of this marginal technology reinforcing not just his lack of credibility, but his willingness to deceive to serve his agenda.
At least he's consistent.