Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby Sixstrings » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 18:02:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'N')o where in there is the expectation of government intervention. If that seems sarcastic to you I am sorry.


Yeah but snow piled high all over a big city is different. Government HAS to clear the streets.. without fresh supplies, a city starves within days. That's been true for centuries. There are a few basic things that must always be the function of city government because they're so important.. like fire fighting, police, sanitation, water, and getting the snow off the streets. Those are requirements for survival, everything else is optional.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby vision-master » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 18:04:09

Some towns in Scandinavia are linked togather by ski trails.
vision-master
 

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 18:55:14

8) If you live in the snow belt and want to be independent you set up your well insulated house with enough supplies to get you through any storm or period when the roads are out. If you heat with oil or propane you get a tank that holds enough fuel for the entire heating season. 2000 gallon tanks are common. If you heat with wood you have your full winters supply (six to ten cord) on hand before November first and many keep at least half of the next years on hand drying out just in case. If your furnace needs electricity to run the burner and fans then you put in a wood stove back up or a backup generator to make sure you can keep the house above freezing even at 40 below. You have your own snow shovels or snow blower and know how to use them and perhaps even an old four wheel drive truck with a plow on it to clear the drive.
If you don't mind being dependant on others you hire someone to plow the drive and have a smaller fuel tank that gets filled at least once a month but you don't let that get below a third full at any time unless your out of work and broke.
Just like you tell a teenager when they learn to drive. "you can run just as far and as cheap on the top half of the gas tank as you can on the bottom half and using just the top half means you never have to walk home." Of course they don't listen until they run out of gas some winter night and have to walk home at thirty below zero F. They also learn to keep there boots ,coat ,gloves and hat in the trunk all winter no matter how dressy the affair they are going to.
I have to wonder about New York. How many unemployed men are there in the city? Pass them out snow shovels or dust pans or hub caps and put them to work in gangs of twenty.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby vision-master » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 18:57:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow many unemployed men are there in the city? Pass them out snow shovels or dust pans or hub caps and put them to work in gangs of twenty.


They would all end up in the ER. :lol:

Image
vision-master
 

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 19:14:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Serial_Worrier', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Cloud9', 'I')n a libertarian paradise you would have no expectation that the state would be running to your personal aid. You would have a couple of weeks of food and fuel on hand, gortex clothing for when the heat goes off, and one of your vehicles would be a four wheeled drive. More than that, you would have more money to buy these things because your taxes wouldn’t be siphoned off to agencies that have been more interested in the new carpets in their office and their pension funds than looking after you.
Blah-blah-blah-blah

So instead of trying to refute his points, you just ridicule.
Bite me. It's fun.
But I've pretty much always made fun of people who need a 4x4 and a Banana Republic safari outfit to go pick up a pint of half and half at the Seven Eleven, and I find the arguement that being self suffiient means sitting at the top of the global consumption pyramid in an SUV kept in reserve for rainy days, well, unpersuasive.
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 19:19:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'B')ite me. It's fun.
But I've pretty much always made fun of people who need a 4x4 and a Banana Republic safari outfit to go pick up a pint of half and half at the Seven Eleven, and I find the arguement that being self suffiient means sitting at the top of the global consumption pyramid in an SUV kept in reserve for rainy days, well, unpersuasive.


So if a conservative does not fit any of those stereotypes is he free of your ridicule?
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby pup55 » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 19:50:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')overnment HAS to clear the streets.. without fresh supplies, a city starves within days. That's been true for centuries. There are a few basic things that must always be the function of city government because they're so important.. like fire fighting, police, sanitation, water, and getting the snow off the streets.


Pedantic... is that a word? Arguing one side of a point just because you can? Let me be so for a moment...


There was an incidence not too long ago about some rethinking on this.... Was there not a fire department in Jersey who basically let some guy's house burn down (keeping it from spreading) because the homeowner was a mooch and did not pay his fire protection assessment?

police, well, there are already private security services in some places that do the former job of the cops, namely protecting your stuff....water? Who says it's the government's job to provide you water?

So, to continue with the thought experiment....

Why not just make the individual homeowners or landowners on either side of the street be responsible for contracting their own snow removal? What is the barrier to doing this? Well the idea is, ostensibly, the city can do it more efficiently and effectively, because there will always be mooches that choose not to move their snow....and the city can afford big pieces of equipment that move it.... Is it not true that taxpayers are being asked to subsidize people who have a lot of highway frontage? People being forced, at the point of a gun, to give money to keep the streets free of snow?

Maybe I like snow, and would prefer to keep the tax money in my pocket and watch how beautiful it is in the front of the house...

So, let us now think about that thread on PO.com the other day on welfare....

you can see where I am going with this: How do you decide when a function is so important that it constitutes an acceptable government service, and sufficiently promotes the "common good" and when it doesn't, as in the case of welfare, at least in the opinion of the creators of that video? Where do you draw the line? Is it not true that there are valid public benefits and reasons not to have 33 percent of the kids in the country starving in the streets? Possibly so, because some people are mooches or not able to clean their own street, and some people are mooches and not able to take care of the kids they pop out....

There is a fine line between "good" government functions and "bad", and it depends largely on who you are, which side of the transaction you are on, and who benefits.....
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 20:11:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Serial_Worrier', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'B')ite me. It's fun.
But I've pretty much always made fun of people who need a 4x4 and a Banana Republic safari outfit to go pick up a pint of half and half at the Seven Eleven, and I find the arguement that being self suffiient means sitting at the top of the global consumption pyramid in an SUV kept in reserve for rainy days, well, unpersuasive.

So if a conservative does not fit any of those stereotypes is he free of your ridicule?

Short answer, no, but how would I know or care if they are conservative?
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby mattduke » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 20:27:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'W')elcome to Libertarian paradise.

What? Libertarian paradise? Did I miss something? What we have is a total failure of a socialized snow removal service. If that "service" (or in this case lack thereof) wasn't administered by the State, then people would simply have agreements with the snow removal company. Simple. Of course there are not many such companies precisely because the State has destroyed that market. How is an example of a total failure of socialized snow removal somehow turned into a shortcoming of free society itself? This is the most bizarre argument I've read on this board in a long time, and I've read quite a few here!
User avatar
mattduke
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby ColossalContrarian » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 20:43:53

I live in the "snow belt" and everyone around here knows what to do to get through a few days of isolation. I don't think this has anything to do with being a "survivalist" but more experience. When you live in a part of the world that has snow storms you know how to prepare for them. If I lived in the GOM area or East Coast I'd have knowledge of getting through storms and hurricanes but if I were put in that situation now I'd be SOL.


The topic of this thread is very good in that we can see how people are so unprepared though. What do you do when you're travelling? You could be prep'd to the gills at home but what about when you're away?
ColossalContrarian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1374
Joined: Tue 20 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby Oneaboveall » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 22:18:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', 'T')here was an incidence not too long ago about some rethinking on this.... Was there not a fire department in Jersey who basically let some guy's house burn down (keeping it from spreading) because the homeowner was a mooch and did not pay his fire protection assessment?

That was NOT Jersey.
When the banksters want something, our policymakers move with the speed of Mercury and the determination of Ares. It’s only when the rest of us need something that there is paralysis.

How free are we today with the dominance of globalist capital and militarized security apparatus?
Oneaboveall
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Mon 01 Nov 2010, 17:56:45
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby Serial_Worrier » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 22:20:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'W')elcome to Libertarian paradise.

What? Libertarian paradise? Did I miss something? What we have is a total failure of a socialized snow removal service. If that "service" (or in this case lack thereof) wasn't administered by the State, then people would simply have agreements with the snow removal company. Simple. Of course there are not many such companies precisely because the State has destroyed that market. How is an example of a total failure of socialized snow removal somehow turned into a shortcoming of free society itself? This is the most bizarre argument I've read on this board in a long time, and I've read quite a few here!


It's like trying to argue with turd-slinging monkeys on this site. Have fun! :razz:
User avatar
Serial_Worrier
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby PrestonSturges » Wed 29 Dec 2010, 23:27:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Serial_Worrier', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mattduke', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PrestonSturges', 'W')elcome to Libertarian paradise.

What? Libertarian paradise? Did I miss something? What we have is a total failure of a socialized snow removal service. If that "service" (or in this case lack thereof) wasn't administered by the State, then people would simply have agreements with the snow removal company. Simple. Of course there are not many such companies precisely because the State has destroyed that market. How is an example of a total failure of socialized snow removal somehow turned into a shortcoming of free society itself? This is the most bizarre argument I've read on this board in a long time, and I've read quite a few here!

It's like trying to argue with turd-slinging monkeys on this site. Have fun! :razz:
I guess that would be the private civil defense industry that comes fully equipped to deal with forest fire, blizzards, floods, earthquakes, and oil spills. Yeah it sounds stupid when I say it, because business plans don't depend on business that may or may not materialize over several years, and they don't develop new technologies for hypothetical problems like oil spills.

How much of their National Guard is in Iraq?
User avatar
PrestonSturges
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6052
Joined: Wed 15 Oct 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby bratticus » Thu 30 Dec 2010, 00:09:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Millions Die Due to Inaction By `Overwhelmed' New York City's Emergency Response

New York City’s emergency system was “overwhelmed” by the Dec. 26 blizzard ... The city’s 911 emergency-response system received 49,478 calls on Dec. 27, the sixth-largest number ever (click here for more)
User avatar
bratticus
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 2368
Joined: Thu 12 Jun 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Bratislava
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby pup55 » Thu 30 Dec 2010, 00:23:13

My bad, you are quite correct, it was Tennessee for pete's sake....
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Firefighters in rural Tennessee let a home burn to the ground last week because the homeowner hadn’t paid a $75 fee.

Gene Cranick of Obion County and his family lost all of their possessions in the Sept. 29 fire, along with three dogs and a cat.

“They could have been saved if they had put water on it, but they didn’t do it,” Cranick told MSNBC’s Keith Olbermann.


http://newsone.com/nation/cedricthornton/tennessee-firefighters-let-home-burn-because-of-unpaid-bill/
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby Koyaanisqatsi » Thu 30 Dec 2010, 04:22:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hinterlander', 'N')ovus, Is there a link or two that you could provide for that info? I agree, this story feels rather ominous I would like to read more about it.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')any municipalities were struggling to finish plowing local streets in time for this morning’s commute. Residents in several towns reported their neighborhoods were still snow covered late Monday.

Albert Grassi, a 30-year resident of Orange, said he had only seen one municipal plow pass through snow-covered Washington Street by late afternoon.

"It’s a disgrace," Grassi said. "One plow in the last 12 hours — it’s ludicrous."

In Brick, broken down snowplows and abandoned vehicles blocking streets meant some areas were still covered in six-foot-high snow drifts and emergency vehicles could not reach 911 calls.

"Our cars can’t get down the street — so we are walking into them," said Lt. Frank Docherty, a spokesman for Brick Township police.


Be sure to check out the time-lapse video at the bottom:
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/1 ... rom_e.html

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')r Bloomberg said that the city's emergency responders, whom he called the finest in the world, were overwhelmed during the blizzard, leaving many needy people without help.

On Monday, the 911 emergency phone line received almost 50,000 calls - the sixth highest number in 911's history.

The New York Times reported that over 200 ambulances had become stuck in streets left unploughed or blocked by abandoned cars.

Paramedics had to carry stretchers long distances, climbing over piles of snow, to reach sick residents.

The New York Times also reported that one woman with stroke symptoms waited six hours for a response, by which stage she was unresponsive, and a woman in labour waited over nine hours for help. By then, it was too late to save her baby.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-12090575
User avatar
Koyaanisqatsi
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon 17 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Pacific NW
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby Quinny » Thu 30 Dec 2010, 07:21:43

It just makes sense to collectively organise some services. Imagine the accidents & crime driving throught neighbourhoods where some people decide not to pay for the streetlamp outside their house and decide they don't want to grit their bit of pavement. The management costs, time and organisation of piecemeal services like that are massive.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')overnment HAS to clear the streets.. without fresh supplies, a city starves within days. That's been true for centuries. There are a few basic things that must always be the function of city government because they're so important.. like fire fighting, police, sanitation, water, and getting the snow off the streets.


Pedantic... is that a word? Arguing one side of a point just because you can? Let me be so for a moment...


There was an incidence not too long ago about some rethinking on this.... Was there not a fire department in Jersey who basically let some guy's house burn down (keeping it from spreading) because the homeowner was a mooch and did not pay his fire protection assessment?

police, well, there are already private security services in some places that do the former job of the cops, namely protecting your stuff....water? Who says it's the government's job to provide you water?

So, to continue with the thought experiment....

Why not just make the individual homeowners or landowners on either side of the street be responsible for contracting their own snow removal? What is the barrier to doing this? Well the idea is, ostensibly, the city can do it more efficiently and effectively, because there will always be mooches that choose not to move their snow....and the city can afford big pieces of equipment that move it.... Is it not true that taxpayers are being asked to subsidize people who have a lot of highway frontage? People being forced, at the point of a gun, to give money to keep the streets free of snow?

Maybe I like snow, and would prefer to keep the tax money in my pocket and watch how beautiful it is in the front of the house...

So, let us now think about that thread on PO.com the other day on welfare....

you can see where I am going with this: How do you decide when a function is so important that it constitutes an acceptable government service, and sufficiently promotes the "common good" and when it doesn't, as in the case of welfare, at least in the opinion of the creators of that video? Where do you draw the line? Is it not true that there are valid public benefits and reasons not to have 33 percent of the kids in the country starving in the streets? Possibly so, because some people are mooches or not able to clean their own street, and some people are mooches and not able to take care of the kids they pop out....

There is a fine line between "good" government functions and "bad", and it depends largely on who you are, which side of the transaction you are on, and who benefits.....
Live, Love, Learn, Leave Legacy.....oh and have a Laugh while you're doing it!
User avatar
Quinny
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Thu 03 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby dinopello » Thu 30 Dec 2010, 09:12:29

The extensive network of roads that need to be cleared of snow only exist due to huge government subsidies of the transportation infrastructure. If all transportation was privately funded we would have more compact communities where people walked and they would be connected to each other by trains. This is a more efficient arrangement and one the market would and will choose as the unsustainability of government subsidies of public roads becomes more acute. Snow removal is an extraordinary event - eventually it will be general repair and maintenance that can't be afforded on a large enough scale for the road network to become largely degraded for automobile travel. If your town is not walkable and does not have a rail or shipping infrastructure, I would move.

Even with communities where people walk, you need to do some clearing of snow. But the scale is small enough that it is manageable. Here, the government has a snow blower loan program. Neighborhoods organize thenself to clear the sidewalks in their community with volunteers assisted with the equipment they borrow from the county. Not sure this is sustainable either, but the practice has built up local organizations (or taken advantage of organization already in place) that take responsibility for making their community function.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Thu 30 Dec 2010, 09:36:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'T')he extensive network of roads that need to be cleared of snow only exist due to huge government subsidies of the transportation infrastructure. If all transportation was privately funded we would have more compact communities where people walked and they would be connected to each other by trains.

:o Where was a rail line ever built with private funds? Never happened and never will as the first thing you need is the Right of Way which you cannot get from point A to point B without the governments power of eminent domain. All forms of transportation are subsidized by one means or the other and the growth or decline of one form vs.another can be controlled by varying the amount of subsidy.For example raising the gas tax in the US so that gas cost above $5 per gallon would increase the demand for commuter rail and existing lines could be put back into passenger service as soon as the newly willing riders started showing up at the station. Make it $10/gallon and public demand for new rail lines serving suburbs would rise and politicians would win elections by promising to deliver them.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Partial societial breakdown 3 days after blizzard.

Unread postby deMolay » Thu 30 Dec 2010, 10:05:48

Looks like the slow snow cleanup by Unionized Thugs in NYC was a budget protest action by the Union. Socialized Snow Removal at work. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/sani ... OJlekSSDJK
"We Are All Travellers, From The Sweet Grass To The Packing House, From Birth To Death, We Wander Between The Two Eternities". An Old Cowboy.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron