by Timo » Mon 10 Jan 2011, 12:30:50
From an historical perspective, there's nothing new about political protests, here in the U.S., or anywhere else. It may be entirely possible that the Congresswoman wasn't even shot in any form of political protest, at all. But, during my lifetime, i've seen both the angry left and the angry right rise up in various forms of political protest. During the 60s, the far left decried the Vietnam War, bombings, guns, and quite literally any other form of violence. I know there were some exceptions, but the essential rule was "Give peace a chance." Today, however, the far left has been replaced by the far right. The protests are roughly equal in size and media stature, but what differes to no small degree is the message. People who espouse a "leftist" view are put down on public hit lists. Images of people are shown with crosshairs, as if looking through a rifle scope. Violence toward those we disagree with is a much larger part of the accepted message being forced from within this country. Where as the angry left does not like guns and violence, the angry right sees those very means as their only way to get what they want.
Anybody else see a civil war brewing?
Last edited by Timo on Mon 10 Jan 2011, 12:51:44, edited 1 time in total.