How Non-Violence Protects The State

3 Comments on "How Non-Violence Protects The State"

PracticalMaina on Thu, 21st Apr 2016 2:57 pm 



Any time a minority filled community chooses violence, the result is usually a better armed more aggressive police, IMHO. Even if the violence is in response to a heavy handed police. The government loves to increase funding when people are not doing their jobs properly. Unless it is in something that benefits the people, like education.

theedrich on Fri, 22nd Apr 2016 3:23 am 



¿Why war?  To reduce population.  “Violence” is endemic to the human and other primates.  The above video, staged by a kind of unfunny leftist Alfred E. Neuman (of Mad Magazine), is, as usual, directed at the declining White race, not at proliferating darkies.  When the guest anarchist (the psychotic Dutchman, Gelderloos) speaks about India and Ghandi, he omits the invariably omitted fact that Britain lost that subcontinent because super-genosuicidist Winston Ill-Church had vastly reduced the male population of his own nation in two World Wars to the point that the Limeys no longer had the manpower to put down the Wog riots, of which Ghandi was merely the anodyne spokesman.

The threat to the earth today is not the disappearing White man, but the melanin-rich, fast-breeding rodents overwhelming what remains of suicidal Western civilization.  This is the menacing mastodon in the living room.

When the 2008 econo-breakdown happened, there were still lots of tricks (“tools,” in econo-blather) that the regime could use to chloroform the masses:  QE, ZIRP, the dollar as global reserve currency, the ability to balloon the national deficit to cancerous levels, not to mention all kinds of jabberwocky from the Fed and other citadels of Newspeak.  Today those tricks have been exhausted, and the only thing left is to try creative financing scams like Japan’s new “negative interest” loans.  Completely beside the utter lawlessness of the Ø regime (plus the narcotics superplague, crumbling U.S. infrastructure [e.g., Pb in the H2O, bridges past their shelf lives, …]), ISIL and the insane wars in Allahland, &c., &c.), the economy of the U.S. is on the verge of the final Great Depression.  The last time the U.S. found itself in such a state, it ensnared Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor so that we could jump-start the economy with World War.  Very likely the Clinton banshee (so popular among the plutocrats, academics and non-Whites) will repeat that pious massacre.  After all, she has already achieved success with her proxy murder of our ambassador in Benghazi, Libya.  What’s another war among friends?

Hardy Mann on Sun, 24th Apr 2016 5:52 am 



Finally we learn that Churchill started World Wars I and II, and that the US ensnared Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor!

What is that country whose name begins with a “G” somewhere in the middle of Europe? To think everyone was told that G was involved in the great European genocide! Prepostersous!