Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on May 6, 2015

Bookmark and Share

What the Future of Oil Drilling Will Look Like

What the Future of Oil Drilling Will Look Like thumbnail

The future of the U.S. oil industry may well be taking shape north of this town on 15 square miles of windswept prairie above the Bakken Shale. It’s about as far from the industry’s wildcatting heritage as is thinkable.

“Our idea was to build the world’s greatest oil factory,” says Chris Wright, the chief executive of Liberty Resources LLC. And if the U.S. oil industry is going to overcome several significant challenges, it may have to follow the lead of this small Denver-based company.

The U.S. oil industry boomed when crude oil prices were high, but has entered a world where low oil prices may be the norm for a while. Saudi Arabia says it won’t cut production to reduce supply, leaving U.S. companies vulnerable. After years of pell-mell development, these producers also face rising pressure from communities and regulators to be better neighbors.

“The correct focus in a price downturn is to focus on efficiency and cost mitigation, but it is much easier said than done,” says Cody Rice, a Houston-based senior research analyst for energy consultant Wood Mackenzie. “There are so many moving pieces that it is very difficult to do these things well.”

Mr. Wright’s oil factory is well-suited for this new world. It is focused on cutting operating costs and boosting output. And it is flexible, allowing oil output to be started and stopped—something that could be a big plus as volatile global crude prices require U.S. companies to adjust production levels.

Reducing truck traffic

On a frigid February evening, the project was beginning to take shape. The first three operational wells were flowing into a giant battery of storage tanks that will separate the oil from water. Nearby, a small drilling rig was putting the final touches on a $3.7 million saltwater disposal well, where wastewater will be piped for injection underground. A large earthmover was preparing the ground for a new pad where more than a dozen wells were to be drilled.

Notably absent were tanker trucks. Liberty Resources has spent $16.2 million building pipelines to deliver fresh water and send out natural gas and oil, greatly reducing the need for trucks. Another pipeline sends gas from its wells to drilling rigs and other machinery, cutting diesel consumption in half and reducing the number of fuel trucks required.

“Getting trucks off the road is one of the main drivers in controlling the costs,” says Chris Clark, the production manager. Trucking water for disposal, for example, can cost $1.75 a barrel, about 50 cents more than shipping water via pipeline, he says. Overall, pipeline usage helps Liberty make an additional $3 a barrel for oil, mostly from reduced costs but also because the company can more easily get its oil to locations where it brings in higher prices, he says. “We are spending more to make more,” Mr. Clark says.

ENLARGE

Reducing truck traffic is about more than just cutting costs, however. It also helps with community relations. “The No. 1 objection to industry’s presence is always trucks,” says George King, a consultant at Houston-based oil and natural-gas producer Apache Corp.

Liberty Resources, backed by private-equity firm Riverstone Holdings LLC, calls the project Stomping Horse. It is developing the nearly 10,000 acres as a unified project, rather than a collection of individual wells. When it’s done, the project likely will have cost more than $800 million and there will be 96 wells.

Building centralized infrastructure—pipelines, a disposal well, a tank battery—is expected to drive down operating expenses, Mr. Clark says. Because fewer workers are needed to operate the wells, field-personnel costs are down 34% this year, he says. “We’ll still make money at $50 a barrel,” he says. Even so, the company plans to take a break from producing oil until August, when it hopes prices will have rebounded and costs from oil-field-services companies will have fallen.

More-productive wells

To understand what is so unusual about Stomping Horse, it is necessary to understand the rapid rise of the Bakken Shale. In 2008, North Dakota generated a little more than 100,000 barrels of oil a day. That has risen tenfold. With oil prices high, speed was prized over efficiency. Development was chaotic and unplanned: Drill some wells, build some supporting infrastructure, use trucks to get water in and oil out, and often flare off gas.

ENLARGE

A couple of years ago, “people were racing around to secure acreage,” says John Harju, associate director of the Energy and Environmental Research Center at the University of North Dakota. That’s because the oil boom set off a land-leasing boom, and companies needed to drill and start producing oil or lose leases they spent hundreds of millions to acquire.

Today, companies “are going about this in a much more methodical way,” he says. He compares it to the difference between modern farming that cultivates thousands of acres with GPS-controlled John Deere machines and homesteading of a century ago.

While Liberty Resources has taken the concept furthest, others are also attempting to make their operations more factory-like. Continental Resources Inc., a large Oklahoma City-based oil and gas producer, has used centralized facilities for the past few years, though on a smaller scale. The company said in an email that it “will continue using it to boost operational efficiencies and reduce environmental impact.”

Joseph Kiesecker, the lead scientist for the Nature Conservancy, a New York-based environmental group, applauds the trend toward centralized infrastructure. “It makes both practical sense for the industry because it reduces their cost and it makes good environmental sense because it reduces the footprint for development,” he says. “Nobody is saying we shouldn’t develop these resources. We all turn the lights on. It is about just being smarter.”

There is another way that Stomping Horse is cutting-edge. Liberty intends to drill and frack all the wells for each 1,280-acre rectangle consecutively. The idea is to leave no square foot untouched by fractures, thus avoiding pressure imbalances that can make wells less productive.

Liberty’s Mr. Wright says this approach is producing considerably better-than-average wells. The downside is that the company needs to drill and frack 10 wells before it produces oil.

“It’s a lot of capital out before anything comes back,” he says. “But I think this is what people will do eventually.”

Either way, he says, the industry will get better at producing more oil, more cheaply. “In the fall, everyone believed that once we got below $80 or $70 that all of America’s tight oil would shut down,” he says. “It may shut down a lot of players, but there are tons of players that are very good at what they do and have much lower costs of production.”

WSJ



15 Comments on "What the Future of Oil Drilling Will Look Like"

  1. Nony on Wed, 6th May 2015 7:32 pm 

    Love it.

  2. rockman on Wed, 6th May 2015 7:48 pm 

    A well designed development plan. I’ve seen identical efforts done over the last 40 years and many proved viable.

    BTW all oil fields with significant salt water production utilize disposal wells and always have. The only time when the water is hauled off is when the volume is too small to justify the cost of hauling to a commercial SWD well.

    BTW most fields of significant size pipeline the oil out. It’s trucked out for the same reason water is trucked: too small a volume to justify a pipeline. The term used for the centralized oil storage for more than half a century is a LAC unit…Lease Accounting-Crude unit.

    BTW using NG to generate electricity for drilling ops is good option…seen that done decades ago. Surprised they didn’t toss in the co-generation angle…seen that help reduce costs a tad in one of my fields…about 25 years ago.

    Also the fuel cost savings is fine but typically fuel represent less than 10% of total well costs. But every but helps.

    But it’s a good story and should help move their stock. BTW interesting that a NY based environmental group applauds the plan given that their state still bans frac’ng. I wonder if they would as supportive if the plan was proposed as an angle to lift the frac’ng ban in their backyard.

  3. Nony on Wed, 6th May 2015 8:05 pm 

    They’re Yankees.

  4. apneaman on Wed, 6th May 2015 8:18 pm 

    Oil train derails, catches fire in North Dakota; 5th recent accident for cars being phased out

    http://www.startribune.com/nation/302764581.html

  5. apneaman on Wed, 6th May 2015 8:19 pm 

    Future dustbowl? Fracking ravages Great Plains land and water

    http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_round_up/2852559/future_dustbowl_fracking_ravages_great_plains_land_and_water.html

  6. apneaman on Wed, 6th May 2015 8:21 pm 

    Oil company posts fourth spill in North Dakota

    “BISMARCK, N.D., May 6 (UPI) — For at least the fourth time in less than a year, North Dakota’s government said it was notified by Oasis Petroleum of a spill of oil products near a lake.”

    http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Energy-Resources/2015/05/06/Oil-company-posts-fourth-spill-in-North-Dakota/9801430906959/

  7. coffeeguyzz on Wed, 6th May 2015 8:35 pm 

    Cowboyistan.

  8. shallow sand on Wed, 6th May 2015 11:10 pm 

    $3.7 million dollar SWD well. $16.2 million for lines? Dang.

    I guess maybe not so bad if can handle produced water from 96 producers. Surely will drill at least one more, in the event that SWD well goes down for whatever reason. Wonder what rate and pressure will be on SWD.

    Coffee, you know this stuff, have any thoughts about this operationally? Adds about $200K per well, but I bet they sink some more SWD wells.

  9. shallow sand on Wed, 6th May 2015 11:25 pm 

    Looked at their website, says operating a 9000 acre water flood in Western ND. Are they trying to inject into the producing zone? Will that work in tight reservoirs?

  10. coffeeguyzz on Wed, 6th May 2015 11:42 pm 

    Shallow, Good observations, as always. I don’t know much about the SWD, but I’ll do some checking. Most of the operators are becoming very bullish on the results of slickwater, and using 150,000 bbls and up per frac is becoming routine. Lottsa water handling.
    The guys in the Permian, Marcellus, and,I believe, the EF are re-using a bunch of the produced by treating it and diluting it with fresh water to cut back on volumes and handling.
    The days of using water may be numbered, though. Huge push into non water based frac’ing in labs. Emulsified CO2 seems, in theory, to be optimal, but emulsified nitrogen, field gas, or combinations of these may start to appear down the road. (If you check out Expansion Energy’s site describing this process VRGE or something, fascinating concept). Dresser Rand – now owned by Siemans – actually built a micro, mobile LNG plant based on Expansion Energy’s design.
    Heck, shallow, there even talking about using some Plasma Pulse Technology to ‘shock’ the formation and create fissures.
    Hope things are going well for you, shallow. The $60 WTI has to help.

  11. coffeeguyzz on Wed, 6th May 2015 11:56 pm 

    Shallow, as for the water flood, there’s a bunch of conventional wells over there (Madison or Red River formations? Not the Bakken).
    They may be trying EOR there, mebbe?
    Definitely no water flood in shale.

  12. shallow sand on Thu, 7th May 2015 4:52 am 

    Coffee. $60 is better than $40s for sure.

    If you have time, take a look at Liberty Resource Managements website. They have a link to a story in World Oil magazine about use of jet pumps. Some pretty interesting stuff in that article.

  13. rockman on Thu, 7th May 2015 6:18 am 

    shallow – We’re always going with jet pumps now if the situation is right. So much easier to maintain. You can pump any anti-corrosion chemicals with the working fluid and you don’t have to pull the well to change the pump…just pump it out and pump down a replacement. And you can change the pump rate by just changing the injection pressure. My engineer can do that sitting in the office over his computer. We’ve run them on all my horizontals so when the water cut increases we just crank up the pressure to keep the oil rate constant. But they aren’t cheap so I doubt they’re a good fit for existing strippers.

  14. shortonoil on Thu, 7th May 2015 8:40 am 

    One must wonder how well this will work at $40/barrel oil; because that is were the price is going. The thermodynamics tells us that, and common sense tells us that. No one can afford to cut production, and demand is not going to increase. An economy that can not afford to retire its debt, but must ever depend on the creation of more debt to service existing debt, is not growing. It is shrinking. World debt formation has been at least twice the rate of GDP growth since at least 2008.

    This appears to be another shale fiasco to convince investors to give a company enough money so its CEO can cash his $1 million per year pay check. It is called the 1% welfare system, and has been very popular in recent years! Of course, we wouldn’t want to bring too much common sense into this; it might ruin the ambiance.

    http://www.thehillsgroup.org

  15. Dredd on Thu, 7th May 2015 1:19 pm 

    They new derrick design is you know what shaped.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *