Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on September 23, 2018

Bookmark and Share

How The Sahara Could Power The Entire World

How The Sahara Could Power The Entire World thumbnail

Solar and wind farms, stretched across North Africa’s Saharan desert and relying solely on existing technologies, could produce enough electricity to power the entire world. (That amount of electricity approximates over 21 terawatt hours.) As an added benefit these combined wind and solar arrays would also increase rain fail in the arid Sahel region thereby slowing the steady southern encroachment of the desert.

This was the conclusion arrived at by academic researchers using supercomputers. Teams at the University of Maryland and University of Illinois modeled their results in a study financed in part by a Chinese government agency. Their results were published in the prestigious journal Science (September 7).

Yes, we know it sounds farfetched. And even perhaps too ridiculous consider. But is it any crazier or more uneconomic than the two biggest nuclear construction projects currently underway in the U.S. and Europe? Spending $25 billion or more to erect bespoke nuclear power generating stations (when a comparable gas fired facility could be built at a relatively small fraction of the cost) shows that regardless of economics, for those that the politicians favor, funds can often be found.

And it is not just new nuclear technologies that should be singled out for economic excesses. Southern Company’s recent attempt at building a truly clean coal electric power generating station resulted in the $4 billion Kemper County project in Mississippi. That facility now only burns natural gas rendering large parts of the investment economically irrelevant.

But for sheer scale it is typically nuclear construction that provides the biggest numbers. In this regard consider the proposed $20-$30 billion ITER nuclear fusion project. The point? We already spend huge sums to experiment with and develop increasingly carbon free power sources. From a technological perspective the Sahara wind/solar project is practically “old school”. It relies exclusively on so called off the shelf, existing technologies.

The challenge as we see it, apart from financing, would come from the actual construction. Giant construction projects in relatively inhospitable climates almost always pose a challenge. This would be akin to building the Alaska pipeline or putting huge oil rigs in the North Sea or in Arctic waters.

A German consortium, DESERTEC, proposed a Saharan solar project in 2009 based on work that goes back to the 1980s. The organization made promising financial projections based on its research. Its shareholders included major Mediterranean infrastructure and electricity firms and State Grid of China.

Wind and solar projects can also produce “unintended consequences” for the environment as the Illinois and Maryland researchers gently put it. In the Saharan case though, the consequences, more precipitation, might actually be beneficial.

From the perspective of the earth’s surface, wind and solar farms change surface roughness and reflectance. This raises local temperatures–the last thing the Sahara needs. However, the temperature boost also increases the likelihood of precipitation, in fact doubling it in this particularly arid region. That would in turn lead to increases in vegetation growth. More vegetative ground cover increases evaporation which, in turn, increases precipitation. Solar farms by themselves could have a similar environmental impact.

Admittedly, the university researchers did not address a whole host of concerns: social, political, business and technological. The challenge of constructing solar and wind farms across the Sahara Desert and then delivering the power to those who need it is a daunting task. But the researchers did interestingly address the impact of the project on climate and concluded it would be beneficial. That’s at least a start.

Would relatively small European and American energy companies rise to a challenge of this magnitude? Or would the Sahara project developers, if there is one, propose this ambitious project to the Chinese as part of their One Belt, One Road Initiative? From a policy perspective China has made no secret of its interest in Africa. It would be ironic if they embarked on an ambitious undertaking like this while domestically the US plays “small ball” and focuses on subsidies for relatively uneconomic coal and nuclear power generating stations to extend their economic lives.

By Leonard Hyman and William Tilles



7 Comments on "How The Sahara Could Power The Entire World"

  1. Davy on Sun, 23rd Sep 2018 11:59 am 

    When there is a breakthrough with storage and transmission then I am all ears. When the region offers stability get back to me. The construction and maintenance costs are huge in places like the Sahara. I am sure there are sweet spots to apply wind and solar. Now is the time to apply them. I doubt this will be much more than a regional niche.

  2. Cloggie on Sun, 23rd Sep 2018 12:54 pm 

    There is no revelation about this article. A simple back-of-an-envelop calculation shows that you can power the entire world with an area the size of Spain, covered with solar panels.

    Europe, or the world for that matter, would be mad to locate its power generation in an area like North-Africa, unless you recolonize the joint again.

    There is still ample room for millions and millions of panels on the roofs of Europe and hundreds of thousands of wind turbines in the North Sea and elsewhere.

    North-Africa could be encouraged though to use their superb radiation conditions to produce hydrogen for European markets, as long as Europe doesn’t make itself too dependent on a single energy supplier.

  3. onlooker on Sun, 23rd Sep 2018 1:15 pm 

    Yes, when their is a breakthrough with storage/intermittency and transmission. And when the world agrees to be nice and share. Not holding my breath

  4. Go Speed Racer on Sun, 23rd Sep 2018 1:37 pm 

    The sand will cover up the panels.
    MY plan for the Sahara is fill it up
    with water. That will cause global
    cooling,
    and the locals can run their soeedboats
    in it.

  5. rockman on Sun, 23rd Sep 2018 3:44 pm 

    So to join the rest of the choir:

    “Admittedly, the university researchers did not address a whole host of concerns: social, political, business and technological”

    So they didn’t consider “social” (whatever that means), “political” (the countries in the region that would be directly impacted), “business” (what it would cost and the profit…if any) and “technical” (could such a huge project actually be built).

    Sounds like a well thought out plan that deserves serious consideration. LOL

  6. Nostradamus on Sun, 23rd Sep 2018 6:32 pm 

    I vote for Go Speed Racer’s idea.

  7. Antius on Mon, 24th Sep 2018 1:56 pm 

    Cloggie is correct. We would be foolish to devote large scale resources to infrastructure in the Sahara. It would put the nations of Europe in a very precarious position – at the mercy of North African governments.

    I gave some thought to how the risk might be managed. Maybe if the solar electric presented no more than a small amount of total power production; we back it up with open cycle gas turbines (which would probably never get used); put solar infrastructure in many different locations; have one long distance DC cable serve multiple customers, etc. Maybe it could be part of the solution if we do not become too dependent upon it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *