Page added on January 3, 2017
In a few days, Rex Tillerson, chairman and CEO of ExxonMobil (2.3mn b/d of oil produced in 2015) that “has vast experience at dealing successfully with all types of foreign governments”[1] should be appointed US secretary of state. I believe once in office, Donald Trump, who wants to focus on America, could send Rex Tillerson, who was awarded the Order of Friendship by Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, to strike a deal on Crimea, before the EU can even reconsider its sanctions, which are now valid until July 31, allowing ExxonMobil to restart, ahead of the competition, Russian upstream projects currently on hold.
In Saudi Arabia, the Saud family wants to launch an initial public offering (IPO) this year for 5% of Saudi Aramco, the biggest oil company (10.1mn b/d of oil produced in 2015) for more than $100bn while implementing the 0.5mb/d production cut agreed at the November 30 Opec meeting. Remember, Saudi Aramco was partially owned by ExxonMobil from 1948 to 1978…
In Russia, oil companies will also have to implement the 0.3mn b/d cut decided on December 10 between Opec and non-Opec countries. The biggest Russian oil company (4.1m b/d of oil produced in 2015), Rosneft[2] headed by Igor Sechin, former Russian deputy prime minister from 2008 until 2012, will have to implement a cut of around 0.1mn b/d[3]. Remember, Rosneft is 19.75% owned by BP (1.1mb/d of oil produced in 2015) formerly the Anglo-Persian Oil Company that started with an oil discovery in Persia in 1908 and is now one of ExxonMobil global competitors…
By implementing those cuts, those two national companies should maintain the $50/b floor to oil prices in 2017. ExxonMobil could therefore enjoy higher oil prices while producing at full capacity!

Some interesting questions are still pending for 2017:
We’re gearing up for a volatile New Year with much “above ground risk” right downtown in Washington! Stay tuned!
28 December 2016
Thierry Bros
4 Comments on "2017: The Year of the Oil Majors"
rockman on Tue, 3rd Jan 2017 2:23 pm
Good enough but the missed a big part of the upside Big Oil has and will continue to benefit from: low oil/NG prices. Yes, low prices cut their revenue stream. So what? These are public companies that have no problem servicing their debt. Stock prices fell for a while? Good news again: more opportunity for their stock buy back programs that have been underway for years. Except with the oil price collapse those purchases cost them a good bit less.
But the truly giddy feelings by Big Oil from the bargain basement prices they’ve been (and will continue) paying for PROVED PRODUCING oil and NG reserves. Remember the primary goal of every public company, Big and Little, is replacing its previous year’s produced reserves. For the most part that is how their stock values are set.
Proved Producing reserves have been selling for $12 to $20 per bbl and around $1/MCF. That is a much lower price then most operators have spent drilling for reserves for many years. And beyond price remember ExxonMobil et al produce so much each year it’s impossible to develop replace by drilling alone.
We’re probably in the middle of the largest fossil fuel transfer in history. Imagine the profit potential years down the road from these low cost acquisitions when prices increase.
After all they are already profitable at today’s prices otherwise the deals would not have been made in the first place.
GregT on Wed, 4th Jan 2017 2:02 am
Meet the new Boss, same as the old Boss, on steroids.
kanon on Wed, 4th Jan 2017 7:59 am
rockman: “And beyond price remember ExxonMobil et al produce so much each year it’s impossible to develop replace by drilling alone.”
I was thinking Rex T had the assignment of saving Exxon with a big Russia oil deal, not just a renewal of the arctic circle exploration.
jjhman on Wed, 4th Jan 2017 11:58 am
It’s hard for me not to think that KSA is eager to sell shares in Aramco because they know something about it’s future value that they are not telling.
Remember years ago on The Oil Drum when there were some serious, well documented, descriptions regarding the depletion of Ghawar?
What would be the value of Aramco stock if Ghawar’s decline in production could not be made up by the dregs of oil fields that SA is now bringing on line?
If Aramco’s future production cannot match Ghawar, either in quantity or cost, it’s over for the kingdom. I’d sell too in that case.