Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on March 16, 2018

Bookmark and Share

Kennedy Jr. takes bullish stand on e-revolution fast overtaking oil

Kennedy Jr. takes bullish stand on e-revolution fast overtaking oil thumbnail

Expect peak oil production to arrive in something more like five years than the 50 years forecast by much of the energy industry, environmentalist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Thursday.

It won’t be because the world is running out of oil, but because that’s how fast he’s betting innovations in cheap renewable power, batteries and electric vehicles will start to overtake traditional oil and internal combustion engines, Kennedy told the Globe 2018 conference on sustainable business in Vancouver.

Kennedy recounted a retiring Shell executive a year ago who talked about oil demand peaking in 10 years, “not because it’s too dirty to burn, because they’re not going to be able to sell it.”

Kennedy spoke as part of a Globe panel discussion with Vancity CEO Tamara Vrooman and Wal van Lierop, a leading clean-technology investor and founder of Chrysalix Venture Capital.

And he made the bold prediction on the day federal Natural Resources Minister re-committed to the Canadian government’s strategy of attempting to boost renewable energy and clean technologies while “making the best use” of its petroleum resources by ensuring Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain pipeline expansion get built.

Talking to reporters after the panel discussion, Kennedy characterized that as “a political minefield (that Canada) is trying to negotiate.”

“I’m glad they’re spending that money on renewables, I wish they weren’t building the pipeline, that’s what I’ll say,” Kennedy said.

Globe, held every two years, puts some 2,000 business leaders and government officials together to talk about ways to do business more sustainably at a time of growing tensions between traditional resource industries and new, cleaner alternatives.

Kennedy and Van Leirop are among the most bullish of clean-technology boosters. Yet, with only 3,500 cars on the road as of 2017, electric vehicles are a small fraction of one per cent of passenger cars in B.C.

Their panel discussion, titled “beyond clean capitalism,” was billed by organizers as an update of the discussion they had at the 2014 edition of Globe to talk about how much progress there has been made since then in making sustainability the ‘cost of doing business.’

Van Lierop argued that in a lot of instances, economics are already pushing investment into clean technologies.

For power utilities, the cost to install solar wind power has dropped below two cents a kilowatt hour, van Lierop said, “so it’s no wonder that new capacities in energy generation have, primarily in North America, been the new stuff.”

“Clean energy has crossed the cost cap,” van Lierop said, and he questions whether new fossil-fuel projects approved today will have a lifespan of 40 or 50 years, the time frame typically expected to amortize large capital project.

“That’s a stretch,” van Lierop said.

Kennedy has “applied hope” for the future of clean technology, even as U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration continues to eliminate incentives for solar and wind energy and promote development of oil and coal.

That, Kennedy said, will hurt America, but won’t necessarily slow down innovation.

“India and China will step in where the U.S. leaves a vacuum,” in terms of developing renewable energy, Kennedy said.

However, Vrooman said for the transition toward clean technologies to move as fast as enthusiasts want, the world of finance will have to keep up.

Vrooman said that from Vancity’s research, the investment world remains very conservative. More of Vancity’s customers have indicated they would like to make so-called green investments than they have green investment products to put money in.

BEGIN OPTIONAL CUT

Part of Thursday’s agenda involved pushing government towards being friendlier to so-called clean innovations, perhaps a welcome distraction for federal ministers attending the event and taking criticism over Ottawa’s support of the Trans Mountain project.

“The key message is that clean innovation is a huge opportunity for all parts of the Canadian economy,” said Stewart Elgie, co-chair of the Smart Prosperity Leaders Initiative, a group of business leaders and academics.

Vancouver Sun



45 Comments on "Kennedy Jr. takes bullish stand on e-revolution fast overtaking oil"

  1. MASTERMIND on Fri, 16th Mar 2018 7:21 pm 

    This whole peak oil demand nonsense is obviously a desperate attempt to solve peak oil supply. And it is laughable.

  2. MASTERMIND on Fri, 16th Mar 2018 7:22 pm 

    Based on the fact you can’t take an EV out of the city. They are pretty much worthless to most Americans…

  3. Antius on Fri, 16th Mar 2018 7:46 pm 

    Yeah, its obvious that a car costing $100,000, taking hours to recharge using infrastructure that doesn’t even exist and requiring embodied energy equivalent to several years of driving, will completely steal the IC market share in a decade.

    What great miracle are these people honestly expecting? They really think that a manufactured battery with one fiftieth the energy density of gasoline, which is pumped out of the ground for almost free, is actually going to outperform it on a cost basis?

    It reminds me of all the stupid mindless euphoria surrounding hydrogen fuel cells 20 years ago. Hydrogen fuel cells were supposed to be the clean replacement for IC engines that ran on the most abundant fuel in the universe. Quick as flash, nothing happened. If the political ideologues pushing all this shite understood anything about the limitations of the technologies they are championing, they wouldn’t be so surprised when these things failed to happen.

  4. observerbane on Fri, 16th Mar 2018 9:49 pm 

    occupy has the 1 percent . so what does the 1 percent have in common with metoo ? half of the accused are joos . someone plz post that everywhere

  5. Boat on Fri, 16th Mar 2018 11:17 pm 

    All the hours spent writing about peak oil, that just keeps growing. King Herberry is trolling in his grave.

    Russia cuts oil, the Saudi cut Oil, Venz cuts oil. The frackers say, “we’ll take our tight oil and shove it up your … Peak oil my ass.

  6. GregT on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 12:21 am 

    “All the hours spent writing about peak oil, that just keeps growing.”

    Only eclipsed by the denial of the fact that peak cheap conventional oil is already in the rearview mirror, and that the only things really growing now, are exponentially growing mountains of un-repayable debt.

  7. MASTERMIND on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 12:30 am 

    Boat we have consumed less oil than we have discovered for 34 years in a row..And you don’t think this is a issue going forward? Are you mentally retarded?
    https://imgur.com/a/6dEDt

    Oil discoveries in 2017 hit all-time low –Houston Chronicle
    https://www.chron.com/business/energy/article/Oil-discoveries-in-2017-hit-all-time-low-12447212.php

    Hey boat we discovered the least amount of new oil last year while also consuming the most ever. do you think that will be a problem going forward?

    Chevron CEO warns US shale oil alone cannot meet the world’s growing demand for crude
    https://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/01/us-shale-cannot-meet-the-worlds-growing-oil-demand-chevron-ceo-warns.html

    Peak U.S. Shale Could Be 4 Years Away
    https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/Peak-US-Shale-Could-Be-4-Years-Away.html

    Shale can’t even be made into diesel or jet fuel. nobody wants that junk oil..

  8. MASTERMIND on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 12:34 am 

    Boat

    Existing oil reserves are scheduled to begin a catastrophic crash within 1 to 3 years. When it hits the economic and social damage will be catastrophic. The end of Western Civilization, from China to Europe, to the US, will not occur when oil runs out. The economic and social chaos will occur when supplies are merely reduced sufficiently….
    https://imgur.com/a/6dEDt
    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7382/full/481433a.html
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421509001281
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142151300342X
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236114010254
    http://www.geo.cornell.edu/eas/energy/the_challenges/peak_oil.html
    http://www.energybulletin.net/sites/default/files/Peak%20Oil_Study%20EN.pdf
    http://www.scribd.com/document/367688629/HSBC-Peak-Oil-Report-2017

    Now get out of here and go back to the book burner blog. I mean POB! with that dumbshit Dennis the faggot. We are going to have a fast transition in energy just like smart phones according to dennis…LOL

  9. Cloggie on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 1:04 am 

    Kennedy is right. Peak oil demand in 1-2 decades. E-vehicles taking of in China, India and Europe.

    And I think Japan is right to bet on fuel cells, not way-too-heavy batteries.

    https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2017/08/17/future-of-e-vehicles-batteries-or-fuel-cell/

    https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2017/12/24/building-a-hydrogen-refueling-station-in-48-hours-time-lapse/

  10. MASTERMIND on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 1:12 am 

    Clogg

    IEA Sees No Peak Oil Demand ‘Any Time Soon’
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/iea-sees-no-peak-oil-demand-any-time-soon-1488816002

    UC Davis Peer Reviewed Study: It Will Take 131 Years to Replace Oil with Alternatives (Malyshkina, 2010)
    http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es100730q

    Kennedy is dumb fuck politician who is trying to appear ‘green” so he can get ahold of power. You are as dumb as they come and grasping at straws now.

  11. GregT on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 1:31 am 

    “Kennedy is right. Peak oil demand in 1-2 decades. E-vehicles taking of in China, India and Europe.”

    Too little too late Cloggie. It’s likely that a runaway greenhouse event has already been triggered, and if it hasn’t yet, it most certainly will be well within 2 decades.

  12. Davy on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 3:54 am 

    “Kennedy is right. Peak oil demand in 1-2 decades. E-vehicles taking of in China, India and Europe.”
    Peak oil demand in 1-2 decades if the economy holds. Unconventionals require a strong economy to make them affordable. E-vehicles are taking off in the US also but in all location the applications will be limited. Part of the limitations are affluence and part application. It is too early to tell but it may be the case that E-vehicles will limit economic activity where as cheap fossil fuels allowed much more economic potential. This means less affluence in locations that embrace e-vehicles and go significantly alternative energy. We don’t need all the affluence we have but remember it takes affluence to do all these alternative energy with associated transport systems and activities.

    “And I think Japan is right to bet on fuel cells, not way-too-heavy batteries.”
    Hydrogen and fuel cells likely have only a limited application and their cost and effectiveness points to a problem with scaling. Fuel cells are likely not a silver bullet.

  13. Cloggie on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 4:33 am 

    test

  14. Cloggie on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 4:35 am 

    Sigh, two long posts disappeared. That’s a lot of time wasted. Let’s try again by cutting it up in parts.

    Too little too late Cloggie. It’s likely that a runaway greenhouse event has already been triggered, and if it hasn’t yet, it most certainly will be well within 2 decades.

    Perhaps. If so, it was nice to have known you all.

    But perhaps it won’t, nobody knows for sure.

    #GlobalLukeWarming

    “Yeah, its obvious that a car costing $100,000, taking hours to recharge using infrastructure that doesn’t even exist and requiring embodied energy equivalent to several years of driving, will completely steal the IC market share in a decade.”

    $100k? Really?

    3 hours to charge? Wonder what you are doing between 1-4 a.m. Should I call the police?lol

    [part 1]

  15. Cloggie on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 4:41 am 

    Can’t even post 3 lines

  16. Cloggie on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 4:44 am 

    The forum software is probably too crappy to inform one that he is banned.

  17. Davy on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 5:11 am 

    Here is a piece of the puzzle for our transportation future without trying to reinvent the wheel. Not to knock EV’s and fuel cells but let’s admit these are ready to go and will be great fits for many transportation niches EV’s and other transport options can’t fill. The best way to cover all niches is demand management and the best aspect of demand management is drive less. When driving combine your trip purposes. Get your ice cream when you make your shopping trip for example. This requires education and that is something that can easily be incorporated into our lives.

    “Toyota’s New Powertrain Raises the Bar on Fuel Efficiency”
    https://tinyurl.com/y962h2zy

    “Toyota Motor Corporation has announced a new all-encompassing powertrain coming this spring as part of a five-year plan to make a sportier and more fuel-efficient fleet. Sounds like a knockout combination if we’ve ever heard one. Already high-ranking in the fuel-economy game, the manufacturer stated that the new engine will jump off with a powerful, yet cleaner, 2.0-liter number. And the unit will be integrated first in the Toyota Yaris hatchback (i.e. the European/Japanese Corolla) revealed in Geneva with a mid-2018 launch. According to Automotive News, the new engines and transmissions will power 80 percent of forthcoming Toyota vehicles. Appearing in the Camry sedan last year, the engine’s Dynamic Force feature has been tweaked and swooped-up to perform with an 18 percent improved fuel-efficiency and an 18 percent zippier acceleration. And when conjoined with a hybrid system, the engine will get 9 percent better fuel economy and 18 percent better speed out of the gates.”

  18. pointer on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 5:35 am 

    Toyota Yaris hatchback… sportier… hahahahahahhahahahahahahha

  19. Davy on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 5:38 am 

    pointer, is sportier really something we need? My wife had a Yaris and it was a good reliable car. It was a little on the lightly built side but she never had a problem with it.

  20. twocats on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 7:22 am 

    EV sales are SKYROCKETING! IN EU – those enlightened buddhas of clean energy – EVs have ROCKED the market!!!!

    Total market share of hybrids and full electric has DOMINATED and has SOARED from just a little of 1% to a CRUSHING ALMOST 1.25%. And that’s just 2 YEARS!!!

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/625010/electric-vehicle-market-share-in-eu-annual/

    and even though its massively dishonest to take penny stock trends into infinity let’s just say we have this type of sustained gigantic growth in the EU. Well, they will reach, let’s round WAAAAY up and give them 0.25% in two years. well, they will reach 100% EV / Hybrid (still using gas!!) of market share in approximately 790 years? wait, that can’t be right.

  21. MASTERMIND on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 8:12 am 

    The US is only one false flag away from Nuking Russia back into the stone ages! It will be epic! Get ready!

  22. Shortend on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 8:41 am 

    Robert Kennedy Junior means well but is mistaken and just hoping for a alternative.
    His documentary film “The Last Mountain” is excellent to view
    The Last Mountain
    Directed by
    Bill Haney
    Produced by
    Clara Bingham
    Eric Grunebaum
    Bill Haney
    Written by
    Bill Haney
    Peter Rhodes
    Starring
    Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
    Maria Gunnoe
    Bo Webb
    Ed Wiley
    Jennifer Hall-Massey
    Narrated by
    William Sadler
    Music by
    Claudio Ragazzi
    Cinematography
    Tim Hotchner
    Stephen McCarthy
    Jerry Risius
    Edited by
    Peter Rhodes
    Distributed by
    Dada Films
    Uncommon Productions
    Release date
    June 3, 2011
    Running time
    95 minutes
    Country
    United States
    Language
    English
    Based in part on Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s 2005 book, Crimes Against Nature and featuring Kennedy and a cast of activists and experts, the film considers the health consequences of mining and burning coal and looks at the context and history of environmental laws in the United States. Exploring a proposal to build a wind farm on a mountain in the heart of “coal country,” rather than deforesting and demolishing the mountain for the coal seams within, the film suggests that wind resources are plentiful in the U.S., would provide many domestic jobs and that wind is a more benign source of power than coal and has the potential to eliminate the destructive aspects of coal

  23. Sissyfuss on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 9:42 am 

    That has to be a misprint, that environmentalist Kennedy recently retired as a Shell executive. And I would think that the miniscule paltry amount of EVs in Canada is a symptom of their reduced efficacy in the colder climes of the North.

  24. Sissyfuss on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 9:44 am 

    Oops, misread recounting as becoming. Never mind.

  25. Outcast_Searcher on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 10:18 pm 

    Mastermind, you’re the one who is laughable. With charging networks on the interstates, more chargers being installed over time, and longer range EV’s becoming a reality (like the 310 mile Model 3 being produced, the idea you can’t take an EV out of the city is nonsensical. Especially when people are driving their Teslas cross-country in the US.

  26. MASTERMIND on Sat, 17th Mar 2018 11:21 pm 

    Outcast

    Family vacation in our Tesla…Okay honey we have drove our 200 miles. Time to pull over and filler up for the night! LOL

  27. Cloggie on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 12:04 am 

    “Family vacation in our Tesla…Okay honey we have drove our 200 miles. Time to pull over and filler up for the night! LOL”

    A family vacation happens once in a year at most. No need to design a new car systeem around that event. Take the train or plane or go hiking within range. My first vacations as a toddler took place on beaches in the Zeeland province, 150 km from the parental home and we got there by train and bus, end fifties, sixties:

    https://goo.gl/images/qEhXPq

    That’s good enough for you, f*.

  28. deadly on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 3:03 am 

    Got some news for you: Oil is going to sell.

    Everywhere, all the time.

    It should read ‘takes bullshit stand’ not ‘bullish stand’. Another ‘do as I say, not as I do’ clueless American.

    Grocery stores should be big enough so you can drive your car down the aisles and never leave your vehicle.

    The only reason to have an EV, no emissions when driving to pick up a bag of chips and a Mars bar. You can be waiting in line inside your EV at a Walmart and not be filling up the place with carbon monoxide.

    Might as well have a house so large that you can drive your EV to each room and then it is right there when you are done hanging around in your bedroom or the living room.

    It is normal to live most of your living years in your car, not just the morning and early evening commute. Must be these days.

    When you visit McDonald’s, you can stay in your car and still get something to eat.

    What McDonald’s should do is give everyone that works there an EV so they can drive to your EV in the parking lot and hand you your food right there. No drive through necessary.

    Everyone should be at your beck and call.

    What is this world coming to?

  29. Cloggie on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 4:33 am 

    Family vacation in our Tesla…Okay honey we have drove our 200 miles. Time to pull over and filler up for the night! LOL

    The highway range of an Opel Ampera = Chevrolet Bolt is 500 km, not 200 miles:

    https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2017/07/21/opel-ampera-e-chevrolet-bolt/

    Expect this to improve rapidly in the coming decade, including lowering the required charge time.

    E-buses in my native Eindhoven are recharged in 30 minutes, several times a day.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZR1MWh4-6vA

    [7:55]

    The range is “clearly over 100 km per charge”, but in case of traffic jams just 75 km. Some buses make more than 300 km per day, so they need to be charged 3 times per day.

    Battery capacity: 180 kWh
    Average exhaustion: 140 kWh before recharge
    Life span battery: 7 years

  30. Davy on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 5:59 am 

    EV’s are vital to our future but they will likely never assimilate seamlessly into the car culture we have today. The scale and affordability are not there. The physics is not there. These are three very important variables that likely will not be overcome with alternatives to fossil fuels. They can extend our way of life “without a future”. They can reduce our exposure to peak oil dynamics and extend out the brick wall of limits. They can likely free up more fossil fuels for latter. They won’t make a rats ass difference for climate change because human behavior is not adapting fast enough besides climate change is likely already been tipped into its own self-reinforcing dynamics beyond human intervention. I am all for EV’s let’s embrace them but let’s don’t lie to ourselves about their future.

  31. Sissyfuss on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 10:56 am 

    Wow Cloggensogger, your vacations are in black and white commensurate with your thought processes.

  32. Kenz300 on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 11:57 am 

    Investors that make money invest in the future or where the world is going. That would be renewables and sustainable energy.

    Investing in fossil fuels is investing in the past. That is for losers.

  33. rockman on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 3:21 pm 

    “The highway range of an Opel Ampera = Chevrolet Bolt’s 500 km, not 200 miles” Which is 500 km X 0.62 which is a tad more then 300 miles. But good enough for city drivers…if they like driving such a vehicle. Regardless of a switch over the 5 year time frame is still ridiculous: there are more then 1.2 BILLION ICE’s on the road and most will be running in 5 years. But even worse: for every 1 EV being bought today about 70+ ICE are being added to the global fleet. That ratio has to change SIGNIFICANTLY before a decrease in demand as a result of the EV can even be fantasized about. IMHO a better chance motor fuel demand decreasing as a result of a big price increase in fuel long before EV’s have such an impact.

  34. Cloggie on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 3:45 pm 

    “Wow Cloggensogger, your vacations are in black and white commensurate with your thought processes.”

    You are more the colorful rainbow type, right?

    @rockman, to give you an idea of the expected time frame:

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jul/13/electric-cars-to-account-for-all-new-vehicle-sales-in-europe-by-2035

    “Electric cars to account for all new vehicle sales in Europe by 2035”

    In ca. 15 years no ICE’s will be sold.

  35. Cloggie on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 3:52 pm 

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-environment-norway-autos/norway-powers-ahead-over-half-new-car-sales-now-electric-or-hybrid-idUSKBN1ES0WC

    Norway – Sales e-vehicle/hybrid

    2017 – 52%
    2016 – 40%

    100% probably achieved before the intended 2025.

    Windenergy began in Denmark, is now worldwide.
    Norway and e-vehicles same story.

  36. Davy on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 4:05 pm 

    Nederdummy, how many people are in Norway and Denmark? The way you talk I could say San Fransisco invented the IT. Get real.

  37. Cloggie on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 4:17 pm 

    I agree meathead that America will be lagging behind Western Europe, like Nigeria and Mexico.

    On a positive note, in a post-dollar-reserve currency America not that much fossil fuel will be burned anyway, so the transition will be a less pressing issue, CO2-wise.

  38. Boat on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 4:34 pm 

    Clog

    The prices of renewables for most of the world just became viable in the last couple of years. The EU, Japan etc who have much higher prices per btu naturally spent more to get less. Thank you for your sacrifices. But no lagging smart investing.
    Let’s not forget the fear of Russia cutting your ass off spurred the deployment of wind and solar before normally necessary.

  39. Cloggie on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 4:51 pm 

    Again boat, energy is not inherently more expensive in Europe than elsewhere. The tax makes the difference.

    Furthermore, NOBODY in Europe is afraid of or sees a threat in Russia, apart from the professional war mongers of the North-Atlantic Terrorist Organization (NATO). Russia is no danger to world peace, Washington is.

    “Thank you for your sacrifices. But no lagging smart investing.”

    No need to thanks us, boat. We in Europe will own the successors of Anglo oil majors, namely Vestas, Dong, Siemens, van Oord, Sif, etc.

    The Anglo Seven Sisters will be replaced by the European Seven Brothers. Europe will become the epi-center of the new energy age.

  40. Boat on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 5:33 pm 

    Clog

    You are NATO. Every sanction from the EU including more to come from the EU came from the EU. Every country makes their own decision. You play these political untruths for whatever reason. I don’t see Russia as a threat, or the US or the EU or China. Small trade wars, conflict areas, sure, but nothing serious.

  41. Anonymouse1 on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 5:48 pm 

    Boatietard

    You are RETARDO. You have no idea what NATO is, where or what Russia, the EU or China are either. For you, a trip to wall-mart is an world of wonders, or anytime you leave your mobile home park really.

  42. Boat on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 6:06 pm 

    Clog

    You need to Google 30 years of wind policy… lessons learned by Denmark.
    Taxes my ass. Massive subsidies more like it. Why? 90 percent dependant on imports. A success story you don’t need to spin.

  43. Boat on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 6:12 pm 

    Amouse

    I know per capita those Russians make about the same as Mexicans. I fear neither. What a leader. Like N Korea they have bells and whistles while their good people suffer.

  44. MASTERMIND on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 6:14 pm 

    UC Davis Peer Reviewed Study: It Will Take 131 Years to Replace Oil with Alternatives (Malyshkina, 2010)
    http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es100730q

    University of Chicago Peer Reviewed Study: predicts world economy unlikely to stop relying on fossil fuels (Covert, 2016)
    https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jep.30.1.117

    Solar and Wind produced less than one percent of total world energy in 2016 – IEA WEO 2017
    https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2017.pdf

    Fossil Fuel Share of Global Energy since 1990 – BP 2017
    https://imgur.com/k7VecMq

    Renewable energy ‘simply won’t work’: Top Google engineers
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/11/21/renewable_energy_simply_wont_work_google_renewables_engineers/

    Top scientists show why powering US using 100 percent renewable energy is a delusional fantasy
    http://energyskeptic.com/2017/big-fight-21-top-scientists-show-why-jacobson-and-delucchis-renewable-scheme-is-a-delusional-fantasy/

    At this rate, it’s going to take nearly 400 years to transform the energy system
    https://www.technologyreview.com/s/610457/at-this-rate-its-going-to-take-nearly-400-years-to-transform-the-energy-system/

    The Curse of Energy Efficiency
    https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2018/02/26/Energy-Efficiency-Curse/

    IEA Sees No Peak Oil Demand ‘Any Time Soon’
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/iea-sees-no-peak-oil-demand-any-time-soon-1488816002

  45. MASTERMIND on Sun, 18th Mar 2018 6:58 pm 

    US training Syria militants for false flag chemical attack as basis for airstrikes – Russian MoD

    https://www.rt.com/news/421589-us-preparing-syria-provocations-airstrikes/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *