“I think it’s an unwise idea,” Diamond told CTV’s Your Morning on Monday. She suggests the plan is postponing and diverting money and effort from solving the problem in a sustainable way, by opting instead for a quick-fix measure that will only speed up global warming. She also points out that the icebergs are likely to melt and break apart while they’re being dragged through the Indian Ocean to Dubai.
“This is a stopgap measure with dubious success,” she said.
The U.A.E.’s National Advisor Bureau, which is behind the iceberg plan, argues that it will generate billions of litres of fresh water that would otherwise melt and disperse into the ocean. The company also suggests an iceberg off the coast of Dubai would create a microclimate to cause more rain, and that icebergs will ease the U.A.E.’s reliance on water desalination plants.
But Diamond says the presence of an iceberg may actually create more problems for ocean life along the route to Dubai.
“Locally, it will create a zone of very cold fresh water in an oceanic system which is not friendly… for the animals and the plants living in the region,” she said.
She also points out that the fleet of ships necessary to haul an iceberg would likely burn a great deal of fossil fuels, which will only contribute to the melting of the polar ice caps through global warming.
“The dirtiest fuel available is saved for ocean-going ships,” she said. “And why are these icebergs available for towing? Because of climate change.”
Diamond acknowledges the extreme water stress in U.A.E. and surrounding region, where approximately five per cent of the world’s population relies on one per cent of the world’s fresh water supply. Some estimates suggest the region will run out of water in as little as 15 years.
She adds that Dubai only adds to that problem, because wealthy oil and gas billionaires have built it into a “very elaborate, water-rich city which is completely unsustainable. It’s true Disney land.”
Diamond says there’s only one clear solution to the water problem in the U.A.E. “Reduce your demand,” she said. “Get a handle on it.”
Other countries, including Canada, have used icebergs for drinking water. However, none have been so bold as to haul them great distances from their origin points at the poles.
According to a National Advisor Bureau promotional video, the move will also drive tourism, with many flocking to Fujairah to watch the icebergs come in.
The video makes some bold claims about the possible outcomes of the project, including the suggestion that it will “bring the ancient greenery back” and turn the U.A.E. into a lush paradise.
It also shows polar bears (from the Arctic) and penguins (from the Antarctic) hitching a ride on the iceberg, so perhaps more research is necessary before the project actually gets underway.


Anonymouse on Tue, 13th Jun 2017 7:38 pm
I concur with Professor Diamonds assessment.
It sounds like a very Dubaious idea to me….
makati1 on Tue, 13th Jun 2017 7:41 pm
Desperation breeds wild ideas. Also stupidity.
Anonymouse on Tue, 13th Jun 2017 7:49 pm
Are you suggesting an entire western-styled city, complete with mega water-slides, indoor, artificial ski hills, gold courses and water fountains everywhere in the middle of a desert
was a bad idea? No way…..
DMyers on Tue, 13th Jun 2017 8:03 pm
Lucky for them Arabs, the Antarctic bergs are intrinsically freezing, even in warmer waters and climates. I think it takes a blowtorch to melt one, so that adds another energy burden to the situation. Don’t leave that out of your EROEI analysis for towing icebergs to the U.A.E.
DMyers on Tue, 13th Jun 2017 8:43 pm
Select the best answer
A one ton iceberg leaves the antarctic on its way to the U.A.E. in the Middle East. By the time it reaches its destination it will weigh
A. one ton
B. 1/2 ton
C. 1/4 ton
D. Couple of pounds
How much melt off of the berg during transit will be recaptured for later use?
A. All
B. Most
C. A little
D. None
Apneaman on Tue, 13th Jun 2017 9:02 pm
DMyers, it would not make it because 1 ton of ice is not very big volume wise.
Rick Bronson on Tue, 13th Jun 2017 10:03 pm
Why not?
When Northern countries can drill in Arctic for Oil, the tropical countries can drill in Antarctica for Water. For them, water is a precious source.
Hubert on Tue, 13th Jun 2017 10:09 pm
Idea isn’t so desperated. It was first suggested by Frank Hurbert in one of his novels. There’s also been number of short stories based on that idea.
Of course, the stupid white bitch from Canada can thumb her nose on the dirty Arabs while the Canadians ruin an area size of Idaho just to clear a hole for sand-oil. Why don’t that stupid bitch moan about her own country whording oil for American white trash.
Hubert on Tue, 13th Jun 2017 10:16 pm
Here you go, you worthless hypoctite white-privileged Canadian bitch.
https://www.nrdc.org/stories/dirty-fight-over-canadian-tar-sands-oil
Go Speed Racer on Tue, 13th Jun 2017 11:48 pm
Sheeeeitttt, half of it will be melted away by the time it arrives. AND the remaining half will be covered up with black carbon soot from the tugboat diesels.
NOW lets put on our Engineer thinking caps.
Because somebody forgot to tell those Arabs that 90% of the ice is below the water, where it puts out incredible drag.
AND the GD things are unstable. Icebergs can tumble as they melt, finding new center of buoyancy SO you try and tow it, and it tumbles over and knocks your ship upside down.
This has got to be some dumb PR stunt to convince their locals that help is on the way, when it aint.
HEY why are those Aaa-Rabs not smart enough to build some subterranean housing. It was depicted quite nicely in the original 1976 Star Wars movie.
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Lars_Homestead
If they would get a shovel and start digging, they could live comfortably in the cool underground shade.
Anonymouse on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 3:44 am
Ape, dont be do dense. The purpose of his little thought experiment was NOT to suggest trying to tow a paltry 1 ton iceberg from the poles to the equator would be a good idea. The idea, put forth, is how ‘lossy’ such a scam, I mean, scheme, would be. The ah-rabs try to rationalize this with the flimsy logic that all that fresh water would just be ‘wasted’ on the ocean anyhow. Strangely, though, the thought that a significant amount would be also be ‘wasted’ towing it thousands of kilometers though equatorial regions never occurred to them either.
Either way, Dubai is foolish venture and so is towing icebergs 1/2 way around the world trying to sustain it.
Dredd on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 5:00 am
Peak water, what peak water (Trump Tells Mayor Of Sinking U.S. Island Not To Worry About Climate Change).
Cloggie on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 5:26 am
Spend some time making some calculations comparing sea transport with local desalinization:
https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2017/06/14/towing-icebergs-to-the-emirates-for-drinking-water/
Towing an iceberg is a stupid idea, since 90% of the ice is under water, causing a lot of drag you can avoid by transporting the ice as water in a stream-lined oil-tanker, um… make that water-tanker.
Tentative conclusion calculation: it doesn’t make much difference in terms of energy cost (transport by ship = 2.1 kWh/m3, desalinization = 3 kWh/m3). But with rapidly declining cost of solar panels, abundant and predictable solar energy in the desert, zero cost of otherwise useless desert and the complete irrelevance of intermittency of solar irradiation (day/night) in case of pure water production, I would say that it makes more sense to stick to desalinization.
Solar irradiation ca. 6 kWh/m2/day
Assume conversion efficiency of 15% and you get 1 kWh electricity per m2.
So with 2 standard 160×100 cm panels of together $500,- (excluding converter and installation) you get 1 m3 pure water per day, for 30 years or 10,000 m3
Panel price will be halved by 2020.
peakyeast on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 5:54 am
One should think there was enough sunlight in Dubai to facilitate sun-driven destillation-condensations sites located in the ocean.
But obviously this solution is tooo easy, permanent and cheap.
Cloggie on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 6:01 am
So with 2 standard 160×100 cm panels of together $500,- (excluding converter and installation) you get 1 m3 pure water per day, for 30 years or 10,000 m3
should read:
So with 2 standard 160×100 cm panels of together $500,- (excluding converter and installation) you get 3 m3 pure water per day, for 30 years or 30,000 m3 in these 30 years.
Hello on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 6:18 am
Funny. Maybe 30 years ago I read this in a Donald Duck comic. Uncle Scrooge moved icebergs to the desert for irrigation.
deadlykillerbeaz on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 6:41 am
Couldn’t they build a water pipeline from the Himalayas over to Dubai? It’s all downhill from Himalayas. The Romans could, the original water movers.
Mt. Everest water would sell better than water from Antarctica.
It would be peak water for real.
Cloggie on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 6:47 am
Greenhouses are a near perfect solution for the Gulf, provided you can control solar irradiation with sun shields:
http://www.thearabweekly.com/Economy/658/Urban-farming-a-solution-for-Gulf-countries
It is a good way to keep water usage at a minimum, by keeping it indoors.
You only need 25 liters of water in the desert to “get a tree started”:
https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2017/05/22/land-life-company-desert-reforestation-with-cocoon/
Here another promising approach: feeding seawater to greenhouses and let the water evaporate within the greenhouse:
http://www.globalwaterforum.org/2012/05/28/seawater-greenhouse-a-new-approach-to-restorative-agriculture/
No need to feed the salty brine resulting from conventional desalinization back in the sea at the cost of marine life.
q on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 7:01 am
Strange that this is not Elon Musk’s project.
Ghung on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 11:36 am
Elon Musk wants to drag those icebergs to Mars.
Larry Blakely on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 12:12 pm
Tow icebergs with a very large barge (or a large number of smaller barges) covered with PV panels, propelled by electric motors.
Go Speed Racer on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 1:07 pm
Put the PV panels directly onto the iceberg.
Add propellor motors. And don’t forget
put a wheel-house on top of the iceberg, for the
for the Captain.
onlooker on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 2:01 pm
haha, the cornucopia solutions are becoming ever more ridiculous and desperate
Apneaman on Wed, 14th Jun 2017 2:17 pm
Go Speed Racer, your question to clog yesterday about carb-less bread?
I’ve been into that stuff for decades. I’ll just recommend this one site run by a smart dude. From recipes to scientific info it has pretty much everything or a link to it.
http://www.marksdailyapple.com/
happy hunting
Cloggie on Thu, 15th Jun 2017 2:56 am
Put huge sails on these icebergs and transport them fossil free, environmentally correct to the Gulf.