Page added on July 4, 2015
Oklahoma almost never used to have earthquakes. But in the last six years they’ve increased so much that last year the state surged past California as the most seismically active state in the continental U.S. Prior to 2009, the state averaged two quakes of greater than 3.0 magnitude annually. By 2014 that number had soared to 585, up from 109 in 2013.
The culprit? Scientists are convinced it’s the wastewater injection wells that have accompanied the explosion of fracking in that state during the same time period.
Oil and gas company New Dominion is Prague, Oklahoma’s biggest employer—and has been accused of causing damaging earthquakes from its wastewater injection wells. Photo credit: New Dominion
Now the Oklahoma Supreme Court has cleared the way for citizens to sue the oil and gas companies responsible for the wells. In a 7-0 decision, with two justices not voting, the court said that Sandra Ladra, a resident of Prague, Oklahoma, which was hit by a 5.6 magnitude earthquake on Nov. 5, 2011, could seek injuries for injuries she suffered in that tremor.
“On November 5, 2011, Appellant was at home in Prague, Oklahoma watching television in her living room with her family when a 5.0 magnitude earthquake struck nearby,” reads Ladra’s complaint. “Suddenly, Appellant’s home began to shake, causing rock facing on the two-story fireplace and chimney to fall into the living room area. Some of the falling rocks struck Appellant and caused significant injury to her knees and legs, and she was rushed immediately to an emergency room for treatment. She claims personal injury damages in excess of $75,000.”
The industry said that the Oklahoma Corporation Commission, which regulates the oil and gas industries and tends to be very friendly toward them, should deal with these cases. The state supreme court disagreed.
“The commission, although possessing many of the powers of a court of record, is without the authority to entertain a suit for damages,” the court found. “Private tort actions, therefore, are exclusively within the jurisdiction of district courts.”
That decision also clears the way for a second Prague citizen to sue for property damages. That plaintiff, Jennifer L. Cooper, is seeking class-action status, and if granted, tens of millions of dollars in damages could be awarded. Both plaintiffs are suing Tulsa-based New Dominion, which calls itself “the leader in harvesting hydrocarbons,” and the smaller Spess Oil Co. of Cleveland, Oklahoma.
“It is refreshing to see that the Oklahoma State Supreme Court ruling will not allow the oil and gas industry to skirt responsibility for the damage their earthquake-inducing practices have caused Oklahomans,” said Food & Water Watch organizer Matt Ohloff.
“We know oil & gas wastewater disposal wells are causing the increase in earthquakes in Oklahoma, and those suffering from the property, physical and psychological damage from these earthquakes should receive full rewards directly from the responsible parties—oil & gas. And while it is a major victory that these lawsuits will be allowed to move forward, what we ultimately need is for the Oklahoma state legislature and Oklahoma Governor to enact a moratorium on oil & wastewater disposal wells to stop the earthquakes from happening in the first place,” Ohloff continued.
The Prague earthquake was the strongest ever felt in Oklahoma and was followed in the next few days by two more tremors of 5.0 magnitude or greater, destroying half a dozen homes and damaging more than 170 others in the town of about 2,300 people and the surrounding area, where New Dominion is the largest employer. One of its three field offices is located in Prague.
Back in 2012, eight months after the damaging quakes, Jean Antonides, New Dominion’s vice president of exploration, said it was silly to think the company’s injection wells caused the quakes.
“That’s people watching too many Superman movies,” Antonides scoffed to Energy & Environment Daily. “Some individuals pick only the data that serves their purpose.”
He suggested the real cause of the quakes was heavy rains.
“When you have rainfall amounts of six inches over a few day period, these rainfalls cover a thousand square miles—that’s a lot of weight,” he said. “That much new weight—potentially trillions of tons—if it’s along or across a fault, can be enough to cause an earthquake. If you change the weight, relative near surface, across that fault—either reducing the weight on one side, loading up the other side or vice versa, that could be the trigger point.”
Scientists not employed by oil and gas companies have tied the increase in wastewater injection wells to increases in earthquakes. Image credit: Food & Water Watch
Other scientists not employed by oil and gas exploration companies don’t agree with his theory.
“Large areas of the U.S. that used to experience few or no earthquakes have, in recent years, experienced a remarkable increase in earthquake activity that has caused considerable public concern as well as damage to structures,” the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) said last year. “This rise in seismic activity, especially in the central U.S., is not the result of natural processes. Deep injection of wastewater is the primary cause of the dramatic rise in detected earthquakes and the corresponding increase in seismic hazard in the central U.S.”
With fossil fuel extraction booming in Oklahoma since the widespread use of fracking began around 2009, the state has been under pressure from oil and gas companies to downplay the connection between injection wells and earthquakes. For instance, in November 2013, University of Oklahoma president David Boren requested that state seismologist Austin Holland meet with billionaire Harold Hamm of Oklahoma city-based Continental Resources, who is known as the founding father of the U.S. fracking boom.
Bloomberg reported, ““Hamm requested that Holland be careful when publicly discussing the possible connection between oil and gas operations and a big jump in the number of earthquakes, which geological researchers were increasingly tying to the underground disposal of oil and gas wastewater, a byproduct of the fracking boom that Continental has helped pioneer.”
Boren called the meeting “purely informational,” but Holland said it was “just a little bit intimidating” and he subsequently dialed down making the connection publicly. However, state officials have been less and less able to deny the connection, as studies keep piling up making the connection both in Oklahoma and other states. Those studies provide ammunition for Ladra’s and Cooper’s attorneys as they are now cleared to press their cases in the courts.
8 Comments on "Citizens Can Sue Fracking Companies for Earthquake Damage, Says Oklahoma Supreme Court"
Makati1 on Sat, 4th Jul 2015 6:57 am
Another 2X4 slam to the face of fraking…
penury on Sat, 4th Jul 2015 1:18 pm
“Citizens Can Sue Fracking Companies for Earthquake Damage, Says Oklahoma Supreme Court” In OK the citizens can also p-ray for rain, Guess which one will give the best results.
rockman on Sat, 4th Jul 2015 4:25 pm
“It is refreshing to see that the Oklahoma State Supreme Court ruling will not allow the oil and gas industry to skirt responsibility for the damage their earthquake-inducing practices have caused Oklahomans”.
First and most important this absolutely nothing to do with frac’ng. It’s about water injection wells. Long before the recent frac’ng boom there have been BILLIONS of bbls of waste water (mostly salt water) pumped down OK injection wells.
Second, they must have some strange laws in OK: in Texas a landowner doesn’t need the approval of the state supreme court or anyone else to sue a company for any of that activity that causes damage. It just a matter of proving their case. Note was the OK SSC said: they can sue. Winning the suite is a different matter.
shallow sand on Sat, 4th Jul 2015 5:53 pm
Rock. It appears that the Defendant’s at the trial court level must have prevailed on a Motion to Dismiss or a Motion for Summary Judgment.
Story refers to homeowner as Appellant, so she apparently lost at trial court level, but appealed and was successful.
I think the Defendant’s she sued argued successfully at the trial court level that she had not exhausted all administrative remedies, presumably through the OK Corporation Commission, which regulates state oil and gas activities.
Concern here is that a few poorly designed/conceived SWD wells will cause extra problems for the thousands of SWD and INJ wells in OK (and elsewhere) that have never caused a problem, but will now be subject to even more stringent review than they already are.
The shale stuff has messed up stuff for conventional producers up and down the line. Here is yet another potential example.
shallow sand on Sat, 4th Jul 2015 5:55 pm
You are correct, the OK Supremes merely ruled she can sue. Case remanded back to trial court for further proceedings.
shallow sand on Sat, 4th Jul 2015 5:57 pm
If there is a problem with the SWD wells, wonder what happened at the permitting stage.
Our experience is that there is pretty stringent administrative review before a permit is issued, and we have to provide a lot of data with application.
Wonder if there was and error in the permitting process, or if operator was exceeding permitted pressures, rates, or maybe completed well in unpermitted zone?
apneaman on Sun, 5th Jul 2015 1:12 am
Texas fracking site that spilled 42,000 gallons of fluid into residential area hopes to reopen
http://rt.com/usa/267838-arlington-texas-fracking-accident/
rockman on Sun, 5th Jul 2015 8:24 am
Shallow – I’m pretty sure that the SWD well permit process in Texas (and all other states) doesn’t require either seismic or geologic analysis to determine if the well might be injecting close to a fault. Decades ago (i.e. Rocky Mtn. Arsenal) the potential to cause fault slippage/earth tremors was established.
But here’s the problem with any law suites in OK: there been increased tremor activity in the mid-continent for a good while including areas where no frac’ng has been done. Their best chance to win would be getting the courts to mandate a release/review of seismic data in the area of a suspected SWD well. If a fault is discovered they could possibly do a micro-seismic survey to prove that specific fault is moving.
Of course the most important info is missing from such articles: depth of the tremors. Shallow injection can’t cause deep seated tremors. But if they are above 10,000′ it would add some credibility those claims.