Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Ebola Pandemic ?!? Pt. 6

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby AndyA » Wed 15 Oct 2014, 20:40:38

It is airborne for up to 3 hrs, it has a half life while in water droplets. Which explains why nurses are getting it, I imagine they were as cautious as possible, but without a proper respirator, you shouldn't be getting close to infected people. Dust masks wont do diddly shit. Which is why passengers aboard the flightS with the sick nurse are required to report to the CDC. I'm not sure what the actual definition of airborne is, but this virus can easily travel through the air. It is also quite happy inside the lungs, so it's there getting breathed out amongst the water vapour you breath out.

The reason they say it isn't airborne is because it doesn't have it's own protective layer, so it can't survive without moisture.

If current rates continue we have about 18 months left before everyone has been exposed. Good luck.
If you want the truth to stand clear before you, never be for or against. The struggle between "for" and "against" is the mind's worst disease. -Sen-ts'an
AndyA
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat 10 Aug 2013, 01:26:33

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Wed 15 Oct 2014, 20:58:50

Late breaking news tonight. Nurse number two called the CDC and reported her rising body temp and was given the green light to fly. (MSNBC)
Unbelievable!!!
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Ebola in town (don't touch your friend)

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 00:02:01

The Ebola hype by the MSM and politicians of both parties is truly becoming comical IMHO. So far one person from Africa has died from the disease and no one from the US has died. Two people in the US have gotten the Ebola bug. The flu, OTOH, is spread much easier the Ebola with the CDC estimating millions in the US which catch one of the flu bug this season with upwards of 30,000 dying Including hundreds of children. Just during the period of the great "Texas Ebola outbreak" about 20 have died in the state including a 13 yo girl.

So how many national news stories have you seen about the great "Texas flu outbreak"? How many congress critters have offered the possibility of flu infected ISIS terrorists sneaking across our borders and sneezing on our defenseless citizens? One more question: how many flu infected children and elderly have been flown to Atlanta for specialized treatment?
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby AndyA » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 01:11:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', 'L')ate breaking news tonight. Nurse number two called the CDC and reported her rising body temp and was given the green light to fly. (MSNBC)
Unbelievable!!!

CDC is run by a Zionist, nuff said.
If you want the truth to stand clear before you, never be for or against. The struggle between "for" and "against" is the mind's worst disease. -Sen-ts'an
AndyA
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat 10 Aug 2013, 01:26:33

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 01:57:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AndyA', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', 'L')ate breaking news tonight. Nurse number two called the CDC and reported her rising body temp and was given the green light to fly. (MSNBC)
Unbelievable!!!

CDC is run by a Zionist, nuff said.

How about run by an incompetent and leave religion or creed out of it. :x
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Ebola in town (don't touch your friend)

Unread postby vtsnowedin » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 02:18:11

The people that are concerned about ebola in America are not worried about the first cases we have today. They are worried about the cases we might have after twenty, twenty day doubling times. Two cases today could on that timeline be 1,048,576 cases in 400 days. It will be a lot easier to get on top of the situation now and stop that progression early rather then wait until we have 500 or a 1000 cases and then might not be able to contain it. I'm only worried about it when I see or hear officials in charge fail to take effective action to stop this spread.
If your worried about the flu get a flue shot. That is something positive you can do about the flu. The only thing we can do about ebola is isolate it and prevent it's transmission onto it's next victims.
User avatar
vtsnowedin
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 14897
Joined: Fri 11 Jul 2008, 03:00:00

Re: Ebola in town (don't touch your friend)

Unread postby Pops » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 06:11:18

So far the 2 secondary infections here are both people who had contact with a hospitalized - very sick - person. Not people on the plane, not pedstrians happening by, not friends or even family in the same apartment.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Ebola in town (don't touch your friend)

Unread postby WildRose » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 10:54:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'S')o far the 2 secondary infections here are both people who had contact with a hospitalized - very sick - person. Not people on the plane, not pedstrians happening by, not friends or even family in the same apartment.


Yes, and it seems like the most contagious period is while a patient is in the throes of severe vomiting and diarrhea. And it seems like contact with the skin is something to be avoided at all costs.

Interesting, I was reading an account of Duncan's time in his girlfriend's apartment, both before and after he was kept in hospital. His girlfriend had said that he was "prideful" in taking care of his personal hygiene while he was there, which to me implies that he was careful to clean surfaces, etc., to avoid spreading his illness. Also, after Duncan was admitted to hospital and kept there (the second time he presented), his stepdaughter went into the girlfriend's apartment, disinfected all the surfaces there, told Duncan's girlfriend not to sleep in the bed where he had slept, brought over a new mattress for the girlfriend to sleep on, cleaned the couches with bleach and bought some new blankets. This was all before the family had been removed from the apartment.

Those measures showed a lot of common sense and probably prevented the family from getting sick.
User avatar
WildRose
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Ebola in town (don't touch your friend)

Unread postby ROCKMAN » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 11:40:43

vt - "The only thing we can do about ebola is isolate it and prevent it's transmission onto it's next victims." True. But also true for influenza and yet not one MSM story about the need to isolate those infected folks. And while we don't know the future of Ebola in the US we do know many millions will be infected with the flu viruses with about 30,000 deaths in the next 12 months. And as you point out we have immunizations for the flu and not Ebola. It would make sense IMHO to take advantage of the current attention to infectious diseases at the moment and explain that some US citizens are 1000's of times more likely to die of the flu then from Ebola. Just think of the hundreds if not thousands of deaths that might be prevented if folks got serious about flu inoculations.

Maybe Dustin Hoffman can quickly knock off a movie showing a ward of flu victims, including babies and grandpa's, slowly wasting away.
User avatar
ROCKMAN
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11397
Joined: Tue 27 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: TEXAS

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby AndyA » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 11:53:28

No, I think it's fair to call McCain a Neo Con, Freidien a Zionist etc. If he was not appointed for his competence, then why was he appointed? Or how do you explain such a seemingly incompetent person rising to the top of an organisation where everyone has a Phd at minimum?
These bastards only care about two things, power and money, this has nothing to do with religion. Zionism is not Judaism..
If you want the truth to stand clear before you, never be for or against. The struggle between "for" and "against" is the mind's worst disease. -Sen-ts'an
AndyA
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat 10 Aug 2013, 01:26:33

Re: Ebola in town (don't touch your friend)

Unread postby Subjectivist » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 11:56:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ROCKMAN', 'v')t - "The only thing we can do about ebola is isolate it and prevent it's transmission onto it's next victims." True. But also true for influenza and yet not one MSM story about the need to isolate those infected folks. And while we don't know the future of Ebola in the US we do know many millions will be infected with the flu viruses with about 30,000 deaths in the next 12 months. And as you point out we have immunizations for the flu and not Ebola. It would make sense IMHO to take advantage of the current attention to infectious diseases at the moment and explain that some US citizens are 1000's of times more likely to die of the flu then from Ebola. Just think of the hundreds if not thousands of deaths that might be prevented if folks got serious about flu inoculations.

Maybe Dustin Hoffman can quickly knock off a movie showing a ward of flu victims, including babies and grandpa's, slowly wasting away.

Everything you said is true, however influenza has a death rate of about 2% mostly among those already weak. Ebola has a death rate of 50% to 90% depending on who is right about it. My biggest fear is for my wife, who is a nurse. Last night she told me she considers it her moral obligation to treat the ill no matter what, then this morning she made sure I know about her life insurance policy.

My secondary fear is, if people get scared and stop going to malls and stores and theaters and sports stadiums how badly will that damage our already weak economy during the Christmas shopping season? A typical retail outlet earns 50% of their yearly income in the eight weeks before Christmas. Stall that spending and the retail industry is going to see a lot of stores closing early next year.
II Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Subjectivist
Volunteer
Volunteer
 
Posts: 4705
Joined: Sat 28 Aug 2010, 07:38:26
Location: Northwest Ohio
Top

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 12:08:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AndyA', ' ')Freidien [sic] ..... If he was not appointed for his competence, then why was he appointed?


Obama appointed Dr. Frieden to be head of the CDC mainly because he is an Obama supporter who donates campaign money to the Ds.

Thats how political appointments are made in the US. Sadly, much like the guy Obama appointed to be head of the VA system, Frieden has turned out to be dangerously incompetent.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Ebola in town (don't touch your friend)

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 15:23:10

Good news/ bad news.

Destroying or slowing consumption has benefits. Keeping the economy going BAU is not one of them.

This is a cunudrum we face with or without ebola. Ebola just forces the alternative upon us.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby Newfie » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 15:25:12

It has always been so, some presidents are better than others.

I'm no Obama supporter, but to this is unique is a fiction.

Heck of a job there Brownie.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 15:43:08

Freiden is clearly not doing a good job. We've got two nurses infected with Ebola, and as many as 200 people who are being tracked because of potential exposures that occurred AFTER the Liberian guy was diagnosed with Ebola. The CDC's job is to prevent all of that from happening. The CDC is definitely not doing a good job.

The NY TIMES is reporting that the "ebola procedures" that the CDC distributed to US hospitals were woefully inadequate---in spite of the fact that the CDC had more than enough time to get ready---the epidemic started in Africa six months ago. How many times did Freiden (and obama) appear on TV to tell us that Ebola was unlikely to get to the US (wrong) and the US hospital system was ready and prepared for Ebola---even wronger. Even the CDC itself isn't prepared for Ebola ---- they are responsible for telling the second nurse that it was OK for her to travel by passenger jet AFTER she self-reported to them that she had a fever. That screwup put another 130 people on that plane at risk of contracting Ebola, and that doesn't count the thousands of people in the two airline terminals, some of whom may've come in contact with the nurse, or sat in a chair that she just vacated, or got sneezed on, etc.

Face facts----Obama appointed Freiden and Freiden doesn't seem to be up to the job. The last thing we want is more screwups by the CDC and more potential ebola infections in the US.

Image
In my opinion Obama should fire Freiden and get someone competent in there --- just as he had to do in the VA mess after the political crony he put in office there also turned out to be a disaster.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Ebola in town (don't touch your friend)

Unread postby Graeme » Thu 16 Oct 2014, 16:03:58

Flu is not an epidemic (CDC); ebola is (WHO).

How Are Nurses Becoming Infected With Ebola?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he World Health Organization (WHO), United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Australia and many countries recommend health workers treating Ebola wear surgical masks for protection, along with other personal protective equipment such gowns, gloves and goggles.

A glaring inconsistency of these guidelines is that lab scientists working with Ebola are recommended to use respirators, which offer more protection than surgical masks, while masks are deemed adequate for doctors and nurses at the front line. The hospital ward, however, is a far more contaminated and volatile environment than the sterile, highly controlled lab.

Nurses have the closest contact with patients, and deserve all available protection for their occupational health and safety. This means higher personal protective equipment, including respirators.


Ebola kills 50% to 90% of people who become infected, which is much higher than any other infection we are used to dealing with. The 2009 influenza pandemic killed less than 0.01% of those infected, and SARS killed 15%.

The price of getting it wrong with flu guidelines might be a week in bed, but for Ebola it is far more likely to be death. The risk analysis equation we need to use must consider not only the probability of Ebola turning up on our shores, but also the consequences.

Unprecedented epidemic
The current West African Ebola outbreak has caused more than 8000 cases and more than 4000 deaths, with the epicenter being Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia.


As the epidemic increases exponentially in West Africa there is a risk of imported cases occurring around the world. The first of these was in Dallas, Texas, but countries everywhere are on the alert for suspected cases.

Experts have estimated that the risk of a travel-related case being imported into Europe is up to 75% by the end of October.

This epidemic is unprecedented because:

It is the largest and longest in history;
It is the first time Ebola has occurred in more than one country simultaneously;
It is the first time Ebola has affected urban areas and capital cities; and
It is the first time Ebola has been transmitted from person to person outside of Africa.

Health authorities such as the US CDC are conveying certainty that Ebola cannot be transmitted by any means other than direct contact. But it’s a very poorly studied infection compared with other diseases and the sum of the evidence shows significant uncertainty around transmission.


While the predominant mode of transmission of Ebola is contact, some scientists believe it could also be spread by aerosols. Studies in monkeys (here, here, here and here) and pigs have demonstrated non-contact transmission of Ebola, which could be airborne or aerosol.


science20
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand
Top

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 17 Oct 2014, 01:24:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')hats how political appointments are made in the US. Sadly, much like the guy Obama appointed to be head of the VA system, Frieden has turned out to be dangerously incompetent.


Wasn't the secret service director a political appointee, too? She was clearly unqualified. They had all those scandals and one big mess and screwup after another.

These are important jobs -- CDC, secret service, etc. They need qualified strong leaders, executive types not college professors.

Political patronage has always been a thing in the US, and has ebbed and flowed over time with how bad it is.

I think it's out of hand again. Would almost be better just to create a House of Lords and let a new president knight top campaign donors with some royal title -- at least then you could actually appoint *qualified* people to lead these agencies and it not be presitge / cushy gov job reward goodies to hand out.

It's an even bigger problem with ambassadors -- many are not qualified, they're just outright campaign donor rewards. Pay enough money and you get to be ambassador to Luxembourg or whatever.

Then there was also that Air Force scandal where a top brass gave a massive contract to Boeing-Lockheed and then he retires right after that *and got a VP job with Boeing*. Elon Musk claimed that the guy fished around with him wanting a spacex job and he told him no, then Boeing gets the contract. That's old teapot dome stuff, but it's not even a scandal these days.

So you've got all that usual corruption crap going on where nobody gets hurt but except the taxpayer, but then the top leadership of some very important agencies are all political reward apointees too.

It's really wrong when it's something as important as CDC. The guy has made so many mistakes. And Obama still listens to him, STILL won't end these darn flights from Liberia and Nigeria.

The Obama administration is giving tourist visas to Liberians, for goodness sake!

The outrageous part of it is we only get 150 people flying in from Liberia flying per day, it's not like the economy would grind to a halt -- JUST BAN THE FLIGHTS. It's common sense. And we didn't do it, Obama still won't do it, and look what happened a Liberian with ebola flew over here and started a pandemic.

Obama admin is still letting Liberians fly here, right now.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 17 Oct 2014, 01:37:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')he NY TIMES is reporting that the "ebola procedures" that the CDC distributed to US hospitals were woefully inadequate


I saw on CNN that the CDC guidelines aren't as good as the WHO. In Dallas, incredulous nurses were asking why the heck they were covered head to toe except for their necks and mouth. How does that make any sense.

Meanwhile, at Emory they know what the heck they are doing and have their own protocols and don't follow the CDC -- at Emory their staff have no exposed skin.

Same thing in those tent hospitals in Africa -- they've got more sense then how we were doing this in the US, it's crazy, these nurses didn't have the right protection. They weren't even totally covered, much less a hazmat suit.

There's a very simple neck apron thing that really they should have been wearing. That's what they do at Emory, but that's not the CDC guideline.

And you know what?

Idiots on a forum like me shouldn't be the one to point all this out -- it SHOULD have been common sense for the CDC director. Of course you'd better cover the f*ck up, 100%, if you're treating ebola patients. That's what they do in Africa, why have different guidelines here? So many screwups.

P.S. -- that hospital is 2/3 empty now. They may have to wind up closing. Nobody will go there now, for anything, it's the "ebola hospital."

These initial cases never should have been left in Dallas, to start with. Another CDC screwup.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 17 Oct 2014, 01:44:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', 'L')ate breaking news tonight. Nurse number two called the CDC and reported her rising body temp and was given the green light to fly. (MSNBC)
Unbelievable!!!


CDC and Obama admin need to stop blaming the nurses. They left those nurses all alone to figure out a confusing mess for themselves and nobody even bothered to send them the right gear. One nurse said it made no sense, she knew she could just order it on Amazon and get in 2 days so why were they saying the supplies weren't coming in.

It's retarded, they can cover up in Africa to treat ebola patients and here we have our first case and the patient's room -- AND HALLWAYS -- were piled high with medical waste, and these nurses didn't even have the right gear on. No wonder they caught ebola.

CDC director can't even give straight answers to Congress in his testimony.

Do we need a full blown pandemic and it already be too late, before this guy resigns and somebody gets put in charge that can stop it before it's too late?

General Dempsey is all ready to handle it once it goes pandemic -- but you know, why not put him in charge of it WHILE IT COULD STILL BE STOPPED?

It's all so outrageous, this isn't like Katrina, a hurricane can't kill millions, this is letting pandemic into this country because of gross incompetence and political patronage appointees.
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Ebola possible outcomes?

Unread postby Sixstrings » Fri 17 Oct 2014, 02:06:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')img]http://cbswashington.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/457317190.jpg?w=620&h=349&crop=1[/img]

Alarm after vomiting passenger dies on flight from Nigeria to JFK

A plane from Nigeria landed at JFK Airport Thursday with a male passenger aboard who had died during the flight after a fit of vomiting — and CDC officials conducted a “cursory” exam before announcing there was no Ebola and turning the corpse over to Port Authority cops to remove, Rep. Peter King said on Thursday.
The congressman was so alarmed by the incident — and by what he and employees see as troubling Ebola vulnerabilities at JFK — that he fired off a letter to the federal Department of Homeland Security demanding more training and tougher protocols for handling possible cases there.

The unnamed, 63-year-old passenger had boarded an Arik Air plane out of Lagos, Nigeria, on Wednesday night, a federal law enforcement source said.

During the flight, the man had been vomiting in his seat, the source said. Some time before the plane landed, he passed away. Flight crew contacted the CDC, federal customs officials and Port Authority police, who all boarded the plane at around 6 a.m. as about 145 worried passengers remained on board, the source said.
http://nypost.com/2014/10/16/alarm-after-vomiting-passenger-dies-on-flight-from-nigeria-to-jfk/


Article says "cursory" examination.

Are they really sure it was ebola? If not, what the heck did a Nigerian die of, after vomiting all during the flight?
User avatar
Sixstrings
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 15160
Joined: Tue 08 Jul 2008, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests