by kpeavey » Sat 08 Dec 2007, 18:26:03
Thomas Jefferson Wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
and, in another document, wrote"
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'w')hen a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, ...
What Jefferson refers to as the Laws of Nature supercede those of a government, ANY government. All governments exist by the will and tolerance of the people governed. If a government becomes intolerable, it will be cast off by the people. Unfortunately, there are governments that make it difficult for the people to do so.
---
vision-master wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')ost young people don't have shit these days
When I was young I had nothing. That includes work experience, job skills, living skills, networking relationships with associates, credit history, and references. Nothing has changed.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--for ever."
-George Orwell, 1984
_____
twenty centuries of stony sleep were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle, and what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
-George Yeats
by seahorse » Sat 08 Dec 2007, 21:38:46
Fishman wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')eahorse, get a real job.
No thanks. I'd rather have a job where I'm allowed to think and use my head for something other than a hat rack.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ush has assumed far fewer powers than most presidents in times past.
When you decide to start reading, you might realize that the expansion of executive powers is not limited to this "war on terror", but also includes the unconstitutional use of Presidential signing statements.
ABA Report on Presidential Signing Statements
Further, it is not only the Executive which has broken down, but the Legislature which has completely abrogated any of its responsibilities under the Constitution.
One thing I agree with the conservative talk radio hosts on is that people need to go all the way back to the Framer's intentions, and Kpeavey gave us a good starting point with Thomas Jefferson, but remember, he didn't have a real job, he was only a thinker and a writer.
by kpeavey » Sun 09 Dec 2007, 09:54:57
Seahorse Wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')homas Jefferson, but remember, he didn't have a real job, he was only a thinker and a writer.
Jefferson was involved in raising crops, and a multitude of endeavors, but made most of his money from making and selling NAILS. His slaves performed the work.
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--for ever."
-George Orwell, 1984
_____
twenty centuries of stony sleep were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle, and what rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
-George Yeats
-

kpeavey
- Expert

-
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
-
by denverdave » Sun 09 Dec 2007, 13:13:56
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'w')e have teeth and not only the right, but the obligation to bite
.
I am all for biting someone, but from a practical standpoint, who would it be?
That is a good question I have been mulling over lately, and a great post. Because of globalization, the intitutions that shape our world don't have a tangible, local presence as much anymore. The place to "bite" seems to be diffused into everything we do or buy. The best thing I can come up with is to try to withdraw from consumer culture as much as possible and build alternatives to it.
'If a ruler hearkens to lies, all his officials become wicked.'
by seahorse » Sun 09 Dec 2007, 14:44:36
Kingcoal wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')re we saying that Congress and the President are violating the Constitution and the Judicial Branch doesn't care? No law that Congress writes and the President enforces is real until it is tested in court and that includes executive orders.
Oh I get it, you mean nothing is real until the Supreme Court rubber stamps it? For surely you do not mean we aren't really fighting in Iraq right now. Surely you don't disagree with the ABA report that the President's isn't really doing signing statements? Surely, you don't contest that the President is really doing domestic spying? That Congress really didn't pass a B.S. Patriot Act which allows the FBI to get personal records, including records of attorney/client privilege, without a warrant? Are you contesting these things aren't real? CIA destroying tapes? Bush admin destroying emails and other documents required by law to be maintained? Cheney refusing to turn over executive documents required to be maintained? You mean these things didn't happen. Thank God, it was all a 7 year long nightmare. If you are waiting for the Courts to stop these practices, don't hold your breath.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')WB has already been slapped on the wrist at least once by the court. I want to hear specific examples where people have been harmed by unauthorized use of power and courts have upheld it.
Yeah, that slap on the wrist really got his attention. That's why their still destroying interrogation tapes.
You make my point which is this, instead of seeing reality, you see a Constitution which prohibits these unlawful practices, or at least attempts to by setting up a system of checks and balances. Unfortunately, the reality is the system is broken. Its no longer working. Power cannot be limited by a set of ideas reduced to writing. Gov't power is only limited by the will of the people to limit it. So, if you keep waiting for the gov't to limit itself, it will not happen. As long as you continue to view what is happening through the rose colored glasses of our Constitutional, you will not see reality.
The reality is we have become fascist. Check out these concerns expressed by VP Wallace during WWII:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')The really dangerous American fascist,” Wallace wrote, “… is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power.”
In his strongest indictment of the tide of fascism he saw rising in America, Wallace added, “They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective toward which all their deceit is directed is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection.” By these standards, a few of today’s weapons for keeping the common people in eternal subjection include NAFTA, the World Trade Organization, union-busting, cutting worker benefits while increasing CEO pay, elimination of worker benefits, security and pensions, rapacious credit card interest, and outsourcing of jobs — not to mention the largest prison system in the world.
Information ClearinghousePresident Eisenhower, in his farewell address, also warned Americans to be ware of facism, stating that the biggest threat to American Democracy was the rise of the "military-industrial complex." This is a quote from his farewell address:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction...
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.