by KevO » Sun 29 Jul 2007, 04:37:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('KevO', 'h')ey guys 'm with you all the way and Matt, LATOC is for most people THE wake up site, but somebody please debunk this debunking...if only for the record!

Ok, here's a bit from a ppt program of mine.
ANWR: How much oil is there?95% Probability 5.7 bbls = .5 mbpd
Mean (Expected)10.3 bbls = .9 mbpd
5% Probability 16.0 bbls = 1.9 mbpd
Seven to 12 years are estimated to be required from the time of approval to explore and develop ANWR to the first production of oil.
From first production to peak will take 3 to 4 more years where the production rate peaks at .9 million barrels per day.
7-12 years to explore and develop
2025 ANWR produces .9 mbpd of oil
By 2025, the US is projected to consume 30 mbpd at a 1.7% annual growth rate.
In 2025, .9 mbpd is 20% of domestic production but only 3% of US demand.
30 mbpd divided by 24 hours = 1.25mbph
EIA, best case scenario would reduce oil prices by $.30 to $.50 per barrel
Reduce oil imports from 68% to 65%.
.9 mbpd is 72% of one daily hour US demand
Conclusion: ANWR would power the US for 43 minutes/day, the rest would have to be imported.
Not too mention, how would you get that oil down here if you could increase production beyond the .9 mbpd?
The pipeline only holds 2 mbpd and it is half full now with current production.
Nice one Monte. Thanks. I'll pass these replies (this thread link) on to where the query came from (A Transition Town group in the UK).
Also I think August will be key month as to whether TS is about to fly off TF blades.