by Omnitir » Sat 10 Dec 2005, 21:38:25
Yeah, personally I hate cell phones as well…
But regarding the social value of games, the point I wanted to make is that games can be physically social. I’m not talking about playing Xbox live with the headset thingy talking to gamers over the world, I’m talking about a group of people coming together for each others company – in the same room – and playing games together as a form of social interaction.
As an example to demonstrate what I’m getting at, I was recently at a friend’s barbeque. In the back yard there was maybe half a dozen people playing a lazy game of cricket. This is the great social atmosphere of sports that people always talk about – people standing around waiting to catch a ball, occasionally someone gets bowled out and everyone shouts and laughs etc., and people telling the occasional joke, often at the expense of the larger gathering inside sitting around the Xbox. For the most part they don’t strike me as being involved in a particularly social activity. They are more concerned with the physical activity of their game.
So I go inside to hang with the people in the lounge room, and there are maybe a dozen people around the place watching four people playing simultaneous Halo. Those playing are being quite loud and obviously enjoying the social interaction, while those not playing are enjoying the spectacle and generally eating, drinking and being merry.
I’ve seen the exact same thing happen with two people competing in driving games or fighting games while others watch on, and even people playing single player games while others sit around and comment on the game and offer comments and suggestions etc.
It’s the exact same social atmosphere of sports in the sense that it’s a game of competition with the same kind of social interaction of competitors and spectators. The difference seems to be that people playing computer games together are more free to actually socialise while the people playing sports usually need to put more effort into the game, limiting social action.
So games can be highly social in the proper setting, regardless of virtual communities. In fact offline console games are often far more social then online PC games, which rarely involves more then one person in the same physical location.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')While you are busy conserving your 'human' energy, playing video games after society collapses (not sure how) your fellow citizens and neighbors will be busy 'harvesting' anything not nailed down in your area. At the end of the day, you will most likely be one of the top rated players on the planet, but will shortly thereafter starve to death...
Well, I guess that depends on what scenario you subscribe to. In an economic collapse, I can imagine some places in America possibly being that bad, but I have great difficulty imagining that kind of thing around here. People in my area tend to be very friendly and social. In any case I don’t believe things are going to be as bad as the extreme pessimists are promoting. And even if they are, and people are starving to death, you need to realise that when people don’t have food they generally don’t have lots of energy to waste. I think it’s more realistic that people would rather conserve energy then join the Mad Max gangs pillaging the streets. But the whole Mad Max scenario is ridiculous anyway.
"Mother Nature is a psychopathic bitch, and she is out to get you. You have to adapt, change or die." - Tihamer Toth-Fejel, nanotech researcher/engineer.