Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on March 7, 2016

Bookmark and Share

Total, Eni Bet On New Finds As Rivals Cut Costs In Oil Downturn

Business

As oil firms slash billions of dollars of investment to survive the market crash, France’s Total and Italy’s Eni are making some of the smallest cuts, gambling in the hope of big-ticket discoveries that will reward them when prices recover.

Both approaches carry risks. Intensive exploration programmes mean higher costs and lower profits in the short term, with no guarantee of finding new fields. But firms that scale back too far may damage future growth prospects, forcing them to splash out on acquisitions.

Wood Mackenzie analysts expect this year’s exploration spending to fall to just half of a peak of $95 billion reached in 2014. Against that background, Total’s 21 percent cut is among the smallest.

The French company, which pursued a “high risk-high reward” strategy under late chief executive Christophe de Margerie, will still spend $1.5 billion on exploration this year, including off Myanmar, Argentina and Nigeria.

“Our new exploration manager will be able to explore most of the prospects he wanted to,” Total Chief Financial Officer, Patrick de la Chevardiere, told journalists last month.

“We’re giving him a certain budget which leaves him sufficient flexibility to explore what he wants to explore.”

Eni has not published separate exploration budget numbers for 2016 but said it will keep seeking new resources in mature areas where it can use existing infrastructure and know-how to lower costs.

The Italian group became the first big oil firm last year to cut its dividend in order to navigate the market downturn.

Its bet on finding new resources was boosted last year when it made the bumper Zohr gas discovery offshore Egypt, the biggest ever in the Mediterranean and its fifth large oil and gas find in just three years, giving it the best track record in reserve replacement among majors.

Resource Hunt

With oil prices down around 70 percent since mid-2014, the temptation to cuts exploration costs is strong. But the nature of the energy business means companies must constantly add new resources as producing assets gradually run out of oil and gas.

“In a downturn, exploration is about securing access to opportunities and high quality acreage at very low cost,” said Stephane Foucaud, managing director of institutional research at advisory firm First Energy.

Those with tighter pockets will have to rely on adding new resources through acquisitions further down the line, a more expensive option.

“Many (oil majors) consider that buying smaller companies would now be an investment with a higher return than if the majors were doing the frontier exploration themselves,” said Eric Oudenot, a partner specialising in oil and gas at The Boston Consulting Group.

Europe’s biggest oil major, Shell, has led the way through its $53 billion acquisition of BG Group, a gas producer with exposure to attractive deepwater licences offshore Brazil that will help increase Shell’s proven reserves by 25 percent.

Its own investment cuts have already made an impact on the business. Its reserve replacement ratio (RRR), a metric used to reflect new reserves added relative to the amount produced, was negative in 2015 for the first time in around 12 years. By comparison, Eni’s RRR was 148 percent in 2015, not including the impact of the Zohr discovery.

“While we’re not entirely comfortable with a negative number, it’s not the most important thing today,” Shell Chief Financial Officer Simon Henry told reporters last month.

British oil major BP saw its RRR fall to 61 percent last year, from 63 percent in 2014 and 129 percent in 2013. It said the weaker ratio was a direct result of the low number of final investment decisions and reduced activity in the United States.

BP is one of the companies which has severely slashed its exploration spend. Its budget has shrunk to around $1 billion from $2.4 billion spent in 2015, a fall of nearly 60 percent.

The oil major was badly burnt last year by around $3 billion in upstream write-offs, many due to unsuccessful exploration campaigns.

“(Exploration is) the one thing I think that we can phase, and we’ll just be very cautious and careful around that,” said BP Chief Executive Bob Dudley on the company’s full-year earnings call in early February.

Norwegian oil major Statoil, which has slashed exploration spending by around 31 percent to $2 billion this year, said it was already on the lookout for acquisitions to build its exploration portfolio.

“We are quite active now in building a new global exploration portfolio and there is no doubt now is a good time to do it,” Chief Executive Eldar Saetre told Reuters last month.

Wood Mackenzie analysts say low exploration levels will feed through to lower production in 10 to 15 years’ time.

“Exploration is the easiest cost to reduce for a management team,” said BCG’s Oudenot. “It only bites you back a few years later.”

RIGZONE



6 Comments on "Total, Eni Bet On New Finds As Rivals Cut Costs In Oil Downturn"

  1. penury on Mon, 7th Mar 2016 5:10 pm 

    Maybe there is no place left to look, there will come a time when no matter how hard you look or how much you spend ITS GONE

  2. Truth Has A Liberal Bias on Mon, 7th Mar 2016 7:28 pm 

    Statoil has been exploring for oil for the better part of several decades and about once a decade they find a couple weeks worth of global consumption. They’re done. In a few years a severe decline in global C+C production will be obvious to all. It’s well past last call. Drink up and go home boys.

  3. twocats on Mon, 7th Mar 2016 8:55 pm 

    I wonder if a full RRR chart for 2015 (and recent years) would be scary or not. Eni was 148% which is noted as “the best”. BP was considered poor at 61%. And these would include acquired assets (other companies former reserves).

    Does it really take 10 to 15 years to bring an oil discovery (non-shale) to market?

  4. Kenz300 on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 9:38 am 

    That money would be better spent on transitioning the company to an “ENERGY” company by adding wind and solar assets to their portfolio………

    Fossil fuels are poisoning the planet…….. it is time for the fossil fuel companies to change or go broke…..

  5. rockman on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 10:25 am 

    “Does it really take 10 to 15 years to bring an oil discovery (non-shale) to market?”. DW GOM can take 5+ years from the date of discovery by the first well drilled. International can take longer.
    DW Brazil is taking a very long time to come on. That’s why Petrobra was hurting even before the oil price collapse. You can spend much $BILLION drilling exploratory wells that find billions of bbls of oil. But you don’t generate cash flow until you spend even more $billions over many years to get to the production phase.

    From Oct 2015:

    World’s largest junk issuer has most of its debt due by 2021.

    For much of the past year, Petroleo Brasileiro SA’s unrelenting rout has pushed down bond prices to new lows day after day.

    Now, Deutsche Bank AG is finally starting to see value in the state-controlled oil producer’s debt.

    The strategy is simple: buy its $3.35 billion of notes due in 2017 — whose yields have more than tripled to about 8.7 percent — because Petrobras will have no problem paying its obligations over the next few years without government support.

    But beyond that, yields still aren’t high enough to compensate for the risks tied to refinancing, the slump in oil and a weaker Brazilian currency, Deutsche Bank’s Eduardo Vieira wrote in a report dated Oct. 7.

  6. geopressure on Tue, 8th Mar 2016 12:08 pm 

    I don’t know, I was kinda thinking that Petrobras has major issues…

    Huge Corruption Scandals at home with regards to bribery, & they got screwed on a refinery deal & lost a pile of cash…
    Poor Management
    Explosion in Pasadena Refinery this weekend just took out that refinery & it will be decommissioned for a LONG time…
    They have zero luck with refineries
    & worst of all, Obama is trying to destroy them…

    I think oil is going up this year, in a big way… However, I was buying PBR Puts yesterday… I could be wrong, but I think they are in a bind…


    The bad thing about drilling in Deepwater Brazil is that you have pay for drilling in Deepwater Brazil…

    If they would only migrate their exploratory efforts to the U.S. GoM & Operate under their U.S. Subsidiary, then they Federal Government would allow PBR to subtract 100% of all deepwater exploration cost directly from the bottom line of their Federal Income Taxes Owed… That’s right, the U.S. Government pays for all deepwater wells on the U.S. GoM… If you have the money to finance it upfront, you get all those wells for free… Thanks to some tax loopholes from the late 1990’s when Bill Clinton was trying figure out where he could get more oil from to maintain the illusion of an oversupplied market & keep oil prices down in the dirt… It was either incentivize Deepwater Exploration to that extent, or re-invade Iraq in order to develop the Kurdish Reserves…

    This is why Transocean & Noble get away with charging $1 Million U$D day rates on their drillships & semisubmersibles… Because Shell or Anadarko or LLOG, or whoever the Operator is, they are not ultimately liable for the cost anyway…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *