Page added on February 3, 2015
Up to 10 million gallons (38 million liters) of crude oil from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill has settled at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, where it is threatening wildlife and marine ecosystems, according to a new study.
The finding helps solve the mystery of where the “missing” oil from the spill landed. Its location had eluded both the U.S. government and BP cleanup crews after the April 2010 disaster that caused about 200 million gallons (757 million liters) of crude oil to leak into the Gulf.
“This is going to affect the Gulf for years to come,” Jeff Chanton, the study’s lead researcher and a professor of chemical oceanography at Florida State University, said in a statement. “Fish will likely ingest contaminants because worms ingest the sediment, and fish eat the worms. It’s a conduit for contamination into the food web.”
The researchers took 62 sediment cores from an area encompassing 9,266 square miles (24,000 square kilometers) around the site of the Deepwater Horizon spill. Unlike other sediment on the ocean floor, oil does not contain any carbon-14, a radioactive isotope. Therefore, sediment samples without carbon-14 indicate that oil is present, Chanton said.
The scientists avoided areas with natural oil seeps, features in which oil slowly leaks onto the ocean floor through a series of cracks. In these areas, the sediment cores would have a lack of carbon-14 throughout the sample. In areas that don’t normally have oil, “the oil is just in the surficial layer, like in that 0 to 1 centimeter [0 to 0.39 inches] interval,” Chanton told Live Science.
After studying the samples, the researchers made a map of the areas affected by the spill. About 3,243 square miles (8,400 square km) are covered with oil from the Deepwater Horizon spill, they found.
It’s unclear exactly how the oil got there after the spill. One idea is that the oil particles clumped together at the water’s surface, or in plumes from the underwater leak, and became heavy enough to sink to the bottom of the Gulf. Cleanup crews also burned large patches of oil, and the resulting black carbon and ash could have sunk into the water, the researchers said. Or, zooplankton (tiny animals that drift near the water’s surface) may have ingested the oil and discarded it in fecal pellets that sank to the Gulf floor, the researchers added.
For now, the sunken oil may help keep the water above it clear and free of black oil particles, Chanton said, but it’s turning into a long-term problem.
“There’s less oxygen down there, and so that will slow the decomposition rate of the oil,” Chanton said. “It might be there for a long period of time, a little reservoir of contamination.” Moreover, the oil may cause tumors and lesions on underwater animals, research suggests.
The new study supports the findings of another independent study, which found that about 10 percent of the spill’s oil made it to the Gulf floor. Using hopane, a hydrocarbon found in oil, the researchers of that study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in October 2014, analyzed sediment samples to see how much oil had fallen to the bottom of the Gulf.
The new study calculates that 3 to 5 percent of the oil from the spill sank to the ocean floor, but the results of the two studies aren’t that different, Chanton said.
“Our number is a little bit more conservative than theirs,” he said, but “if the two approaches agree within a factor of two, that’s pretty good for estimating all of the oil on the seafloor.”
The findings were published in January in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.
| CBS News |
4 Comments on "“Missing oil” from 2010 BP spill found on gulf seafloor"
dissident on Tue, 3rd Feb 2015 10:21 pm
Well, at least the sediment heterotrophic bacteria are happy.
OFT on Wed, 4th Feb 2015 6:17 am
It is interesting that the numbers are reported in gallons and even liters, in this article from CBS, whose target audience may be more familiar with units such as ‘barrels of oil’ – perhaps 238 thousand barrels (or even 0.238 Mbbl) does not sound as significant?
” … according to the CIA Factbook, [this] makes the US one of only three countries (alongside Burma and Liberia) that have not adopted the metric system as their official system of weights and measures.[1]
However, recent evidence from visitors and trading partners indicates that there is widespread use of the metric system in both Liberia and Myanmar,[2] and in October 2013, a Myanmar government minister announced that his country was preparing to formally adopt the metric system.[3] This leaves the USA as the only country in the world that has not adopted the system.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metrication_in_the_United_States
Longtimber on Wed, 4th Feb 2015 1:36 pm
How about .76 Billion Liters.
PrestonSturges on Wed, 4th Feb 2015 2:23 pm
On a smaller scale, there are lots of natural outcropping of asphalt and oil on the sea floor. Off California, there are small sea mounts of asphalt. They are not dead zones by any means, the oil is covered in thick layers of marine life. It’s not the best outcome, but it’s also not going to be a permanent dead zone or death trap