Page added on June 14, 2015
Recent cooperation and a concerted effort against coal consumption will usher in an era of dominance for one energy technology.
It’s not oil, natural gas, or even solar and wind (although these still have a part to play).
Instead, as the world transitions from the aggressive coal consumption left over from the industrial revolution, new technologies will transform how the world gets its power… and how investors make their money.
An example of this cooperation took place earlier this week, when U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz spoke at a summit held by the Edison Electric Institute.
The EEI is an association of publicly owned electric utility companies, and Moniz spoke about a new understanding between EEI-affiliated companies and the DOE.
Their agreement is a plan to accelerate the efficiency and distribution of plug-in electric vehicles throughout the U.S.
As of right now, here are the businesses where you’re able to charge an electric car…

Of course, there are still some independently owned charging stations — like the ones provided by Tesla — but otherwise, there’s so small a distribution of electric charging stations that electric cars are nothing more than a whisper in the auto industry.
That’s why Moniz convinced the EEI to pledge 10% of its fleet budget toward electric vehicles.
In doing so, the DOE hopes to lower greenhouse gas emissions and U.S. reliance on foreign oil, while utilities benefit from the added sales of electricity to PEV owners.
Add to these developments the growth in U.S. solar as promoted by Moniz, and in a few decades, coal will feel like a distant memory.
Solar’s growth in the U.S. has pretty much doubled every single year since 2009.
In the first quarter of 2015, solar accounted for 51% of new U.S. generating capacity, and the cost of panels has declined 80% in the last five years.
As solar and electric cars edge closer to parity with the status quo leaders in their respective industries, it’s only a matter of time before battery technology takes over as the ultimate source of power around the globe.
China Turns its Back on Coal
China is the world’s leading emitter of greenhouse gases, has an enormous population (1.357 billion), and relies heavily on coal for residential power and economic and industrial growth.
But as the Western world amps up pressure on Chinese leadership to curb its addiction to coal, it seems the country is willing to listen.
After Xi Jinping made an historic climate deal with President Obama in November, the country is already ahead of schedule with its transition out of coal.
According to the London School of Economics, Chinese greenhouse gas emissions will likely peak around 2025 (five years before the agreed-upon date) and will fall rapidly after that time.
Here’s why China is so far ahead of schedule…

The chart above illustrates China’s coal consumption over the last 30 years. After an exponential rise, the country has now seen a peak.
Of all the places in the world to turn its back on coal, I always thought China would be the last. But, alas, it seems coal is on its way out there, too.
Mark my words: Coal will be dead in China… and much quicker than you think, ushering in a new era for natural gas, wind, solar, and perhaps nuclear energy.
China has an abundance of natural gas reserves it could use to transition from coal into even cleaner technologies like wind, solar, and electric vehicles.
And once China makes these changes, battery technologies are going to become the new midstream of electricity production all over the world.
That means investors should take heed, and do so with haste.
Although I’ll always be an oil bull, I’m well aware that lithium is the next big commodity for investors.
Coal is done for, and lithium-ion batteries are the best solution we have to store electricity when the wind isn’t blowing, the sun isn’t shining, and when our cars get plugged into the wall instead of a gas station pump.
That’s why you’ve probably heard me call it “the oil of the future.”
Soon enough, lithium will be followed as closely on the market as oil is today, and because it is scarce, lithium prices are going to soar when demand for batteries ramps up over the next few years.
Investors who position themselves today will earn similar fortunes to those who invested in coal before the industrial revolution, oil in the early 20th century, and nuclear in the 1980s.
If you’re unsure of how to play this disruptive new trend, fear not. Sometime during this quarter or next, I’ll be sending a brand-new investment report that’ll detail the latest and greatest ways to take advantage of the lithium revolution.
Keep your eyes on your inbox for this report. In the meantime, I suggest you rid your portfolio of all things coal. It’s not coming back.
13 Comments on "Lithium, not oil and gas, the key investment for the future"
jjhman on Sun, 14th Jun 2015 1:06 pm
This looks like typical stock broker hype. Calling the current downturn is Chinese coal consumption the death of coal use is pure grandstanding. There is a current economic slowdown in China. Let’s wait until the Chinese economy accelerates and see what happens before calling it peak coal worldwide.
Plantagenet on Sun, 14th Jun 2015 1:26 pm
IN 2010 Obama issued an executive order that by 2015 all government vehicle purchases would be 100% EVs.
Here we are in 2015 and the percentage of EVs bought by the federal government is miniscule.
Its easy to make promises about EVs and the need for lithium, but don’t believe all the hype and promises from politicians.
Boat on Sun, 14th Jun 2015 2:50 pm
Stocks betting on coal will sit next to those betting on phone booths.
apneaman on Sun, 14th Jun 2015 3:18 pm
Losing Frozen Earth Could Cook the Planet
http://loe.org/shows/segments.html?programID=15-P13-00024&segmentID=1
apneaman on Sun, 14th Jun 2015 3:22 pm
A New Era Of Bogus Emissions Data
http://www.declineoftheempire.com/2015/06/a-new-era-of-bogus-emissions-data.html#comments
penury on Sun, 14th Jun 2015 3:45 pm
Let me see, Lithium is the energy of the future. Sorry batteries do9 not supply energy they store energy. Repeat that until you understand” energy must be created by a source, after it is created it may be stored in BATTERIES/ Lithium Ion Batteries do not supply energy. If the3y are your dream for the future I recommend that you invest 100 per cent of your money in them and wait for the energy to appear.
rockman on Sun, 14th Jun 2015 4:58 pm
“Mark my words: Coal will be dead in China… and much quicker than you think…”. Sure it is…any day now. LMFAO.
According the EIA China currently gets 93% of its energy from fossil fuels with 70% from coal. Excluding nuclear and hydro renewables now account for 0.3% of China’s energy source. Which clearly explains how China has made such huge PERCENTAGE gains in renewables: all they had to do is add 0.1% to claim a 50% increase. Now all they have to do to replace coal is increase those renewables 233X. So based on the rate of increase (in absolute terms…not percentages) it should take about as long for sea level to rise 100′ as for China to ditch coal.
No problamo.
Speculawyer on Sun, 14th Jun 2015 6:09 pm
Meh. Lithium is needed but not that much and it is available all over.
Cobalt is the mineral that is expensive and needs better sourcing.
Paul Herman on Sun, 14th Jun 2015 9:13 pm
Rockman,
More coal trains have been trundling on by to the west coast. And the beat goes on….
potterpaul
apneaman on Sun, 14th Jun 2015 9:44 pm
High Resolution Full Version of Chai Jing’s Under the Dome. A documentary investigation into China’s smog. Chai explains the what, where, and why of air pollution, and the effects it has had on her own life, and the life of her new born daughter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rh6NGNfBy8o
antaris on Sun, 14th Jun 2015 10:01 pm
Pen. Energy is not created. It can neither be created nor destroyed.
Solarity on Mon, 15th Jun 2015 10:03 am
“…Develop an electric vehicle by 2020 that’s as cheap as a gas-powered one…”
Cheap in terms of what? Purchase price, cost of operation, or overall productivity (EROEI). A lower purchase price may attainable, but the other two will probably always be trumped by the laws of thermodynamics:
If EnergySource => Work defines as 100% efficiency,
then EnergySource => Battery => Work is about 60% due to conversion loses.
Apneaman on Mon, 15th Jun 2015 11:28 am
Why Green Energy Is A False God!
http://www.reddit.com/r/collapse/comments/39wy9g/why_green_energy_is_a_false_god/