by uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Fri 30 Jan 2009, 08:10:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hope_full', 'A')ll this talk about living in the woods sounds awful. And this talk of "national safety nets" doesn't strike a chord with me, either.
When your life goes to hell in a handbasket, this is where family is supposed to come in, when a mom or dad or sister or brother or auntie is supposed to step up to the plate and offer a place to live and a few meals to eat until things get better.
If you study the Great Depression, you'll find that families migrated to the family member with the biggest house and they all hunkered down and figured out the challenging dynamics of living together until the financial storms had passed.
That's a far better alternative than murdering your wife and dear children.
As stated above, lots of people don't have families who are any better off, are just hanging in, or are totally intolerable.
Living in the woods really isn't that bad. Well... some of us don't have a problem with it. I'd rather have an igloo but hey, beggars can't be choosers. I can't believe things are so bad down there. I can't believe they are not reporting all of this stuff. I can't believe something more isn't being done.
I think ego does have a lot to do with it. I might not have gone and lived in the woods ever since I had kids, but I could again if I had too, but take my kids lives? I know my kids would follow me blindly. My son won't go survival camping in the winter unless I'm with his troop. No matter waht I do with mine, I have no right to take their lives. That is just sick when people start taking others lives because of their shame. Sick and sad!