Royal Dutch Shell Plc and Exxon Mobil Corp. are the international oil companies most exposed to violence in the Niger River delta that has cut Nigeria’s output and fueled a rally in global crude prices, according to Rystad Energy.
Shell and Exxon have the most production in vulnerable parts of the oil-rich region — onshore or near the coast, according to Per Magnus Nysveen, senior partner and head of analysis at the Oslo-based consultant. Shell is losing almost all of the 50,000 barrels a day it pumped in the delta last year, he said. That’s about a quarter of its output in the country. Exxon pumped 145,000 barrels a day last year — about half its Nigeria total — from shallow-water fields that could also be targeted, Nysveen said.
The delta has been rocked by attacks since February that have cut Nigeria’s output to the lowest in almost three decades. A previous outbreak of violence abated in 2009 after the then government offered pardons and monthly stipends to fighters willing to disarm. President Muhammadu Buhari has reduced those payments as part of an anti-corruption drive, prompting militants, now calling themselves The Niger Delta Avengers, to retaliate.
In February, Shell declared force majeure — a legal clause that allows it to stop shipments without breaching contracts — after militants blew up a pipeline feeding the Forcados terminal, which typically exports about 200,000 barrels a day from multiple producers. Shell’s deep-water Bonga field hasn’t been affected by the attacks.
“We continue to monitor the security situation in our operating areas in the Niger Delta and are taking all possible steps to ensure the safety of staff and contractors,” a Shell spokesman said by e-mail. “We do not wish to go into details. Our operations are continuing.”
Qua Iboe
Exxon’s Qua Iboe terminal, which handled 342,000 barrels a day last year, may also face disruptions because of its vulnerable onshore location or if fields that supply it come under attack, Nysveen said.
“There is a risk that these Avengers will now start to be more active,” in the shallow waters which is “a little outside the area where they’re normally operating,” Nysveen said by phone.
“Production activities continue,” Exxon said by e-mail, adding that it has “plans in place to assure the security of our personnel and assets.”
Deep-Water Unaffected
Shell began a divestment program in 2009 which saw it and partners Total SA and Eni SpA pull out of many of the blocks that feed the Forcados terminal, Gail Anderson, research director at Wood MacKenzie, said by phone. “The insecurity in that region no doubt played a part in that,” she said.
The heaviest toll is being paid by the Nigerian National Petroleum Corp., which is losing 200,000 barrels a day, Nysveen said. The state enterprise produced 580,000 barrels a day last year from onshore and shallow waters in the delta, he said.
Deep-water areas, where Shell and Exxon have significant operations, have so far been unaffected. “Nigeria will become increasingly reliant on that production if we see an escalation of violence,” Anderson said. The country pumped about 35 percent of oil or liquids from deep-water sites before the violence, she estimates.
The International Energy Agency estimates Nigeria’s oil output declined to 1.62 million barrels a day in April, a 10 percent drop from last year.
“In the worst case scenario, Nigeria may lose more than one million barrels of production,” Nysveen said.


Truth Has A Liberal Bias on Sat, 21st May 2016 12:36 pm
Nigeria is reported by some to be under a million barrels a day. Soon to be headed for zero. Add another country to the list of failed states. Venezuela isn’t far behind either and their problems won’t be solved by a new political party in power. Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador are pretty much the political equivalent of 13th century England but instead of Dukes and Barons it’s gangsters and coke lords. Mexico ain’t far behind. I can’t wait until USA experiences wave upon wave of unregulated mass migration from the South just as Europe is experiencing from MENA. All you fat lazy retarded ‘Merikans are gonna get a lesson in having your teeth kicked in and someone taking over your property. I’ll just laugh my ass off at you losers.
Davy on Sat, 21st May 2016 12:45 pm
Dumbass liberal bias, does ya think the southern masses won’t head up to Montreal? Your portfolio is toast soon and that is all you are living off. You are completely unprepared except for some guns and ammo you boast about but that is not enough. You are SCREWED, BLUED, AND TATOOED. You are oblivious to your coming end!
Truth Has A Liberal Bias on Sat, 21st May 2016 1:06 pm
lol Davy you’re a fuckng retard. You don’t know shit about me. I have 267 acres on a mountain hillside, a half million in the market that can be liquid (that means cash) at the press of a button on my iPhone (that’s why I read charts and follow the trends) and I have a enough guns and amo to outfit a platoon. I couldn’t give a rats fucking ass if the hordes head to Montreal. I hope they do. Doens’t impact me one fucking bit. So you’ll have to come up with something better than that retard. I hope the staving hordes kick your teeth in and fuck you with a broomstick.
Davy on Sat, 21st May 2016 2:50 pm
Liberal dumbass if things are so great why are you so upset? Sounds like you are full of shit and a lie. You don’t have shit but a big mouth. LOL LOL
JuanP on Sat, 21st May 2016 4:15 pm
Truth, Your 12:36 comment makes absolutely no sense. You have a seriously wandering mind. I was LOL while reading that thing. You go from Nigeria to Venezuela, then Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador, back in time and across the ocean to 13th Century Britain, then on to today’s Mexico and the USA. All that in one paragraph!
I am impressed, but I have no idea what you meant or where trying to say. I also have absolutely no idea what your comment has to do with the article or anything else.
JuanP on Sat, 21st May 2016 4:17 pm
Truth, Dang! I forgot Europe and the MENA region! 😉
JuanP on Sat, 21st May 2016 4:20 pm
On the subject, I will say that IMO Nigeria is collapsing exponentially and I expect the situation there to continue deteriorating on and off for the foreseeable future.
Anonymous on Sat, 21st May 2016 4:25 pm
Maybe if ‘Nigeria’s’ oil were actually owned and controlled by, I dont know, Nigerians maybe?, there would a lot less, if any violence. Jewberg of course, treats Nigeria’s oil as if its Exxons oil and money, and that, lies at the heart of the problem. There are a lot of Nigerians that are not happy about the theft of their resources by uS and allied oil corporations, and even less happy about the enormous environmental damage the uS(and friend) inflict doing it. And that doesn’t even get into the uS backed death squads who job it is to eliminate anyone that remotely troubles uS oil extraction efforts.
Not hard to see why the uS was in such a hurry to offer to help ‘rescue’ all those Nigerian girls a while back. Its all about pretexts to place military assets and ‘advisors’ nearby, to help protect uS resource extraction facilities from local opposition.
Truth Has A Liberal Bias on Sat, 21st May 2016 4:49 pm
@ DAvy. I’m not upset. I think you’re a fucking retard but my mood is quite fine. you have nothing but straw dog arguments like ‘why are you upset (I’m not). This site is a fucking echochamber for retards. @ JuanP- I can talk about anything I fucking want…. when one is listing a series of failed and failing states in relation to an article about Nigeria it is appropriate to present the global context. You’re another fucking retard. Get back to picking bottles you fucking reprobate.
onlooker on Sat, 21st May 2016 4:54 pm
“There are a lot of Nigerians that are not happy about the theft of their resources by uS and allied oil corporations, and even less happy about the enormous environmental damage the uS(and friend) inflict doing it. And that doesn’t even get into the uS backed death squads who job it is to eliminate anyone that remotely troubles uS oil extraction efforts.” So true. Of course using military jargon the Nigerians are collateral damage in the War for Oil(Not War on Terrorism). The whole friggin planet was just collateral damage. Or in economic jargon “an externality”
Truth Has A Liberal Bias on Sat, 21st May 2016 5:06 pm
theft of Nigerian oil by US? Last time I checked the Nigerian Gov sold a lease to a leading politician for a few 100 grand then the politician sold it to Shell for a couple billion. The only people stealing from Nigeria is Nigerians. ANyone who thinks “merika steals oil from Nigeria is an idiot. You guys have all these conspiracies in your head and you hand on your dick as you circle jerk to doomer porn. Losers. I made over $50,000 in dividends in 2015. If the market goes tits up I can be liquid at the press of a button. You losers can take a long hard suck on my ass. You’ll all be dead 3 days after the trucks stop running. I’ll be in my mountain retreat and living well. you guys are just a bunch of chumps. No hopes what so ever. You’ll all be among the first to die once collapse starts.
onlooker on Sat, 21st May 2016 5:15 pm
Yeah right fucktard, Truth. You will be there in the Mountain retreat pissing in your pants as the hordes approach. Your money idiot will not be worth nothing once the Collapse gets started. Just like your ammo and your arrogant piss off attitude probably has you living like a loner prepper thinking you can fend them all off. You will die just like you live alone. Nobody will probably miss you anyway douchebag.
Truth Has A Liberal Bias on Sat, 21st May 2016 5:52 pm
@onlooker, nope. you’re wrong. my stock will go up once the collapse starts. I don’t live a lone either. another straw dog argument. I have a large family. you fucking retards are pathetic. You just make shit up as you go. this pathetic site is a circle jerk echo chamber for dom porn losers with no chance of survival. I bet most of you can’t run 2 miles without puking. get back to your video games you fucking warrior.
GregT on Sat, 21st May 2016 6:01 pm
You know you’re a fucktard when, one of the least confrontational, most level head posters on this board calls you a fucktard.
JuanP on Sat, 21st May 2016 8:14 pm
TruthHALB “I have a large family.” I believe you have a very big since there is an inverse relation between the intelligence and education of a person and the number of kids they have. My bet is every member of your family has more than 12 kids! LOL!
But you are a total failure of a human being through and through.
Davy on Sat, 21st May 2016 8:19 pm
Truth, I am not impressed with braggarts especially when they brag about their money. The amount of money you mentioned is pretty lame for bragging anyway. Now your mountain retreat impresses me. Why not let us in on your doomstead arrangement. I am always looking for pointers. Doomsteads are cool money ain’t.
makati1 on Sat, 21st May 2016 8:19 pm
Truth, you better learn that only the real truth is the way to go here. Anyone can claim anything, but if you post for long enough, any inconsistencies become obvious. There are some sharp minds here that remember what you claimed, for years.
I could claim to have 5,364 acres of prime farmland in the US and millions gambled in the Market Casino, but that would be a lie and, sooner or later, I would post something that would prove it a lie. Tell the truth all the time. Then you don’t have to worry about what lie you told to whom.
makati1 on Sat, 21st May 2016 8:21 pm
As for Exxon and Shell, they deserve what is coming. The end of their Imperial sponsored pillaging of the 3rd world.
JuanP on Sat, 21st May 2016 8:21 pm
Truth, I don’t understand what you meant by “go back to picking bottles”. Are you referring to the coastal cleanups I have mentioned in the past that I take part in and the trash bottles I pick up and then recycle? Is that a metaphor? Or is that a saying from your area?
Anonymous on Sat, 21st May 2016 9:52 pm
Im not sure what the connection is between that fellows mountain hidey-hole and Jewbergs propaganda here. Clearly he is not familiar with the concept of creating, or buying off the local elite. Who then, turn around, and using ‘accepted business practices’ (ie western\uS ones), ‘sell’, or ‘lease’ the resources off to the lowest bidder. The use of western legal frameworks and practices is there too make it all look ‘legit’. On paper at least.
The practice is an old one. Same idea as buying Manhattan island for a few handfuls of colored beads and some whiskey. Perfectly legal and binding contract of sale and all that. That was a clearly a case of Indians stealing from other Indians right? It was obviously all the indians fault for sending a corrupt and easily bought off representative to the manhattan island negotiations in the first place.
Kenz300 on Tue, 24th May 2016 1:15 pm
5 Huge Climate Success Stories 10 Years After the Release of Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’
http://ecowatch.com/2016/05/24/al-gore-inconvenient-truth/
Big Oil Could Have Cut CO2 Emissions In 1970s — But Did Nothing
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/big-oil-emissions_us_573c9d81e4b0aee7b8e8a046