by crapattack » Sun 29 Jan 2006, 04:12:46
Nero:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')f you dismiss the long term potential of the oil sands you're probably got too much invested in your personal doomer fetish and are not thinking objectively about the problem.
Take a look at this,
http://www.technologyreview.com/NanoTec ... 18,p1.html, posted by DigitalCubano on
http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic16102.html, and say that. The amount of fresh water and NG used is staggering let alone the environmental impacts. Currently the tar sands produce 220,000 bpd, and they are going all out to try to reach 350,000 bpd by 2008. CAEP estimates the tar sands can produce, 2 million per day by 2010, according to
http://www.energybulletin.net/3458.html. The world consumes 82million bpd. Given these numbers tar sands is hardly the "significant source of energy" you describe even if they reach their target in 2010. Considering how difficult it is to extract and process, extremelly expensive monetarily and environmentally as well. One thing for sure is it's making investors lots of money.