Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

I want a dog.

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 13 Nov 2006, 18:19:46

If these are scientific peer review journals, Whippet, and you incorporate the concept of neoteny in your article, you're going to get creamed by your peers. You haven't shown a true understanding of the concept, just your own interpretation, based on a cursory glance at the subject. If you think that's adequate, and you have gathered enough evidence, in other areas to support your hypothesis, then bravo. Good luck!


MERCURYgirl--Sorry about your cat dying. When I was free-flying my cockatoo, I had a highly detailed dream about a goshawk pursuing him. I decided not to fly him for a couple of days, as a result of the dream. The dream actually unfolded 2 days later with a goshawk doing the exact same maneuvers right outside my front window, as in my dream, but in pursuit of a crow, rather than my cockatoo. I got the distinct impression that had my bird been flying around, he would have been the likely target. The white birds always get nailed first.

I dreamed about my dog falling to his death, and just barely saved him from doing so, a short time later, as well.

So I can easily credit your story of sensing your pet's demise, or of your cat's ability to signal this and you to recieve the signal. What book were you reading at the time, if you don't mind me asking.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby WildRose » Mon 13 Nov 2006, 19:06:28

A husky-shepherd cross we had a number of years ago signalled to us that his demise was near with his behavior. It was a cold February, and we knew he was ill with an autoimmune blood disorder which would have required regular, expensive blood transfusions to buy him more time. What he did for about a week before his death was ask to be let outside, then he'd go out and curl up in a ball in the snow and we'd have a heck of a time getting him back inside, to the point where near the end I'd literally drag him in. Then, finally, he went out one last time and we found him on the back step a few minutes later, having died from shock.
User avatar
WildRose
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby mercurygirl » Mon 13 Nov 2006, 19:07:14

Threadbear, I'm sorry, I don't remember the name of the book, 15 years have passed. Perhaps a library book. I read everything that comes within reach. But it was quite an odd experience, so I remember that part of it. I conclude that the reading immersion helped me be "mindful" or "in the now" in some way. I have periodic extrasensory abilities and I think lots of others do too. But I distinctly remember it as if she "told" me.
Those are some wild dreams you had! It really makes you wonder, doesn't it?
mercurygirl
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby threadbear » Mon 13 Nov 2006, 19:50:55

Wild Rose, That's a sad but interesting story. It reminds me of the story of the old eskimo leaving his village and lying down on the ice to die. If he was an old dog, they can become disoriented, a bit like old people and just not know what they are doing or where they are. But your dog appears to have wanted to die, for sure.

Mercurygirl, "Gifted" with a sixth sense, are you? It's a curse as much as a blessing, isn't it?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby WildRose » Mon 13 Nov 2006, 19:56:53

Hi, Threadbear. He was eight years old, which apparently is getting "up there" for a large dog, but not really old. I think he was really preparing to die.

The dog I currently have, a Shepherd, is 15 years old and definitely has some dementia! My kids have been quite perplexed with her behavior of late.
User avatar
WildRose
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Tue 14 Nov 2006, 17:44:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'I')f these are scientific peer review journals, Whippet, and you incorporate the concept of neoteny in your article, you're going to get creamed by your peers. You haven't shown a true understanding of the concept, just your own interpretation, based on a cursory glance at the subject. If you think that's adequate, and you have gathered enough evidence, in other areas to support your hypothesis, then bravo. Good luck!


You must have missed my sarcasm: :roll: As far as neotany goes, it matters little to my argument. I think my understanding of neotany is sufficient in that I can integrate it into my conclusions about human pet ownership. Gould can kiss my ass, and my peers, if I have any, can do so as well.

Neotany: a hypothesis about primate development and socialization, largely self-explanatory. Big brained people might have spent their entire lives proving this simplistic concept, just to get their names placed in the canon of great anthropological achievement, but I could care less. When I was a student of Physical Anthropology, I produced my own theories on the origins of bipedal locomotion that were dismissed as simply "interesting theories", only later "proven" to be "true" by someone with a far higher Wonk quotient than I. Fine.

Frequently, I have found that the modern "professional" intellectual is lacking in simple curiosity, and over-reliant on methodology and process and too focused on their discipline ahead of philosophical considerations. They seem to forget there are other ways of knowing things, or they restrict their thinking simply for the sake of efficiency, or a belief that the intellectual sphere will serve its own needs by drawing together various fields of inquiry in forming new interesting insights. But whatever.

Anthropology, in particular, I've noticed, is full of a bunch of stuffed-shirts. Probably something to do with the lack of positions available for all those fossil-polishers and missing-link finders. Only the biggest, most simple-minded nerds get the big paycheck positions and the notoreity of publication. The rest inflict mental damage on college students. I remember my instructor, he came to class dressed like Indiana Jones complete with fedora and suede leather bomber jacket. Sweet. I always kind of considered the class to be fairly lightweight. Something about sitting in a room being lectured at about the technicalities and theories of primate-hood while being a primate struck me as kind of absurd... a discipline in which you can waste tons of time coming to conclusions that even a child can recognize. Being shown video of primate groups socializing, and a couple of videos of Koko, and you have everything you need to understand about anthropology that is useful and applicable, unless you want to work in Creation Sciences or a Zoo.

The supreme pleasure of philosophy is that you rely on logic and reason to reach conclusion and gain insight, instead of the insular world of a bunch of "experts" and their cronies and publications. Peer review, my ass.

I can only think of one instance where an expert echoed my theories about pet ownership, but I didn't read his stuff and just heard it in passing. You could probably look up his theories on the Google. I recall that he characterized the pet-owner relationship as "parasitic". I'll bet his career didn't go anywhere after that, but you never know, he might have been paid money to research and form that hypothesis. Maybe my theories share a certain sympathy, I don't know. If he's a big shot anthropologist with credentials, maybe you'll have an easier time of digesting his theories.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby threadbear » Tue 14 Nov 2006, 17:57:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BlisteredWhippet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'I')f these are scientific peer review journals, Whippet, and you incorporate the concept of neoteny in your article, you're going to get creamed by your peers. You haven't shown a true understanding of the concept, just your own interpretation, based on a cursory glance at the subject. If you think that's adequate, and you have gathered enough evidence, in other areas to support your hypothesis, then bravo. Good luck!




Frequently, I have found that the modern "professional" intellectual is lacking in simple curiosity, and over-reliant on methodology and process and too focused on their discipline ahead of philosophical considerations. They seem to forget there are other ways of knowing things, or they restrict their thinking simply for the sake of efficiency, or a belief that the intellectual sphere will serve its own needs by drawing together various fields of inquiry in forming new interesting insights. But whatever.



Seeing as that is the case I wonder what you think of the idea that other civilizations from elsewhere in the universe are visiting Earth. And I'm not being sarcastic. Seeing as it's a subject that has been cartooned and caricatured, to death, let's see if you can talk about it, without pathologizing me, or similarly reducing me to a cartoon. How open minded are you?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Wed 15 Nov 2006, 17:26:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')Seeing as that is the case I wonder what you think of the idea that other civilizations from elsewhere in the universe are visiting Earth. And I'm not being sarcastic. Seeing as it's a subject that has been cartooned and caricatured, to death, let's see if you can talk about it, without pathologizing me, or similarly reducing me to a cartoon. How open minded are you?


Let me guess, you hold the belief that we are descended from space travellers from the Sirius (Dog star) system who crash-landed here eons ago and found the women comely and the atmosphere agreeable? J/k.

I do not think that alien lifeforms "visiting" Earth is outside the realm of possibility. Certainly there is some evidence that it is possible, if not probable that alien, inorganic and possible organic life travelled through space freeze-dried on an asteroid.

But I remain skeptical as far as its application to human experience. I have heard it argued, for instance, by otherwise rather intelligent people, that alien life must have interceded with our primate anscestor to create homo sapiens sapiens. The scenario is imaginative but irrelevant to the natural development of our species. Is our large brain any more miraculous than the intricate folds of permeable breathing membrane on the top of a Saimese Fighting Fish's head? These arguments, to me, don't hold much water in the absence of any real evidence. For one thing, they are not necessary to explain human evolution.

I see these types of arguments as motivated by a doctrine of partiality or exceptionalism, i.e. "We" are too special to simply have evolved from nature, not from a real scientific or philosophical basis, at least not a defensible one. If you have a personal experience I will not try to talk you out of a belief, unless you argue that I remove my very well thought out theory of natural human evolution for the substitute reality that I am evolved from space monkeys instead.

As for random alien encounters and other such phenomena, I regard them as possibilities, but so what? How is it relevant to anyone's experience of life? Even if alien life (is or was) visiting Earth, the contact remains effable, ephemeral, largely devoid of larger meaning. Until there is an experience which transcends a shadow of doubt, it remains in the realm of myth and mesmerization. Look at the flocks of Christians worshipping at tearing Madonnas or the face of Jesus in a rainbow oil patch or in the clouds or whatever. The human mind is completely capable of fooling itself, and groups of people are known to enhance this effect for each other. So yeah, it is a poor subject to bring to the table if your intention is for me to take you seriously. I don't particularly find Jesus tortillas or alien sightings interesting for similar reasons, but I do find alien sightings categorically more possible than religious ones, which still isn't saying much.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby threadbear » Wed 15 Nov 2006, 18:09:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BlisteredWhippet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')Seeing as that is the case I wonder what you think of the idea that other civilizations from elsewhere in the universe are visiting Earth. And I'm not being sarcastic. Seeing as it's a subject that has been cartooned and caricatured, to death, let's see if you can talk about it, without pathologizing me, or similarly reducing me to a cartoon. How open minded are you?


Let me guess, you hold the belief that we are descended from space travellers from the Sirius (Dog star) system who crash-landed here eons ago and found the women comely and the atmosphere agreeable? J/k.



You reduce me to a cartoon, right off the bat. That's a common reaction from the army of iconoclasts who think they're unique. In fact, academia churns them out like so many sausage links.

You too can be the subject of a silly symphonies rendition with very little effort. And no, I don't "believe" much of anything, but do have the ability to entertain theories that may appear superficially outlandish. It's only upon closer examination that certain ideas or theories can be seen to be possible, even likely.

Much of this thread, you have spent lambasting those who identify with animals, as anthropomorphizing silly twits. Then you quickly reverse course and admonish those who think human evolution may be slightly different from the evolutionary process of wild animals.

I have actually tried to point you in the right direction by having you observe that neotenization happens in wolves when they come into close association with man. The same neonatinazation process seems to happen to apes who come into close association, with a more advanced species. The neotenized wolves become dogs. The neotenized apes become people.

My question is--who is the more advanced species we have come into contact with, that has effected our development?

It's far from an open and shut case, but it should definitely be looked at.

Most academics can be relied upon to skirt any issue and ridicule any person who would have them take up common cause or interest that they associate with the denizens of trailer parks. I spent a couple of years helping to research the topic of govt/media propaganda so understand it quite well.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Thu 16 Nov 2006, 17:40:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BlisteredWhippet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')Seeing as that is the case I wonder what you think of the idea that other civilizations from elsewhere in the universe are visiting Earth. And I'm not being sarcastic. Seeing as it's a subject that has been cartooned and caricatured, to death, let's see if you can talk about it, without pathologizing me, or similarly reducing me to a cartoon. How open minded are you?


Let me guess, you hold the belief that we are descended from space travellers from the Sirius (Dog star) system who crash-landed here eons ago and found the women comely and the atmosphere agreeable? J/k.



$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')You reduce me to a cartoon, right off the bat. That's a common reaction from the army of iconoclasts who think they're unique. In fact, academia churns them out like so many sausage links.


I am simply relying on my own experience with alien origin theory by citing my experience. Its not my fault that such theories have an exceedingly bad name. I can play "what if" all day long and be entertained, but it is hardly relevant. If I want to indulge in fantasy and speculation I'll dig up my 20-sided die from High school and go to town Gary Gygax style.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')You too can be the subject of a silly symphonies rendition with very little effort. And no, I don't "believe" much of anything, but do have the ability to entertain theories that may appear superficially outlandish. It's only upon closer examination that certain ideas or theories can be seen to be possible, even likely.


You are asking me if I am open-minded enough to consider far-flung theories about alien involvement in human evolution, yes or no? I will accompany you to left field as long as you pretend not to be patronized by my patronage.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Much of this thread, you have spent lambasting those who identify with animals, as anthropomorphizing silly twits. Then you quickly reverse course and admonish those who think human evolution may be slightly different from the evolutionary process of wild animals.


I think you'll find yourself hard pressed to qualify these accusations with actual quotes by myself in context. I do not think anthropomorphizing is something only twits do. Its something we all do, like lying, and like lying, it can be problematic. That is all.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
') I have actually tried to point you in the right direction by having you observe that neotenization happens in wolves when they come into close association with man. The same neonatinazation process seems to happen to apes who come into close association, with a more advanced species. The neotenized wolves become dogs. The neotenized apes become people.

My question is--who is the more advanced species we have come into contact with, that has effected our development?

It's far from an open and shut case, but it should definitely be looked at.

Well, lets look at it. Here are your premises (assumptions):

Since other animals become neotanized through association with man, neotanized man must have become so after association with a "neotenizing force".

This is unfortunately of the same logical structure as the religious argument ascribing the power of prime mover to god, but lacks the ethereal, non-physical aspect to protect it from analysis.

Who neotanized the neotanizers?

Frankly, I don't think the alien theory (or the God theory) necessary to explain neoteny. There ARE examples in nature of wild animals raising the young of other species. Cuckoldry is expressed throughout the animal kingdom. Animals can be tricked into caring for the young of other animals: why? I think a good theory is a neotenous instinct: where the maternal (or paternal) instinct responds to cues like small, whiny, helpless, big-head/small-body, etc.

The plain fact is that in many instances, feeding the offspring of another animal is wasted energy and work. So the neotenous function is an override of typical biological signaling.

An animal puts a great deal of energy into reproduction and offspring. It only makes sense that the individual who puts more effort into this will get more of a reward, being more likely to successfully reproduce. Youth and its signals mean a greater likelihood of reproductive success. This dynamic shows me clearly that such an intrinsic, powerful process will result in high "neotenous" drive, leading to succeeding generations of individual genetics expressing those "youthful" characteristics.

Apes and Chimps, our cousins, along with their big brains, are prolific and very social. So I don't doubt that over millions of years they would produce a genome that expressed more and more neotany, since the connection between youth and reproductive success is a nearly universal axiom.

Neoteny is instinct, exploited when robins raise Stellar Jays. This instinct evolves into a whole suite of behaviors and physical attributes given a large brain, millions of years, and social development. So in the reptilian brain, we have the basic blueprint for neoteny. An evolved frontal cortex takes this and goes to town.

Aliens aren't necessary to explain neoteny in humans, or apes, or birds.

Certainly aliens may have come down and neotenized humans, but there is no evidence of such a thing. If aliens DID come down and neotenized us, they certainly had their work cut out for them.

Recent experiments by Russan canine breeders have isolated and documented breeding techniques that neotenize canines. They took a related yet wild species and were able to completely domesticate them by exploiting the existing neotenous quality inherent in the animal. Every generation, a cuddlier, sweeter, friendler, more baby-like was selectively bred.

Neoteny in humans exists today and is continually refined. But evidence for its rudimentary anscestor in the reptilian brain means that its existence probably predates our development by hundreds of millions of years. Neoteny is the blueprint under the suite of behaviors that makes men and women smile when they see a baby. Its a two-way street. The baby tends to smile back.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Most academics can be relied upon to skirt any issue and ridicule any person who would have them take up common cause or interest that they associate with the denizens of trailer parks. I spent a couple of years helping to research the topic of govt/media propaganda so understand it quite well.

Well, maybe this has something to do with neoteny as well. A well-fed, intelligent person probably doesn't live in a trailer park. People that live in trailer parks typically have anti-neotenous traits like poor physical health, squinty, pig-like eyes, and asses that look llike two pigs fighting under a blanket.

You can bet a symetrically-faced academic in a tweed jacket likes strolling into class each morning to gaze upon the shiny little faces, flushed with growth hormone each morning. I'm sure that the reptilian part of his brain would not be similarly satisfied by gazing upon the ossified visage of some trailer park scumbag whose mother was the sister of his uncle's son, his face resplendent with a cathode-ray tan from watching too much WWF.

I think females best represent the neotenous instinct expressed in the high, squeaky voice, the weak muscular structure and ample fatty tissue. Males represent the instinct for a voracious appetite for gazing upong the same, and totally falling over themselves to help a female.

Why have AAA when you can stand on the side of the road, bite your lip, and look troubled? This is neoteny.

Ultimately the benefits work out in predictable fashion: I just saw a piece on the news connecting youth and the viability of male sperm. Still, like anthropomorphism, neoteny is problematic. Not all evolved traits serve the greater good in the context of modern life. The news bit recognized that the effect of a potential father being older and wiser may offset the physical risks of having offspring much younger.

How many young people will now rush off to reproduce, spurred by that old evolutionary mainstay, fear? In an evolved society and culture, age and wisdom, I think make for better, more well-adjusted children. Yet evolution still believes that we are under environmental pressures like predation and starvation, so traits like neoteny remain powerfully expressed. Like anthropomorphism, neoteny is something that remains problematic for the individual, and problematic for society at large.

Nature isn't fair. I would much prefer that my mate by young, beautiful, AND wise. However, the latter comes with age. The only way I can see this problem be rectified is if we concentrated our efforts in turning out wise young men and women from primary education. Instead, we turn out mangled little idiots with no critical thinking or basic skills.

I think wisdom is what is lacking in education. Kids are taught a blizzard of abstractions as dates, facts, and trivia, 95% of which will be utterly forgotten. I don't believe kids are taught the basic tools for thinking. State education is an exercise in indoctrination into a system which discounts original thinking and exalts false virtue. It substitutes wisdom for errata.

But I digress.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 16 Nov 2006, 19:59:21

"Apes and Chimps, our cousins, along with their big brains, are prolific and very social. So I don't doubt that over millions of years they would produce a genome that expressed more and more neotany, since the connection between youth and reproductive success is a nearly universal axiom." Blistered Whippet.



Whether these features were intentionally engineered by a higher species or just arose out of a natural selection process because retention of these features conferred an advantage on the chimp, is a question. I simply find it interesting that dogs, the other neonate species, became that way, only through the wolve's association with man. Neoteny is the prominent feature of a pet.

It's possible that features like friendliness, and an innocent kind of fearlessness would be selected for, but not in the absense of a senior symbiotic mentor species (hey, I just invented a new name for pet owners) These same traits would prove just as much a liability otherwise.

The human as neonate ape issue, also completely clarifies the pelvic issues around bi-pedalism and the Leakey's Lucy. Lucy is clearly a hoax, worthy of Piltdown man fame. The skeletal structure of the infant ape has the pelvic structure of modern man. And indeed, if you have viewed a very young chimpanzee you can see that they walk upright with much more ease than their elders.

I think these ideas have merit and are worthy of study, but I'm not holding my breath, as academia is still, laboring under the weight of it's own assumptions.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Thu 16 Nov 2006, 21:18:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '"')Apes and Chimps, our cousins, along with their big brains, are prolific and very social. So I don't doubt that over millions of years they would produce a genome that expressed more and more neotany, since the connection between youth and reproductive success is a nearly universal axiom." Blistered Whippet.



Whether these features were intentionally engineered by a higher species or just arose out of a natural selection process because retention of these features conferred an advantage on the chimp, is a question. I simply find it interesting that dogs, the other neonate species, became that way, only through the wolve's association with man. Neoteny is the prominent feature of a pet.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')It's possible that features like friendliness, and an innocent kind of fearlessness would be selected for, but not in the absense of a senior symbiotic mentor species (hey, I just invented a new name for pet owners) These same traits would prove just as much a liability otherwise.


I'm not sure why it is necessary to have a mentor species to develop neoteny. Social groups of animals develop socially advantageous traits for the sake of individuals enhancing their own reproductive success. Dogs are cute, but they can also show their enormous teeth and make fearsome faces. Just because one trait was inbred does not mean the other traits are bred out of the animal. Evolution takes a long time, so consider the effect of lots of small changes.

Neoteny is relevant in terms of the social structure of a species. Friendliness is not a universal aspect of behavior, it is just one aspect. You can kick ass all day long and come home and be friendly to family and friends, right? Your dog can rip apart a tennis ball and growl at the neighbors and then lick your hand. Friendliness should have been a great boon when collaborating in social heirarchies.

This reminds me of the descended testicles theory as well. It would not seem descended testicles would have any evolutionary benefit, more like a net negative, yet perhaps it forced humans to develop more complicated fighting and living strategies to maintain the dangling equipment. Moreover, maybe the soft, wrinkly scrotum turned out to stoke a little neotenous kind of affection for the females since there is little vulnerability found in the typical muscular, utilitarian male body. The Neotenous loss of hair in various places might have spurred the development of clothing, tools, and so forth.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he human as neonate ape issue, also completely clarifies the pelvic issues around bi-pedalism and the Leakey's Lucy. Lucy is clearly a hoax, worthy of Piltdown man fame. The skeletal structure of the infant ape has the pelvic structure of modern man. And indeed, if you have viewed a very young chimpanzee you can see that they walk upright with much more ease than their elders.


True enough. Yet the symbiotic mentor species theory means that instead of some apes choosing to mate with these neonates, a third party came in to selectively breed them, which is bizarre. One, there is no proof of such a thing, and two, it is unnecessary to explain neoteny.

Perhaps the alien issue is an outgrowth of your own considerable predilection toward neotenous characteristics, seeing as how those little grey men are kind of cute and resemble babies? [smilie=binkybaby.gif]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')I think these ideas have merit and are worthy of study, but I'm not holding my breath, as academia is still, laboring under the weight of it's own assumptions.


Well, I believe they have produced a number of those theories. I respect the fact that science labors under the weight of its assumptions, though. It should justify its assumptions if it is to build a case for its conclusions, don't you think? I also think its fairly obvious where physical anthropology is headed, even if the scientists individually labor over their hypotheses and bones and whatnot. Humans evolved right out of nature without the help of aliens, or symbiotic mentor species. I'll go with that theory and leave the door open a crack for Homo Sapiens Sapiens possibly being kept as pets by groups of neotenous Neanderthals in some atypical circumstances. Clan of the Cave Bear and all that.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 16 Nov 2006, 21:42:13

Actually Whippet, You may not need a mentor species to neotenize a social animal. I don't know. I assume, that, in order to do it quickly, captivity or close association is a benefit. Russian fox farmers seemed to have accomplished accelerated neoteny by mating the friendliest foxes they produced with other friendly foxes. Over just a few generations, the foxes tails curled, their ears dropped and disappointing for the farmers, the fox's coats retained the uneven spotty texture of the fox pup. They had, quite literally, created a kind of dog out of a fox in just a few generations. Not good for pelts, but remarkably easy to handle.

....to continue....
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby crapattack » Sat 03 Mar 2007, 05:50:33

Thought I would update y'all on my Austrailian Cattle Dog pup "River" who is now 9 months. I couldn't be more thrilled with this dog. Smart, loyal, very trainable. Just a joy. We've begun to train her on herding sheep and she's very good. She's always wanting to learn more! I wouldn't recommend this breed for anyone who can't give at least a couple hours a day of play/work time though. It's handy that we moved to 13 acres and have lots of activity space for her. Overall I can't believe I waited so long to get a dog!

Image
Ball Obsessed
Image
Fine Lines - Now, 9 months
Image
Big Smile

Image
At about 12 weeks

Image
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Sat 03 Mar 2007, 15:29:07

I can't believe I waited so long to not have a dog. Here are some pictures:

Not obsessed with a ball:

Not obsessed with the dog:

My free time:

My guests, uninterrupted by barking dog:

My yard and garden, free of fecal coliform:

Freed up resources, from not having to feed an animal:

My clear conscience, for not enslaving nature's creatures for my own amusement:
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby crapattack » Sat 03 Mar 2007, 16:43:09

baaahumdog
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby WildRose » Sat 03 Mar 2007, 18:21:17

She's beautiful, crapattack! Sounds like you have a great home for her, and it's obvious from the pictures that she's happy.
User avatar
WildRose
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby crapattack » Sat 03 Mar 2007, 18:32:42

Thanks WildRose, as you can tell I'm fairly dog proud :) but that's cool, I think she's one of the best things in my life. It's done wonders for my PO depression let me tell you. She's fairly intense, like having a canine child! Helps keep me from dwelling too much in my head and I find I'm laughing a lot more. Anyone who's wondering if they should get a dog I would highly recommend it, just choose the right breed for you and your personality - it makes all the difference.
"Ninety percent of everything is crap."
-Theodore Sturgeon

Stay low and run in a random pattern.

List of Civilian Nuclear Accidents
User avatar
crapattack
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Sat 03 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby WildRose » Sat 03 Mar 2007, 18:49:19

Yes, the choosing the right breed is important, as they all have definitive characteristics. My parents had a an Australian cattle dog crossed with a border collie, I think, last year. He was a gorgeous dog, 11 months old, smart, lovable, with tons of energy. My parents, though, couldn't wear him out enough, and one evening he pushed his way past someone in the doorway, chased a wild hare that was sitting on the front lawn and ended up hit by a car a few blocks away. Very sad, as we all loved him.

It looks like you and River are a good match, though, and her needs will be met by you. I agree that dogs have a way of lightening our hearts.
User avatar
WildRose
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: I want a dog.

Unread postby drew » Sat 03 Mar 2007, 18:59:29

We just got a dog in December. And yes they do lift that po depression don't they. Ours is a Lousiana rescue dog that probably spent most of her previous life in kennels. She is only a year old and was caught last july. She is a pointer whippet cross with an awesome personality although she shows evidence of being isolated too much. She is very very frightened of crowds and people for instance. Still we wouldn't trade her for the world. My wife sure is happy, she believed she would have allergy problems which is why we held off so long before getting a dog.


Drew

PS my arm is her chew toy-for hours every day!
User avatar
drew
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: canada

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron